Skip to content

[PWGDQ] Save the information of ambiguous pairs #10733

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 6 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

yuanz-USTC
Copy link
Contributor

Define histograms to save the information of mix event ambiguous pairs and also ambiguous pairs which are double counted for both same event and mix event.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the pwgdq label Apr 2, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot changed the title Save the information of ambiguous pairs [PWGDQ] Save the information of ambiguous pairs Apr 2, 2025
Please consider the following formatting changes to AliceO2Group#10733
@alibuild
Copy link
Collaborator

alibuild commented Apr 2, 2025

Error while checking build/O2Physics/o2 for 8d48489 at 2025-04-02 16:24:

## sw/BUILD/O2Physics-latest/log
/sw/SOURCES/O2Physics/10733-slc9_x86-64/0/PWGDQ/Tasks/tableReader_withAssoc.cxx:1762:37: error: 'iPairs' was not declared in this scope; did you mean 'iPair'?
/sw/SOURCES/O2Physics/10733-slc9_x86-64/0/PWGDQ/Tasks/tableReader_withAssoc.cxx:1765:35: error: 'iPairs' was not declared in this scope; did you mean 'iPair'?
/sw/SOURCES/O2Physics/10733-slc9_x86-64/0/PWGDQ/Tasks/tableReader_withAssoc.cxx:1957:35: error: 'iPairs' was not declared in this scope; did you mean 'iPair'?
/sw/SOURCES/O2Physics/10733-slc9_x86-64/0/PWGDQ/Tasks/tableReader_withAssoc.cxx:1960:33: error: 'iPairs' was not declared in this scope; did you mean 'iPair'?
ninja: build stopped: subcommand failed.

Full log here.

@alibuild
Copy link
Collaborator

Error while checking build/O2Physics/o2 for bd3a358 at 2025-04-28 15:09:

No log files found

Full log here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants