feat(self-review): add reviewer-team consistency category K to 10-category screen#32
Merged
Yoojin-nam merged 1 commit intoMay 23, 2026
Conversation
Adds scripts/check_reviewer_team_consistency.py and a new category K
("Reviewer-team consistency", SR/MA-only, fabrication-grade) to
self-review.
The check detects the conjunction of:
- DUAL claim (Methods or PROSPERO: "two reviewers independently",
"dual extractors", etc.), AND
- SINGLE confession (Discussion/Limitations: "single primary reviewer",
"20% sample", "deferred to before submission", "due to resource
constraints").
Either side alone is fine. Both together is read as fabrication-grade
and ends the round. Provides resolution guidance (honest Methods
rewrite OR Limitations rewrite).
Synthetic fixture tests cover clean / Methods+limits / PROSPERO+limits
/ single-only. All 4 pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Yoojin-nam
deleted the
feat/tier1-PR7-self-review-reviewer-team-consistency
branch
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
PR T1-7: self-review reviewer-team consistency check
Title:
feat(self-review): add reviewer-team consistency category K to 10-category screenSummary
Adds
scripts/check_reviewer_team_consistency.pyand a new self-reviewcategory K. Reviewer-team consistency (SR/MA-only, fabrication-grade).
Detects manuscripts that simultaneously claim dual independent reviewers
(Methods + PROSPERO) and confess to single-reviewer execution
(Discussion §Limitations). Either claim alone is fine; the conjunction
is read by reviewers as fabrication-grade and causes rejection.
Motivation
Cross-project precedent (anonymized): a reporting-quality SR-of-AI-tools
manuscript had:
screening and data extraction."
additional reviewer is deferred to before submission."
The conjunction admits in Limitations what Methods denies in narrative
form. Fabrication-grade red flag.
Changes
skills/self-review/scripts/check_reviewer_team_consistency.py—section-aware grep for DUAL patterns (Methods + PROSPERO) vs SINGLE
patterns (Discussion + Limitations).
skills/self-review/SKILL.md:N/A elsewhere)
skills/self-review/tests/test_reviewer_team_consistency.sh— 4 cases(clean / Methods+limits / PROSPERO+limits / single-only).
Test plan
bash skills/self-review/tests/test_reviewer_team_consistency.sh—4/4 PASS
bash scripts/validate_skills.shRelated
/sync-submissionPhase 6 scope drift) — complementarydetection family
/check-reportingintegration)🤖 Generated with Claude Code