-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 344
fix: add boundary checks for u64 shift/rotate operations #3368
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
Sertug17
wants to merge
4
commits into
0xMiden:next
Choose a base branch
from
Sertug17:fix/u64-boundary-checks
base: next
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+139
−9
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
d822369
fix: add boundary checks for u64 shift/rotate operations
Sertug17 a93f5df
Add clk-based cycle count regression tests for u64 shift/rotate ops
Sertug17 843cb5c
fix: move #3368 CHANGELOG entry to v0.30.0 and remove duplicate #3371
Sertug17 737a8d7
Merge branch 'next' into fix/u64-boundary-checks
Sertug17 File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This adds work before the old body, so the cycle-count docs above this and the other three changed procs now look stale. Could you recompute and update the
This takes ... cyclescomments forshl,shr,rotl, androtr?One way to check them is to add a temporary core-lib test that wraps each
exec.u64::*call withclkbefore and after the call, then computes the delta. Sinceclkitself costs one cycle, subtract the firstclkinstruction from the measured difference.