Skip to content

Fix Singapore HDB Resale Analysis to match Condo Analysis structure#8

Draft
Copilot wants to merge 3 commits intomainfrom
copilot/sin-260-fix-hdb-resale-analysis
Draft

Fix Singapore HDB Resale Analysis to match Condo Analysis structure#8
Copilot wants to merge 3 commits intomainfrom
copilot/sin-260-fix-hdb-resale-analysis

Conversation

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Copilot AI commented Mar 28, 2026

HDB Resale Analysis workflow was missing structural phases present in the Condo Analysis workflow and had inconsistent conventions in prerequisites and variable sections.

Changes to workflows/singapore-hdb-resale-analysis/SKILL.md

Prerequisites / conventions alignment

  • always report how much was spentand always report how much was spent
  • Variables heading example changed from ${TARGET_AREA_OR_BLOCK} to generic ${NAME_OF_VARIABLE}; removed parenthetical exclusion caveat to match condo phrasing

Phase 3 (Build comps) — Perplexity method-support note

  • Added Perplexity Search for methodology validation only, with explicit "do not override source data" guard and forward reference to Phase 5

New Phase 4 — Location convenience and quality signals

  • Equivalent of condo Phase 2; uses Brave Search + Tavily Search
  • 1–5 scoring across MRT/LRT, schools, amenities, area quality; weighted convenience score (30/25/25/20)
  • HDB-specific area quality signal: SERS/VERS potential and estate rejuvenation plans

New Phase 5 — 5-year scenario modeling

  • HDB equivalent of condo's post-SSD Phase 3; bear/base/bull cases
  • HDB-specific assumption dimensions: BTO supply levels, resale levy changes, lease decay exposure, CPF usage restrictions near 60-year threshold

Phase renumbering and report sections

  • Old Phase 4 (Heuristics) → Phase 6; old Phase 5 (Assemble report) → Phase 7
  • Report sections 7–8 added: Location convenience score and Scenario outlook; Caveats/Next steps renumbered to 9–10
  • Final render instruction simplified to match condo format: Whenever you plan to produce a Markdown report, render it using [Markdown by Agently](...) via use-agently.com.
Original prompt

Issue Title: Fix "Singapore HDB Resale Analysis" to follow "Singapore Condo Analysis"
Issue Description: For https://github.com/AgentlyHQ/workflows/blob/main/workflows/singapore-hdb-resale-analysis/SKILL.md

Please make a PR to match https://github.com/AgentlyHQ/workflows/blob/main/workflows/singapore-condo-analysis/SKILL.md

Make changes to the HDB analysis workflow only. Do not make a new workflow.
Fixes https://linear.app/aixyz/issue/SIN-260/fix-singapore-hdb-resale-analysis-to-follow-singapore-condo-analysis
Branch Name should include the identifier "SIN-260"
Agent Guidance:

  • When you want to create an Agent -> GitHub Project: AgentlyHQ/singularity

Especially if you're tasked with Agent creation or it looks like Agent Creation task: it's the repo singularity — DO NOT USE ANY OTHER REPOS — AGENT ARE CODE

When you want to create Workflow (those with workflow labels) -> GitHub Project: AgentlHQ/workflows — Workflows are Markdown FILES!!

Issue Comments:
Comment by User (2026-03-28T10:09:31.702Z):
This thread is for an agent session with githubcopilot.


💡 You can make Copilot smarter by setting up custom instructions, customizing its development environment and configuring Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers. Learn more Copilot coding agent tips in the docs.

Copilot AI assigned Copilot and gjj Mar 28, 2026
@linear
Copy link
Copy Markdown

linear bot commented Mar 28, 2026

@vercel
Copy link
Copy Markdown

vercel bot commented Mar 28, 2026

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Actions Updated (UTC)
workflows.use-agently.com Ready Ready Preview, Comment Mar 28, 2026 10:15am

Request Review

Copilot AI changed the title [WIP] Fix Singapore HDB resale analysis to match Singapore Condo analysis Fix Singapore HDB Resale Analysis to match Condo Analysis structure Mar 28, 2026
Copilot finished work on behalf of gjj March 28, 2026 10:16
Copilot AI requested a review from gjj March 28, 2026 10:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants