Skip to content

Comments

chore: Curate dictionary#2724

Open
anyllmarkevich wants to merge 6 commits intoAutomattic:masterfrom
anyllmarkevich:master
Open

chore: Curate dictionary#2724
anyllmarkevich wants to merge 6 commits intoAutomattic:masterfrom
anyllmarkevich:master

Conversation

@anyllmarkevich
Copy link

@anyllmarkevich anyllmarkevich commented Feb 14, 2026

Issues

Description

Dictionary changes:

  • generalize + B
  • +GIS (+N) (Geographic Information System)
  • USAF + g
  • EU + g

Demo

How Has This Been Tested?

Ensured that all tests passed and checked for proper behavior using just lint.

Checklist

  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have added tests to cover my changes

US/Og
USA/Og
USAF/O
US/ONg
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think /N might only be documented as "noun" but in practice we use it as "common noun" and, unless I'm missing secondary senses, US, USA, and USAF are all proper nouns only. If not that would probably warrants comments being added.

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you so much for the clarification! I was confused about the redundancy of O/N and asked a question in the Discord about it, but that clears it up!

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you so much for the clarification! I was confused about the redundancy of O/N and asked a question in the Discord about it, but that clears it up!

Yeah the structure that it generates is a proper flag inside a noun struct, but that should be regarded as an implementation detail probably. I've definitely changed things pretty similar to that in the past.

Sorry I didn't see the question in the Discord!

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah, that makes sense!
And no worries! It's probably best to discuss this right in the pull request.

generality/~NSg
generalization/~NgS
generalize/~VGdS
generalize/~VGdSB
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice!

girt/NgSVdGJ
girth/NwgSV
girths/N
GIS/N # Geographic Information System
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This one is definitely a proper noun so should have /O rather than /N.

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You're absolutely right. I missed that.

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I did some research online about the exact definition of GIS, and I think the common noun usage might be more common, but I’d love your input. Here are a couple of examples.

Here is Wikipedia’s definition:


A geographic information system (GIS) consists of integrated computer hardware and software that store, manage, analyze, edit, output, and visualize geographic data. Much of this often happens within a spatial database; however, this is not essential to meet the definition of a GIS. In a broader sense, one may consider such a system also to include human users and support staff, procedures and workflows, the body of knowledge of relevant concepts and methods, and institutional organizations.

Here is the USGS definition:

A Geographic Information System (GIS) is a computer system that analyzes and displays geographically referenced information. It uses data that is attached to a unique location.

However, I have heard people use GIS to refer to all the infrastructure that humans have built that performs GIS functions (which I think is a proper noun usage). I think this definition is technically incorrect (for instance, GNSS might be a more accurate term), but it might be worth including, given that it is somewhat common. What do you think? Maybe we should have both /O and /N to cover both usages?

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I also did research and came to the same conclusion. I posted here that I made a wrong assumption and it should only be a common noun /N but I've been having connectivity problems today so it might've got lost?

Copy link
Author

@anyllmarkevich anyllmarkevich Feb 14, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for confirming! I got your previous message, and we're on the same page! :)

girth/NwgSV
girths/N
GIS/N # Geographic Information System
GIS/ON # Geographic Information System
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

D'oh! Sorry about this but I was wrong. I was going to say it would just be a proper noun and not also a common noun. But that's not true. I wrongly assumed it was an official designation/product/etc but upon looking into it I found that it's in fact just a regular abbreviation/acronym/initialization and just a common noun.

Or to be concise, it should be just:

GIS/N

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Don't be sorry! Talking it through clarified things for me! Besides, I've heard it used as a proper noun on multiple occasions, even though that's apparently not entirely correct. I appreciate your help! I'll try to make my next PR less eventful! XD

Copy link
Author

@anyllmarkevich anyllmarkevich left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

All these changes have been implemented or resolved.

@anyllmarkevich anyllmarkevich marked this pull request as ready for review February 14, 2026 17:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants