Skip to content

Conversation

@melund
Copy link
Member

@melund melund commented Jan 19, 2026

No description provided.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the fix label Jan 19, 2026
@melund melund requested a review from bkje14 January 19, 2026 11:32
bkje14
bkje14 previously approved these changes Jan 19, 2026
#endif
#endif
#endif
// // Trigger check for read-only AMMR if we think user is running
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is it the intention to activate this code again when the instability is resolved ?
Could we use the ams version to keep the check for versions below the affected one ?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes. This was my idea. I have only seen the problem a few times on my machine, but I really don't want this to hit random users.

Could we use the ams version to keep the check for versions below the affected one ?
I don't think that is necessary.

Right now, it still calls python if we run AMMR from a Git repo - An other python hook which gets the git-info. I could also disable that by switching the BM configuration. But it would hit some of our models/pipelines which expect it to be there. But that would also only affect advanced users.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for explaining - let's leave it as-is then :)

@melund melund merged commit 3c262ac into master Jan 19, 2026
26 checks passed
@melund melund deleted the no-python-call branch January 19, 2026 14:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants