Remove AutoFixture.Xunit2 dependency from CustomizeAttributeComparer

[piotrzajac]

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Refactor

  • Improved comparison logic for parameter customization attributes by introducing a more flexible, generic comparer.
  • Updated internal attribute ordering to use a type-specific comparer, potentially affecting the prioritization of certain customizations.

• Tests

  • Adjusted tests to align with the new generic comparer implementation.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The changes refactor the CustomizeAttributeComparer class from a non-generic to a generic type, parameterized by a type T constrained to IParameterCustomizationSource. This update modifies the comparison logic to operate on the specified type T instead of being hardcoded for FrozenAttribute. Corresponding updates are made in both the test class and the usage within AutoDataAdapterAttribute, ensuring that the comparer is now explicitly typed for FrozenAttribute in relevant contexts. No changes were made to public APIs or method signatures outside of internal logic and type declarations.

Changes

File(s)	Change Summary
src/Objectivity.AutoFixture.XUnit2.Core/Comparers/CustomizeAttributeComparer.cs	Refactored CustomizeAttributeComparer to a generic class CustomizeAttributeComparer<T>, updating comparison logic to use type T instead of hardcoded FrozenAttribute. Removed unused import.
src/Objectivity.AutoFixture.XUnit2.Core/Attributes/AutoDataAdapterAttribute.cs	Updated usage of comparer in CustomizeFixture method to use CustomizeAttributeComparer<FrozenAttribute>.
src/Objectivity.AutoFixture.XUnit2.Core.Tests/Comparers/CustomizeAttributeComparerTests.cs	Changed test field to use CustomizeAttributeComparer<FrozenAttribute> instead of non-generic version.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant Test as CustomizeAttributeComparerTests
    participant Comparer as CustomizeAttributeComparer<FrozenAttribute>
    participant Attribute as IParameterCustomizationSource

    Test->>Comparer: Compare(x: Attribute, y: Attribute)
    alt x is FrozenAttribute and y is not
        Comparer-->>Test: return 1
    else y is FrozenAttribute and x is not
        Comparer-->>Test: return -1
    else
        Comparer-->>Test: return 0
    end

Loading

Poem

In the garden of code, a comparer grew,
Now generic and fresh, with a type shining through.
No longer hardwired, it flexes with glee,
Sorting attributes smartly, as neat as can be.
With tests in the meadow and logic anew,
This rabbit hops forward, refactoring true! 🐇✨

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between bf51a7e and 42019a1.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)

• src/Objectivity.AutoFixture.XUnit2.Core.Tests/Comparers/CustomizeAttributeComparerTests.cs (1 hunks)
• src/Objectivity.AutoFixture.XUnit2.Core/Attributes/AutoDataAdapterAttribute.cs (1 hunks)
• src/Objectivity.AutoFixture.XUnit2.Core/Comparers/CustomizeAttributeComparer.cs (1 hunks)

🧰 Additional context used

🧬 Code Graph Analysis (2)

src/Objectivity.AutoFixture.XUnit2.Core/Attributes/AutoDataAdapterAttribute.cs (1)

src/Objectivity.AutoFixture.XUnit2.Core/Comparers/CustomizeAttributeComparer.cs (1)

• CustomizeAttributeComparer (7-27)

src/Objectivity.AutoFixture.XUnit2.Core.Tests/Comparers/CustomizeAttributeComparerTests.cs (1)

src/Objectivity.AutoFixture.XUnit2.Core/Comparers/CustomizeAttributeComparer.cs (1)

• CustomizeAttributeComparer (7-27)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (8)

• GitHub Check: build-test-pack (AutoFakeItEasy) / run
• GitHub Check: build-test-pack (Core) / run
• GitHub Check: build-test-pack (AutoMoq) / run
• GitHub Check: build-test-pack (AutoNSubstitute) / run
• GitHub Check: scan
• GitHub Check: scan (csharp)
• GitHub Check: test
• GitHub Check: scan

🔇 Additional comments (4)

src/Objectivity.AutoFixture.XUnit2.Core/Comparers/CustomizeAttributeComparer.cs (2)

7-8: Well-designed generic implementation!

Converting the CustomizeAttributeComparer to a generic class with proper type constraints effectively removes the dependency on AutoFixture.Xunit2, aligning with the PR objective. This change enhances flexibility while maintaining the same sorting behavior.

---

12-14: Good adaptation of comparison logic

The comparison logic has been properly generalized to work with the type parameter T instead of the hardcoded FrozenAttribute. This maintains the same functionality while being more flexible for future uses.

src/Objectivity.AutoFixture.XUnit2.Core/Attributes/AutoDataAdapterAttribute.cs (1)

49-49: Correctly updated to use generic comparer

The usage of CustomizeAttributeComparer has been properly updated to the new generic version with FrozenAttribute, maintaining the same behavior while using the improved implementation.

src/Objectivity.AutoFixture.XUnit2.Core.Tests/Comparers/CustomizeAttributeComparerTests.cs (1)

15-15: Test correctly updated to use generic comparer

The test class has been properly updated to use the new generic CustomizeAttributeComparer<FrozenAttribute>, ensuring consistency with the implementation changes.

✨ Finishing Touches

• 📝 Generate Docstrings

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
• @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[github-actions]

Qodana Community for .NET

Analyzed project: src/

It seems all right 👌

No new problems were found according to the checks applied

View the detailed Qodana report

To be able to view the detailed Qodana report, you can either:

• Register at Qodana Cloud and configure the action
• Use GitHub Code Scanning with Qodana
• Host Qodana report at GitHub Pages
• Inspect and use qodana.sarif.json (see the Qodana SARIF format for details)

To get *.log files or any other Qodana artifacts, run the action with upload-result option set to true,
so that the action will upload the files as the job artifacts:

      - name: 'Qodana Scan'
        uses: JetBrains/[email protected]
        with:
          upload-result: true

Contact Qodana team

Contact us at [email protected]

• Or via our issue tracker: https://jb.gg/qodana-issue
• Or share your feedback: https://jb.gg/qodana-discussions

[codecov-commenter]

⚠️ Please install the to ensure uploads and comments are reliably processed by Codecov.

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (bf51a7e) to head (42019a1).

❗ Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##            master      #257   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files           39        39           
  Lines          424       424           
  Branches        55        55           
=========================================
  Hits           424       424           

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	99.76% <100.00%> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.