Skip to content

[PWGHF] store PID info in 3-prong candidate table and propagate it to analyses. #10984

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Draft
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Draft

[PWGHF] store PID info in 3-prong candidate table and propagate it to analyses. #10984

wants to merge 3 commits into from
+266 −219

Conversation

mfaggin
Copy link
Collaborator

@mfaggin mfaggin commented Apr 25, 2025

No description provided.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the pwghf PWG-HF label Apr 25, 2025
@github-actions GitHub Actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Apr 25, 2025 •
edited
Loading

O2 linter results: ❌ 6 errors, ⚠️ 0 warnings, 🔕 4 disabled

@github-actions github-actions bot changed the title [PWGHF]: store PID info in 3-prong candidate table and propagate it to analyses. [PWGHF] store PID info in 3-prong candidate table and propagate it to analyses. Apr 25, 2025
@alibuild alibuild mentioned this pull request Apr 25, 2025
Open
Mattia Faggin added 3 commits April 25, 2025 14:55
Fill single-track PID tables in cand. creator 3 prong.
a75f9bb
Propagate changes to code related to Lc analyses.
64c6b95 
Modifications done on core code
 - PWGHF/Core/HfMlResponseLcToPKPi.h
 - PWGHF/DataModel/CandidateReconstructionTables.h
 - PWGHF/TableProducer/candidateSelectorLc.cxx

Analysis tasks + following code where modifications are needed:
 - [ MODIFIED ] PWGHF/TableProducer/treeCreatorLcToPKPi.cxx
 - [ MODIFIED ] PWGHF/TableProducer/candidateSelectorLcPidMl.cxx
 - [ MODIFIED ] PWGHF/TableProducer/treeCreatorLbToLcPi.cxx
 - [ MODIFIED ] PWGHF/TableProducer/derivedDataCreatorLcToPKPi.cxx

Analysis tasks + following code where modifications are not needed (no explicit call of Lc-daughter PID):
 - [not modified] PWGHF/TableProducer/candidateSelectorLbToLcPi.cxx (*)
 - [not modified] PWGHF/D2H/Tasks/taskLb.cxx (*)
 - [not modified] PWGHF/TableProducer/candidateCreatorSigmac0plusplus.cxx (*)
 - [not modified] PWGHF/D2H/Tasks/taskSigmac.cxx (*)
 - [not modified] PWGHF/D2H/Tasks/taskLc.cxx
 - [not modified] PWGHF/D2H/Tasks/taskCharmPolarisation.cxx
 - [not modified] PWGHF/HFC/TableProducer/correlatorLcHadrons.cxx (*)
 - [not modified] PWGHF/HFC/Tasks/taskCorrelationLcHadrons.cxx (*)
 - [not modified] PWGHF/HFC/TableProducer/femtoDreamProducer.cxx (*)
 - [not modified] PWGHF/HFC/Tasks/taskFlow.cxx
 - [not modified] PWGHF/TableProducer/candidateCreatorMcGen.cxx
 - [not modified] PWGHF/TableProducer/candidateCreatorLb.cxx

 (*) any PID post-calibration for the additional/associated track needs to be added, if PID info for such track is used

To be modified when also D+ and Ds are treated:
 - [not modified] PWGHF/D2H/Tasks/taskFlowCharmHadrons.cxx

Ignored:
 - [not modified] PWGHF/Tasks/taskLcCentrality.cxx
 - [not modified] PWGHF/Tasks/taskSelOptimisation.cxx
 - [not modified] PWGHF/Tasks/taskMcEfficiency.cxx
 - [not modified] PWGHF/Tasks/taskMcValidation.cxx
Fix Clang format.
5a5fa5e
@mfaggin
Copy link
Collaborator Author

mfaggin commented Apr 25, 2025

@fgrosa I should have addressed everything for Lc. Other 3 prongs have to be adapted.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@alibuild alibuild Awaiting requested review from alibuild alibuild will be requested when the pull request is marked ready for review alibuild is a code owner

@vkucera vkucera Awaiting requested review from vkucera vkucera will be requested when the pull request is marked ready for review vkucera is a code owner

@fcolamar fcolamar Awaiting requested review from fcolamar fcolamar will be requested when the pull request is marked ready for review fcolamar is a code owner

@fgrosa fgrosa Awaiting requested review from fgrosa fgrosa will be requested when the pull request is marked ready for review fgrosa is a code owner

@fcatalan92 fcatalan92 Awaiting requested review from fcatalan92 fcatalan92 will be requested when the pull request is marked ready for review fcatalan92 is a code owner

@mmazzilli mmazzilli Awaiting requested review from mmazzilli mmazzilli will be requested when the pull request is marked ready for review mmazzilli is a code owner

@deepathoms deepathoms Awaiting requested review from deepathoms deepathoms will be requested when the pull request is marked ready for review deepathoms is a code owner

@NicoleBastid NicoleBastid Awaiting requested review from NicoleBastid NicoleBastid will be requested when the pull request is marked ready for review NicoleBastid is a code owner

@hahassan7 hahassan7 Awaiting requested review from hahassan7 hahassan7 will be requested when the pull request is marked ready for review hahassan7 is a code owner

@jpxrk jpxrk Awaiting requested review from jpxrk jpxrk will be requested when the pull request is marked ready for review jpxrk is a code owner

@apalasciano apalasciano Awaiting requested review from apalasciano apalasciano will be requested when the pull request is marked ready for review apalasciano is a code owner

@zhangbiao-phy zhangbiao-phy Awaiting requested review from zhangbiao-phy zhangbiao-phy will be requested when the pull request is marked ready for review zhangbiao-phy is a code owner

At least 1 approving review is required to merge this pull request.

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
datamodel pwghf PWG-HF
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
1 participant
@mfaggin