Tidy/unused includes #2249
Draft
Tidy/unused includes #2249
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wheatley <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wheatley <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wheatley <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wheatley <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wheatley <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wheatley <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wheatley <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wheatley <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wheatley <[email protected]>
KevinJW
added
the
Needs Discussion
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wheatley <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wheatley <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
As part of trying to see if I could improve the incremental build times I started to work through what includes we use and where.
This is not complete by any stretch, I've mostly looked at an inclusion dependency graph for anything that didn't feel right, removing unneeded inclusions and adding inclusions where they are directly used by the files. I'll try get some numbers together for the next TSC.
I'll possibly also have a go at running IWYU on the repo if I have the spare time.