-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 43
refactor(ama-mfe-ng-utils): simplify resize directive #3051
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
maxokorokov
wants to merge
1
commit into
AmadeusITGroup:main
Choose a base branch
from
maxokorokov:resize-refactor
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+28
−124
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If I understand well, with this change we will then limit the application to a single scalable iframe per app without strange behavior.
Not sure we want to bring this limitation at this stage to simplify the code.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hey, yes, of course one day we might need a mechanism to support multiple apps visible at the same time (ex. resize and subroute navigation). It's just today's consumer/producer model doesn't support this, because they're not configurable and register via DI.
I'd say passing and
appId
as a part of a data model every time is not the best way to do it ;) ex. if we have other app-specific messages?We need something like, even though it is not probably the best way to do it:
I'd also argue that it is not up to
ResizeDirectve
to configure the consumer, but to one who knows theappId
(iframe level?). I can go further and argue thatResizeDirective
shouldn't even exist just to do[style.height]
binding, but it should be done by the iframe wrapper (but I won't ;).I can add configuration in a separate PR, or later if necessary, I just don't think resize directive should even know about
appId
.WDYT?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Here, I made a picture ;)
Basically the same way as switching by message
type
at the consumer manager level, we should also allow consumer instances to filter who the message isfrom
Maybe just adding
from
to the BasicConsumer would do the job:or at the lower level (
.start()
or.configure()
):