| Version | Supported |
|---|---|
| 0.2.x | ✅ |
| 0.1.x | ❌ |
Email: [email protected]
DO NOT report security vulnerabilities through public GitHub issues.
When reporting a security vulnerability, please include:
- Description: Clear description of the vulnerability
- Impact: Potential impact and attack scenarios
- Reproduction: Step-by-step reproduction instructions
- Proof of Concept: Code or commands that demonstrate the issue
- Suggested Fix: If you have ideas for remediation
| Timeline | Action |
|---|---|
| 24 hours | Initial acknowledgment |
| 72 hours | Initial assessment and severity classification |
| 7 days | Detailed analysis and reproduction |
| 30 days | Patch development and testing |
| 90 days | Public disclosure (coordinated) |
- Private key compromise or extraction
- Signature forgery vulnerabilities
- Remote code execution
- Complete bypass of cryptographic protections
- Information disclosure of sensitive data
- Denial of service affecting availability
- Privilege escalation
- Side-channel attacks with practical exploitation
- Limited information disclosure
- Timing attacks requiring significant resources
- Input validation bypasses
- Configuration vulnerabilities
- Minor information leaks
- Theoretical attacks with high complexity
- Documentation or example vulnerabilities
- Daily: Automated
cargo auditchecks in CI - Weekly: Manual review of security advisories
- Monthly: Comprehensive dependency updates
pqcrypto-dilithium: NIST-standardized implementationrand: Cryptographically secure randomnesszeroize: Secure memory clearingsubtle: Constant-time operationssolana-program: Blockchain integration
- Assessment: Evaluate security impact
- Testing: Validate in isolated environment
- Integration: Test with full test suite
- Deployment: Staged rollout with monitoring
- Static Analysis:
clippywith security lints - Dependency Scanning:
cargo audit - Fuzzing:
cargo fuzzwith libFuzzer - Side-Channel Analysis: Custom dudect implementation
- Memory Safety: Miri and AddressSanitizer
- Weekly: Extended fuzzing runs (24+ hours)
- Monthly: Performance regression testing
- Quarterly: Third-party security assessment
- Immediate Response: Within 24 hours
- Patch Development: Within 72 hours
- Testing: Accelerated but thorough
- Deployment: Coordinated release
- Notification: Security advisory
- Scheduled Review: Monthly security meetings
- Batch Processing: Group related fixes
- Standard Testing: Full test suite
- Regular Release: Next scheduled version
- Automated monitoring and alerting
- Community reports via security email
- Internal security testing discoveries
- Third-party security research
- Security Lead: Primary coordinator
- Cryptography Expert: Technical analysis
- Solana Specialist: Blockchain-specific issues
- Communications: Public disclosure coordination
- Containment: Immediate threat mitigation
- Analysis: Root cause investigation
- Remediation: Patch development and testing
- Recovery: Deployment and verification
- Lessons Learned: Process improvement
- Quantum attacks (Shor's, Grover's algorithms)
- Classical cryptographic attacks
- Implementation vulnerabilities
- Side-channel attacks (timing, power)
- Memory-based attacks
- Network-based attacks
- Solana-specific attack vectors
- Physical access to hardware
- Social engineering attacks
- Attacks on underlying OS/hardware
- Attacks on Solana network consensus
- Regulatory or compliance issues
- NIST FIPS 204 compliant Dilithium implementation
- Cryptographically secure randomness (OsRng)
- Constant-time operations for side-channel resistance
- Proper key derivation (HKDF-SHA256)
- Secure memory management with zeroization
- Memory-safe Rust implementation
- Comprehensive input validation
- Proper error handling without information leakage
- Extensive automated testing
- Static analysis and fuzzing
- Secure development lifecycle
- Code review requirements
- Automated security testing
- Dependency vulnerability monitoring
- Incident response procedures
- NIST FIPS 204: CRYSTALS-Dilithium standard
- NIST SP 800-90A/B/C: Random number generation
- RFC 5869: HKDF key derivation
- NIST SP 800-57: Key management practices
- Annual third-party security audit
- Quarterly internal security reviews
- Continuous automated testing
- Compliance documentation maintenance
- Security architecture documentation
- Threat model and risk assessment
- Security testing procedures
- Incident response playbooks
We encourage security research and responsible disclosure:
- Coordination: Work with our security team
- Timeline: Allow reasonable time for fixes
- Scope: Focus on in-scope vulnerabilities
- Ethics: Follow responsible disclosure practices
We are evaluating a bug bounty program for:
- Critical and high severity vulnerabilities
- Novel attack vectors or techniques
- Significant security improvements
We welcome collaboration with:
- Post-quantum cryptography researchers
- Blockchain security experts
- Side-channel analysis specialists
- Formal verification researchers
- Security team contact: [email protected]
- Security documentation:
/docs/security.md - Security testing:
/.github/workflows/security.yml - Vulnerability database: Internal tracking system
- NIST Post-Quantum Cryptography
- Solana Security Best Practices
- OWASP Cryptographic Storage Cheat Sheet
- Side-Channel Analysis Resources
Last Updated: 2025-09-26
Next Review: 2025-12-26
Version: 2.0