docs: add skill-guided ERC-8004 partner flow - #104
Draft
jonathanprozzi wants to merge 1 commit into
Draft
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changed
Why
The partner guide and released
erc8004-agent-layerskill previously exposed the same integration through separate surfaces without clearly explaining how they fit together. The page now presents one canonical semantic model with two entry paths: skill-guided planning for agents and manual SDK implementation for engineers.This also incorporates the battle-test findings around deterministic IDs, label ambiguity, missing shared vocabulary, pinning credentials, cost calculations, and approval escalation.
Partner impact
Partners can begin with a deterministic no-write semantic plan, review exact registry IDs and proposed graph structure, and only then move into separately approved protocol phases. Teams that prefer direct SDK implementation retain the full manual flow and use the same registry and safety rules.
Validation
npm run validate-linksnpm run validate-queriesnpm run validate-sdk-examplesnpm run validate-llms-coveragenpm run buildsemantic_plan_readyfor ERC-8004 agent8453:1380No pinning or chain writes were performed during validation.