-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 276
Implement option_simple_close
#2967
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
option_simple_close (simpler variant)option_simple_close
67aa29f to
420298c
Compare
420298c to
d57c3a7
Compare
d57c3a7 to
d5c6021
Compare
d5c6021 to
f738b99
Compare
sstone
reviewed
Feb 10, 2025
eclair-core/src/main/scala/fr/acinq/eclair/channel/Helpers.scala
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
eclair-core/src/main/scala/fr/acinq/eclair/channel/fsm/CommonHandlers.scala
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
sstone
reviewed
Feb 11, 2025
Member
sstone
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM! just a few nits
eclair-core/src/main/scala/fr/acinq/eclair/channel/Helpers.scala
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
eclair-core/src/test/scala/fr/acinq/eclair/payment/relay/AsyncPaymentTriggererSpec.scala
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
eclair-core/src/main/scala/fr/acinq/eclair/transactions/Transactions.scala
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
bade5a6 to
73bff0e
Compare
Member
Author
|
Rebased to fix the trivial conflict in |
sstone
previously approved these changes
Feb 11, 2025
This feature adds two new messages: - `closing_complete` sent after exchanging `shutdown` - `closing_sig` sent in response to `closing_complete`
The spec allows the closer to use an OP_RETURN output if their amount is too low when using `option_simple_close`.
73bff0e to
a01cde4
Compare
Member
Author
|
Rebased to fix trivial conflict in |
sstone
previously approved these changes
Feb 13, 2025
pm47
previously approved these changes
Feb 13, 2025
We introduce a new `NEGOTIATING_SIMPLE` state where we exchange the `closing_complete` and `closing_sig` messages, and allow RBF-ing previous transactions and updating our closing script. We stay in that state until one of the transactions confirms, or a force close is detected. This is important to ensure we're able to correctly reconnect and negotiate RBF candidates. We keep this separate from the previous `NEGOTIATING` state to make it easier to remove support for the older mutual close protocols once we're confident the network has been upgraded.
a01cde4 to
f7b4212
Compare
Member
Author
|
Rebased to squash fixup commits. |
pm47
approved these changes
Feb 13, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Implement
option_simple_closeas defined in the official spec feature in lightning/bolts#1205Hopefully this is the last time we change the mutual close protocol! And at some point that will let us entirely remove all the code supporting the two previous mutual close protocols (this is why I kept the code as separate as possible instead of trying to fit into the existing
NEGOTIATINGstate).Note that this is a prerequisite for taproot channels: this protocol allows nodes to safely exchange nonces in
shutdown,closing_completeandclosing_sigto spend a musig2 channel output.I have verified that we have cross-compat with
lndso this is ready to integrate!