Skip to content

Conversation

@portsmouth
Copy link
Contributor

Then GitHub pages needs to be pointed to the new /docs folder.

jstone-lucasfilm and others added 2 commits June 28, 2024 14:05
This changelist merges v1.1 development from dev_1.1 to main, in preparation for marking the release of OpenPBR v1.1.
- GitHub pages needs to be pointed to docs folder
Copy link
Contributor

@virtualzavie virtualzavie left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@portsmouth
Copy link
Contributor Author

portsmouth commented Aug 25, 2024

(Note, on merging this, the admin needs to change the GitHub pages settings to point to the /docs folder).

Adding here the finalized logo. This is almost identical to the one posted on Slack, except:

  - extremely small adjustment to the arrow head, to make it perfectly centered on and orthogonal to the stroke

  - SVG was optimized to remove redundant elements (e.g. gradients). Main logo is now only 10Kb. PNGs exported at 800dpi.
@portsmouth portsmouth changed the base branch from main to dev_1.2 October 1, 2024 19:32
@portsmouth
Copy link
Contributor Author

portsmouth commented Oct 15, 2024

@jstone-lucasfilm can be merged? (Note that GitHub pages needs to be pointed to the new /docs folder, just after merge. Also would be good to check it didn't break any links).

…oftwareFoundation#238)

Rather than eliminating the `specular_weight` > 1 case (as proposed in AcademySoftwareFoundation#228), we discussed keeping this but fixing up the metal logic to ensure the Fresnel remains bounded. This makes the corresponding change needed in the spec. (Note that now the `specular_weight` parameter consistently, for both metal and dielectric, has soft-range $[0,1]$ and full range $[0, \infty]$).

It would be good to double check that the behaviour of the metal looks reasonable for high `specular_weight` values (presumably, similar to the dielectric where the Fresnel saturates).
@AdrienHerubel AdrienHerubel changed the base branch from dev_1.2 to dev_1.1.1 June 10, 2025 15:19
@AdrienHerubel AdrienHerubel self-requested a review June 10, 2025 15:19
Copy link
Contributor

@AdrienHerubel AdrienHerubel left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Need to fix conflicts.

@portsmouth portsmouth changed the base branch from dev_1.1.1 to main June 10, 2025 15:55
@portsmouth portsmouth changed the base branch from main to dev_1.1.1 June 23, 2025 19:04
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants