Skip to content

Request to support running with just CAP_BPF instead of CAP_SYS_ADMIN #48

@chrisirhc

Description

@chrisirhc

Article reference: https://mdaverde.com/posts/cap-bpf/

CAP_SYS_ADMIN is highly permissive. There's a newer CAP_BPF capability on newer kernels.
I'm opening this issue to see if there's interest in supporting usage via CAP_BPF.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions