Sharing iP code quality feedback [for @zm-l] #1
Description
@zm-l We did an automated analysis of your code to detect potential areas to improve the code quality. We are sharing the results below, to help you improve the iP code further.
IMPORTANT: Note that the script looked for just a few easy-to-detect problems only, and at-most three example are given i.e., there can be other areas/places to improve.
Aspect: Tab Usage
No easy-to-detect issues 👍
Aspect: Naming boolean variables/methods
No easy-to-detect issues 👍
Aspect: Brace Style
No easy-to-detect issues 👍
Aspect: Package Name Style
No easy-to-detect issues 👍
Aspect: Class Name Style
No easy-to-detect issues 👍
Aspect: Dead Code
Example from src/main/java/duke/storage/Storage.java lines 61-61:
// File directory = new File("./data");Example from src/main/java/duke/storage/Storage.java lines 62-62:
// if (! directory.exists()){Example from src/main/java/duke/storage/Storage.java lines 63-63:
// directory.mkdir();Suggestion: Remove dead code from the codebase.
Aspect: Method Length
No easy-to-detect issues 👍
Aspect: Class size
No easy-to-detect issues 👍
Aspect: Header Comments
No easy-to-detect issues 👍
Aspect: Recent Git Commit Message (Subject Only)
No easy-to-detect issues 👍
Aspect: Binary files in repo
No easy-to-detect issues 👍
ℹ️ The bot account used to post this issue is un-manned. Do not reply to this post (as those replies will not be read). Instead, contact [email protected] if you want to follow up on this post.