OpenClaw-bot-review/rd-council-items.json at main · xmanrui/OpenClaw-bot-review · GitHub

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
[
  {
    "id": "ingestion-openclaw-model-routing-optimization",
    "title": "OpenClaw Model Routing Optimization",
    "summary": "Frequent model/routing discussion suggests smarter model selection based on task complexity, latency, and cost.",
    "created_at": "2026-04-30T21:18:35.794Z",
    "stage": "opportunity",
    "council_session_id": "auto-ingestion",
    "promotion_reason": "Detected from usage pattern analysis (1 signal)",
    "proposing_model": "ollama-cloud/qwen3.5:397b-cloud",
    "origin_type": "proactive",
    "origin_tags": [
      "⚙️ Efficiency Gap",
      "📊 Early Signal"
    ],
    "proactive_lens": "efficiency",
    "idea_ledger_id": "ledger-openclaw-model-routing-optimization",
    "council_confidence": "high",
    "debate_summary": [
      "Evidence: 1 matching usage signal found in available session/log text",
      "Impact: Frequent model/routing discussion suggests smarter model selection based on task complexity, latency, and cost.",
      "Resource check: start with a narrow, reversible implementation before broader automation"
    ],
    "key_disagreements": [
      {
        "model": "devil-advocate",
        "concern": "Signal could be inflated by repeated discussion rather than repeated operational pain",
        "resolution": "Require dedupe and keep items in trending/opportunity until supported by concrete task telemetry"
      }
    ],
    "council_recommendation": "Add read-only model routing telemetry first, then A/B test routing rules by task class and cost/latency outcome.",
    "passing_reasoning": "high confidence based on 1 observed signal and low-risk staged rollout path",
    "escalation_type": "auto",
    "session_type": "scheduled",
    "scheduled_for": "2026-04-30T21:19:24.061Z",
    "session_time_of_day": "evening",
    "decision": null,
    "is_hidden": false
  },
  {
    "id": "ingestion-telegram-webhook-integration",
    "title": "Telegram Webhook Integration",
    "summary": "Telegram-heavy operations would benefit from async processing, idempotency, and status feedback.",
    "created_at": "2026-04-30T21:18:35.794Z",
    "stage": "trending",
    "council_session_id": "auto-ingestion",
    "promotion_reason": "Detected from usage pattern analysis (1 signal)",
    "proposing_model": "ollama-cloud/qwen3.5:397b-cloud",
    "origin_type": "proactive",
    "origin_tags": [
      "🏗️ Infrastructure Idea",
      "📊 Early Signal"
    ],
    "proactive_lens": "infrastructure",
    "idea_ledger_id": "ledger-telegram-webhook-integration",
    "council_confidence": "medium",
    "debate_summary": [
      "Evidence: 1 matching usage signal found in available session/log text",
      "Impact: Telegram-heavy operations would benefit from async processing, idempotency, and status feedback.",
      "Resource check: start with a narrow, reversible implementation before broader automation"
    ],
    "key_disagreements": [
      {
        "model": "devil-advocate",
        "concern": "Signal could be inflated by repeated discussion rather than repeated operational pain",
        "resolution": "Require dedupe and keep items in trending/opportunity until supported by concrete task telemetry"
      }
    ],
    "council_recommendation": "Back Telegram-triggered long jobs with the detached runner/outbox pattern, idempotency keys, and confirmation gates for side effects.",
    "passing_reasoning": "medium confidence based on 1 observed signal and low-risk staged rollout path",
    "escalation_type": "auto",
    "session_type": "scheduled",
    "scheduled_for": "2026-04-30T21:19:24.061Z",
    "session_time_of_day": "evening",
    "decision": null,
    "is_hidden": false
  },
  {
    "id": "ingestion-docker-deployment-pipeline",
    "title": "Docker Deployment Pipeline",
    "summary": "Repeated build/deploy signals suggest a repo-specific CI/CD pipeline with caching and approval gates.",
    "created_at": "2026-04-30T21:18:35.794Z",
    "stage": "opportunity",
    "council_session_id": "auto-ingestion",
    "promotion_reason": "Detected from usage pattern analysis (1 signal)",
    "proposing_model": "ollama-cloud/qwen3.5:397b-cloud",
    "origin_type": "proactive",
    "origin_tags": [
      "⚙️ Efficiency Gap",
      "📊 Early Signal"
    ],
    "proactive_lens": "efficiency",
    "idea_ledger_id": "ledger-docker-deployment-pipeline",
    "council_confidence": "high",
    "debate_summary": [
      "Evidence: 1 matching usage signal found in available session/log text",
      "Impact: Repeated build/deploy signals suggest a repo-specific CI/CD pipeline with caching and approval gates.",
      "Resource check: start with a narrow, reversible implementation before broader automation"
    ],
    "key_disagreements": [
      {
        "model": "devil-advocate",
        "concern": "Signal could be inflated by repeated discussion rather than repeated operational pain",
        "resolution": "Require dedupe and keep items in trending/opportunity until supported by concrete task telemetry"
      }
    ],
    "council_recommendation": "Start with one dashboard repository workflow: build, cache dependencies, run tests, and require approval for production pushes.",
    "passing_reasoning": "high confidence based on 1 observed signal and low-risk staged rollout path",
    "escalation_type": "auto",
    "session_type": "scheduled",
    "scheduled_for": "2026-04-30T21:19:24.061Z",
    "session_time_of_day": "evening",
    "decision": null,
    "is_hidden": false
  },
  {
    "id": "ingestion-self-improvement-automation",
    "title": "Self-Improvement Automation",
    "summary": "Self-improvement dashboard changes should flow from real usage evidence into reviewable improvement items.",
    "created_at": "2026-04-30T21:18:35.794Z",
    "stage": "trending",
    "council_session_id": "auto-ingestion",
    "promotion_reason": "Detected from usage pattern analysis (1 signal)",
    "proposing_model": "ollama-cloud/qwen3.5:397b-cloud",
    "origin_type": "proactive",
    "origin_tags": [
      "🔍 Pattern Detected",
      "📊 Early Signal"
    ],
    "proactive_lens": "pattern",
    "idea_ledger_id": "ledger-self-improvement-automation",
    "council_confidence": "medium",
    "debate_summary": [
      "Evidence: 1 matching usage signal found in available session/log text",
      "Impact: Self-improvement dashboard changes should flow from real usage evidence into reviewable improvement items.",
      "Resource check: start with a narrow, reversible implementation before broader automation"
    ],
    "key_disagreements": [
      {
        "model": "devil-advocate",
        "concern": "Signal could be inflated by repeated discussion rather than repeated operational pain",
        "resolution": "Require dedupe and keep items in trending/opportunity until supported by concrete task telemetry"
      }
    ],
    "council_recommendation": "Use this canonical ingestion API as the single source of truth, with dedupe, complete schema, and evidence snippets.",
    "passing_reasoning": "medium confidence based on 1 observed signal and low-risk staged rollout path",
    "escalation_type": "auto",
    "session_type": "scheduled",
    "scheduled_for": "2026-04-30T21:19:24.061Z",
    "session_time_of_day": "evening",
    "decision": null,
    "is_hidden": false
  }
]