Skip to content

chore(peer-review): integrate Aczel 2021 anti-reviewer-2 tone patterns#11

Merged
Yoojin-nam merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
feat/peer-review-aczel-tone
May 13, 2026
Merged

chore(peer-review): integrate Aczel 2021 anti-reviewer-2 tone patterns#11
Yoojin-nam merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
feat/peer-review-aczel-tone

Conversation

@Yoojin-nam
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

  • Add references/aczel_2021_reviewer2_patterns.md codifying the do/don't catalog from Aczel et al. 2021 (PMC8505560), with skill-specific transformation examples for medical imaging context.
  • Hook the patterns into SKILL.md Tone Calibration so partner-voice (not gatekeeper-voice) is the default throughout drafting, not just at QC.
  • Extend Phase 4 Self-QC with a 6-point Aczel tone audit: 0 attitude markers, 0 personal attacks, ≥2 first-person rapport, ≥50% hedged Minor requests, ≥2 named strengths, typo nitpicking ≤1.
  • Length proportionality rule: Minor Revision ≤600 words, Major Revision ≤1000 words.

Motivation

EURE-D-26-00203 R1 review revealed that the existing skill produced a structurally sound but tonally generic review — formal "Please [verb]" imperatives throughout, no explicit guard against "Reviewer 2" patterns. Aczel et al. 2021 provides a concrete, verbatim-cited catalog that is now enforceable as a Phase 4 mechanical check.

Test plan

  • validate_skills.sh passes (verified locally via pre-commit hook)
  • SKILL.md reads coherently end-to-end after the inserts
  • References doc is self-contained — Aczel verbatim examples + ≥5 skill-specific transformations + Phase 4 QC additions + escalation criteria
  • Apply on next peer review invitation and confirm the audit catches at least one would-be reviewer-2 pattern

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Adds references/aczel_2021_reviewer2_patterns.md with the verbatim
do/don't catalog and skill-specific transformation examples (medical
imaging context). Hooks into SKILL.md Tone Calibration and Phase 4
Self-QC so the audit runs on every draft, not only at user-prompted
review.

Phase 4 additions: 0 attitude markers, 0 personal attacks, ≥2 first-
person rapport, ≥50% hedged Minor requests, ≥2 named strengths in
General Comments, typo nitpicking ≤1.

Length proportionality rule: Minor Revision ≤600 words; Major
Revision ≤1000 words. Source: Aczel et al., RIPR 2021;6:13
(PMC8505560).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
@Yoojin-nam Yoojin-nam merged commit 26f3e02 into main May 13, 2026
1 check passed
@Yoojin-nam Yoojin-nam deleted the feat/peer-review-aczel-tone branch May 13, 2026 07:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant