Maybe I've missed seomthing but isn't
-(int16_t)(ref_clk_expected_pt - ref_clk_pt)
the same as
(int16_t)(ref_clk_pt - ref_clk_expected_pt)
Given that the terms are unit16_t
If so, the result is always (int16_t)(ref_clk_pt - ref_clk_expected_pt)
Originally posted by @humphrey-xmos in #93 (comment)
Maybe I've missed seomthing but isn't
-(int16_t)(ref_clk_expected_pt - ref_clk_pt)the same as
(int16_t)(ref_clk_pt - ref_clk_expected_pt)Given that the terms are
unit16_tIf so, the result is always
(int16_t)(ref_clk_pt - ref_clk_expected_pt)Originally posted by @humphrey-xmos in #93 (comment)