Note about the old name #996
Replies: 3 comments 2 replies
-
I agree. A few months ago I thought about that but I forgot to do it. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Also, I guess, we can drop |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I have an alternative and less confusing proposition. @wwmm , please bring back the pulseeffects repo at the last non-pipewire version and make it read-only so those of us who don't use pipewire at all can find it easier and fork it if needed. Right now, googling pulseeffects shows this repo under the old name and the rename was only visible here on github, and I had to dig for a while to see it was renamed entirely and not hacked or something. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Hi.
It's OK to change the name (yeah, we have no deal with PulseAudio now I guess), but I suggest to add a note somewhere (repo description or README) about former PulseEffects name. It can be helpful for correct search results, old users and new users from out-of-dated external links.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions