Skip to content

Added workspace per subscription usage api #22409

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

vishnumathi
Copy link
Contributor

@vishnumathi vishnumathi commented Feb 1, 2023

ARM API Information (Control Plane)

MSFT employees can try out our new experience at OpenAPI Hub - one location for using our validation tools and finding your workflow.

Azure 1st Party Service can try out the Shift Left experience to initiate API design review from ADO code repo. If you are interested, may request engineering support by filling in with the form https://aka.ms/ShiftLeftSupportForm.

Changelog

Add a changelog entry for this PR by answering the following questions:

  1. What's the purpose of the update?
    • new service onboarding
    • new API version
    • update existing version for new feature
    • update existing version to fix swagger quality issue in s360
    • Other, please clarify
  2. When are you targeting to deploy the new service/feature to public regions? Please provide the date or, if the date is not yet available, the month. Feb 2023
  3. When do you expect to publish the swagger? Please provide date or, the the date is not yet available, the month. Feb 2023
  4. By default, Azure SDKs of all languages (.NET/Python/Java/JavaScript for both management-plane SDK and data-plane SDK, Go for management-plane SDK only ) MUST be refreshed with/after swagger of new version is published. If you prefer NOT to refresh any specific SDK language upon swagger updates in the current PR, please leave details with justification here.

Contribution checklist (MS Employees Only):

If any further question about AME onboarding or validation tools, please view the FAQ.

ARM API Review Checklist

Applicability: ⚠️

If your changes encompass only the following scenarios, you should SKIP this section, as these scenarios do not require ARM review.

  • Change to data plane APIs
  • Adding new properties
  • All removals

Otherwise your PR may be subject to ARM review requirements. Complete the following:

  • Check this box if any of the following apply to the PR so that the label "ARMReview" and "WaitForARMFeedback" will be added by bot to kick off ARM API Review. Missing to check this box in the following scenario may result in delays to the ARM manifest review and deployment.

    • Adding a new service
    • Adding new API(s)
    • Adding a new API version
      -[ ] To review changes efficiently, ensure you copy the existing version into the new directory structure for first commit and then push new changes, including version updates, in separate commits. You can use OpenAPIHub to initialize the PR for adding a new version. For more details refer to the wiki.
  • Ensure you've reviewed following guidelines including ARM resource provider contract and REST guidelines. Estimated time (4 hours). This is required before you can request review from ARM API Review board.

  • If you are blocked on ARM review and want to get the PR merged with urgency, please get the ARM oncall for reviews (RP Manifest Approvers team under Azure Resource Manager service) from IcM and reach out to them.

Breaking Change Review Checklist

If you have any breaking changes as defined in the Breaking Change Policy, request approval from the Breaking Change Review Board.

Action: to initiate an evaluation of the breaking change, create a new intake using the template for breaking changes. Additional details on the process and office hours are on the Breaking Change Wiki.

NOTE: To update API(s) in public preview for over 1 year (refer to Retirement of Previews)

Please follow the link to find more details on PR review process.

@openapi-workflow-bot
Copy link

Hi, @vishnumathi Thanks for your PR. I am workflow bot for review process. Here are some small tips.

  • Please ensure to do self-check against checklists in first PR comment.
  • PR assignee is the person auto-assigned and responsible for your current PR reviewing and merging.
  • For specs comparison cross API versions, Use API Specs Comparison Report Generator
  • If there is CI failure(s), to fix CI error(s) is mandatory for PR merging; or you need to provide justification in PR comment for explanation. How to fix?

  • Any feedback about review process or workflow bot, pls contact swagger and tools team. [email protected]

    @openapi-pipeline-app
    Copy link

    openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Feb 1, 2023

    Swagger Validation Report

    ️❌BreakingChange: 1 Errors, 0 Warnings failed [Detail]
    Compared specs (v0.10.5) new version base version
    workspacesPerSubscriptionUsage.json 2021-06-01(dbaa1eb) 2021-06-01(main)
    Rule Message
    1038 - AddedPath The new version is adding a path that was not found in the old version.
    New: Microsoft.Synapse/stable/2021-06-01/workspacesPerSubscriptionUsage.json#L24:5
    ️️✔️Breaking Change(Cross-Version) succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    There are no breaking changes.
    ️️✔️CredScan succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    There is no credential detected.
    ️❌LintDiff: 2 Errors, 5 Warnings failed [Detail]
    Compared specs (v2.2.0) new version base version
    package-composite-v2 package-composite-v2(dbaa1eb) package-composite-v2(main)

    [must fix]The following errors/warnings are introduced by current PR:

    Rule Message Related RPC [For API reviewers]
    XmsPageableForListCalls x-ms-pageable extension must be specified for LIST APIs.
    Location: Microsoft.Synapse/stable/2021-06-01/workspacesPerSubscriptionUsage.json#L25
    RPC-Get-V1-13
    GetCollectionOnlyHasValueAndNextLink Get endpoints for collections of resources must only have the value and nextLink properties in their model.
    Location: Microsoft.Synapse/stable/2021-06-01/workspacesPerSubscriptionUsage.json#L50
    ⚠️ SummaryAndDescriptionMustNotBeSame The summary and description values should not be same.
    Location: Microsoft.Synapse/stable/2021-06-01/workspacesPerSubscriptionUsage.json#L25
    ⚠️ LatestVersionOfCommonTypesMustBeUsed Use the latest version v5 of types.json.
    Location: Microsoft.Synapse/stable/2021-06-01/workspacesPerSubscriptionUsage.json#L35
    ⚠️ LatestVersionOfCommonTypesMustBeUsed Use the latest version v5 of types.json.
    Location: Microsoft.Synapse/stable/2021-06-01/workspacesPerSubscriptionUsage.json#L38
    ⚠️ ParameterNotUsingCommonTypes Not using the common-types defined parameter 'location'.
    Location: Microsoft.Synapse/stable/2021-06-01/workspacesPerSubscriptionUsage.json#L41
    ⚠️ LatestVersionOfCommonTypesMustBeUsed Use the latest version v5 of types.json.
    Location: Microsoft.Synapse/stable/2021-06-01/workspacesPerSubscriptionUsage.json#L57
    ️⚠️Avocado: 1 Warnings warning [Detail]
    Rule Message
    ⚠️ MULTIPLE_API_VERSION The default tag contains multiple API versions swaggers.
    readme: specification/synapse/resource-manager/readme.md
    tag: specification/synapse/resource-manager/readme.md#tag-package-composite-v2
    ️❌SwaggerAPIView: 0 Errors, 0 Warnings failed [Detail]
    ️️✔️TypeSpecAPIView succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    ️️✔️ModelValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for ModelValidation.
    ️️✔️SemanticValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for SemanticValidation.
    ️️✔️PoliCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passed for PoliCheck.
    ️️✔️SpellCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for SpellCheck.
    ️️✔️Lint(RPaaS) succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for Lint(RPaaS).
    ️️✔️PR Summary succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for Summary.
    ️️✔️Automated merging requirements met succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Posted by Swagger Pipeline | How to fix these errors?

    @openapi-workflow-bot openapi-workflow-bot bot added ARMReview WaitForARMFeedback <valid label in PR review process> add this label when ARM review is required labels Feb 1, 2023
    @openapi-pipeline-app
    Copy link

    openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Feb 1, 2023

    Swagger Generation Artifacts

    ️️✔️ApiDocPreview succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
     Please click here to preview with your @microsoft account. 
    ️️✔️SDK Breaking Change Tracking succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

    Breaking Changes Tracking

    ️️✔️ azure-sdk-for-net-track2 succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    • ️✔️Succeeded [Logs] Generate from d1d1116fd9275b227e99df772d1d41a68c943682. SDK Automation 14.0.0
      command	pwsh ./eng/scripts/Automation-Sdk-Init.ps1 ../azure-sdk-for-net_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-net_tmp/initOutput.json
      command	pwsh ./eng/scripts/Invoke-GenerateAndBuildV2.ps1 ../azure-sdk-for-net_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-net_tmp/generateOutput.json
    • ️✔️Azure.ResourceManager.Synapse [View full logs]  [Preview SDK Changes]
      info	[Changelog]
    ️️✔️ azure-sdk-for-js succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    • ️✔️Succeeded [Logs] Generate from d1d1116fd9275b227e99df772d1d41a68c943682. SDK Automation 14.0.0
      command	sh .scripts/automation_init.sh ../azure-sdk-for-js_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-js_tmp/initOutput.json
      warn	File azure-sdk-for-js_tmp/initOutput.json not found to read
      command	sh .scripts/automation_generate.sh ../azure-sdk-for-js_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-js_tmp/generateOutput.json
    • ️✔️@azure/arm-synapse [View full logs]  [Preview SDK Changes]
    ️⚠️ azure-sdk-for-java warning [Detail]
    • ⚠️Warning [Logs] Generate from d1d1116fd9275b227e99df772d1d41a68c943682. SDK Automation 14.0.0
      command	./eng/mgmt/automation/init.sh ../azure-sdk-for-java_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-java_tmp/initOutput.json
      cmderr	[init.sh] [notice] A new release of pip is available: 23.0.1 -> 24.0
      cmderr	[init.sh] [notice] To update, run: pip install --upgrade pip
      cmderr	[init.sh] [notice] A new release of pip is available: 23.0.1 -> 24.0
      cmderr	[init.sh] [notice] To update, run: pip install --upgrade pip
      cmderr	[init.sh] rrent
      cmderr	[init.sh]                                  Dload  Upload   Total   Spent    Left  Speed
      cmderr	[init.sh] 
        0     0    0     0    0     0      0      0 --:--:-- --:--:-- --:--:--     0 1295k
      cmderr	[init.sh] Downloading https://nodejs.org/dist/v18.15.0/node-v18.15.0-linux-x64.tar.xz...
      cmderr	[init.sh] Computing checksum with sha256sum
      cmderr	[init.sh] Checksums matched!
      command	./eng/mgmt/automation/generate.py ../azure-sdk-for-java_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-java_tmp/generateOutput.json
    • ️✔️azure-resourcemanager-synapse [View full logs]  [Preview SDK Changes]
    ️⚠️ azure-sdk-for-python-track2 warning [Detail]
    • ⚠️Warning [Logs] Generate from d1d1116fd9275b227e99df772d1d41a68c943682. SDK Automation 14.0.0
      command	sh scripts/automation_init.sh ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/initOutput.json
      cmderr	[automation_init.sh] WARNING: azure-devtools 1.2.1 does not provide the extra 'ci-tools'
      cmderr	[automation_init.sh] WARNING: azure-devtools 1.2.1 does not provide the extra 'ci-tools'
      cmderr	[automation_init.sh] WARNING: Skipping azure-nspkg as it is not installed.
      command	sh scripts/automation_generate.sh ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/generateOutput.json
      cmderr	[automation_generate.sh] npm notice
      cmderr	[automation_generate.sh] npm notice New minor version of npm available! 10.2.4 -> 10.5.0
      cmderr	[automation_generate.sh] npm notice Changelog: <https://github.com/npm/cli/releases/tag/v10.5.0>
      cmderr	[automation_generate.sh] npm notice Run `npm install -g [email protected]` to update!
      cmderr	[automation_generate.sh] npm notice
    • ️✔️track2_azure-mgmt-synapse [View full logs]  [Preview SDK Changes]
    ️️✔️ azure-sdk-for-go succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    • ️✔️Succeeded [Logs] Generate from d1d1116fd9275b227e99df772d1d41a68c943682. SDK Automation 14.0.0
      command	sh ./eng/scripts/automation_init.sh ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/initInput.json ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/initOutput.json
      command	generator automation-v2 ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/generateInput.json ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/generateOutput.json
    • ️✔️sdk/resourcemanager/synapse/armsynapse [View full logs]  [Preview SDK Changes]
    ️⚠️ azure-resource-manager-schemas warning [Detail]
    • ⚠️Warning [Logs] Generate from d1d1116fd9275b227e99df772d1d41a68c943682. Schema Automation 14.0.0
      command	.sdkauto/initScript.sh ../azure-resource-manager-schemas_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-resource-manager-schemas_tmp/initOutput.json
      cmderr	[initScript.sh]  notice
      cmderr	[initScript.sh] npm notice New minor version of npm available! 10.2.4 -> 10.5.0
      cmderr	[initScript.sh] npm notice Changelog: <https://github.com/npm/cli/releases/tag/v10.5.0>
      cmderr	[initScript.sh] npm notice Run `npm install -g [email protected]` to update!
      cmderr	[initScript.sh] npm notice
      warn	File azure-resource-manager-schemas_tmp/initOutput.json not found to read
      command	.sdkauto/generateScript.sh ../azure-resource-manager-schemas_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-resource-manager-schemas_tmp/generateOutput.json
      warn	No file changes detected after generation
    • ️✔️synapse [View full logs
    ️⚠️ azure-powershell warning [Detail]
    • ⚠️Warning [Logs] Generate from d1d1116fd9275b227e99df772d1d41a68c943682. SDK Automation 14.0.0
      command	sh ./tools/SwaggerCI/init.sh ../azure-powershell_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-powershell_tmp/initOutput.json
      command	pwsh ./tools/SwaggerCI/psci.ps1 ../azure-powershell_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-powershell_tmp/generateOutput.json
    • ⚠️Az.synapse.DefaultTag [View full logs]  [Preview SDK Changes]
    Posted by Swagger Pipeline | How to fix these errors?

    @openapi-workflow-bot
    Copy link

    Hi, @vishnumathi your PR are labelled with WaitForARMFeedback. A notification email will be sent out shortly afterwards to notify ARM review board([email protected]).

    @ghost ghost added the customer-reported Issues that are reported by GitHub users external to the Azure organization. label Feb 1, 2023
    @openapi-pipeline-app
    Copy link

    openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Feb 1, 2023

    Generated ApiView

    Language Package Name ApiView Link
    Go sdk/resourcemanager/synapse/armsynapse Create ApiView failed. Please ensure your github account in Azure/Microsoft is public and add a comment "/azp run" to re-trigger the CI.
    .Net Azure.ResourceManager.Synapse Create ApiView failed. Please ensure your github account in Azure/Microsoft is public and add a comment "/azp run" to re-trigger the CI.
    Java azure-resourcemanager-synapse Create ApiView failed. Please ensure your github account in Azure/Microsoft is public and add a comment "/azp run" to re-trigger the CI.
    JavaScript @azure/arm-synapse Create ApiView failed. To get help, please see [aka.ms/azsdk/pr-getting-help](https://aka.ms/azsdk/pr-getting-help).
    Swagger Microsoft.Synapse Create ApiView failed. Please ensure your github account in Azure/Microsoft is public and add a comment "/azp run" to re-trigger the CI.

    @ghost
    Copy link

    ghost commented Feb 1, 2023

    Thank you for your contribution vishnumathi! We will review the pull request and get back to you soon.

    @openapi-workflow-bot
    Copy link

    NewApiVersionRequired reason:

    A service’s API is a contract with customers and is represented by using the api-version query parameter. Changes such as adding an optional property to a request/response or introducing a new operation is a change to the service’s contract and therefore requires a new api-version value. This is critically important for documentation, client libraries, and customer support.

    EXAMPLE: if a customer calls a service in the public cloud using api-version=2020-07-27, the new property or operation may exist but if they call the service in a government cloud, air-gapped cloud, or Azure Stack Hub cloud using the same api-version, the property or operation may not exist. Because there is no clear relationship between the service api-version and the new property/operation, customers can’t trust the documentation and Azure customer have difficulty helping customers diagnose issues. In addition, each client library version documents the service version it supports. When an optional property or new operation is added to a service and its Swagger, new client libraries must be produced to expose this functionality to customers. Without updating the api-version, it is unclear to customers which version of a client library supports these new features.

    @bansalaseem bansalaseem added the ARMSignedOff <valid label in PR review process>add this label when ARM approve updates after review label Feb 2, 2023
    @openapi-workflow-bot openapi-workflow-bot bot removed the WaitForARMFeedback <valid label in PR review process> add this label when ARM review is required label Feb 2, 2023
    @kazrael2119
    Copy link
    Contributor

    js sdk breaking is not caused by this pr

    @konrad-jamrozik konrad-jamrozik added the VersioningReviewRequired <valid label in PR review process>add this label when versioning review is required label Mar 11, 2024
    Copy link

    openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Mar 11, 2024

    Next Steps to Merge

    Next steps that must be taken to merge this PR:
    • ❌ Your PR has at least one change violating Azure versioning policy (label: VersioningReviewRequired). You must introduce a new API version with these changes instead of modifying an existing one. See the PR description for help.
    • ❌ The required check named Swagger BreakingChange has failed. Refer to the check in the PR's 'Checks' tab for details on how to fix it. In addition, refer to step 1 in the PR workflow diagram (even if your PR is for data plane, not ARM).

    @Alancere
    Copy link
    Contributor

    /azp run

    Copy link

    Azure Pipelines successfully started running 4 pipeline(s).

    @AzureRestAPISpecReview AzureRestAPISpecReview added ARMChangesRequested <valid label in PR review process>add this label when require changes after ARM review and removed ARMSignedOff <valid label in PR review process>add this label when ARM approve updates after review labels Mar 12, 2024
    Copy link

    Please address or respond to feedback from the ARM API reviewer.
    When you are ready to continue the ARM API review, please remove the ARMChangesRequested label.
    This will notify the reviewer to have another look.
    If the feedback provided needs further discussion, please use this Teams channel to post your questions - aka.ms/azsdk/support/specreview-channel.
    Please include [ARM Query] in the title of your question to indicate that it is ARM-related.

    Copy link
    Contributor

    @vishnumathi please read the following Contributor License Agreement(CLA). If you agree with the CLA, please reply with the following information.

    @microsoft-github-policy-service agree [company="{your company}"]
    

    Options:

    • (default - no company specified) I have sole ownership of intellectual property rights to my Submissions and I am not making Submissions in the course of work for my employer.
    @microsoft-github-policy-service agree
    
    • (when company given) I am making Submissions in the course of work for my employer (or my employer has intellectual property rights in my Submissions by contract or applicable law). I have permission from my employer to make Submissions and enter into this Agreement on behalf of my employer. By signing below, the defined term “You” includes me and my employer.
    @microsoft-github-policy-service agree company="Microsoft"
    
    Contributor License Agreement

    Contribution License Agreement

    This Contribution License Agreement (“Agreement”) is agreed to by the party signing below (“You”),
    and conveys certain license rights to Microsoft Corporation and its affiliates (“Microsoft”) for Your
    contributions to Microsoft open source projects. This Agreement is effective as of the latest signature
    date below.

    1. Definitions.
      “Code” means the computer software code, whether in human-readable or machine-executable form,
      that is delivered by You to Microsoft under this Agreement.
      “Project” means any of the projects owned or managed by Microsoft and offered under a license
      approved by the Open Source Initiative (www.opensource.org).
      “Submit” is the act of uploading, submitting, transmitting, or distributing code or other content to any
      Project, including but not limited to communication on electronic mailing lists, source code control
      systems, and issue tracking systems that are managed by, or on behalf of, the Project for the purpose of
      discussing and improving that Project, but excluding communication that is conspicuously marked or
      otherwise designated in writing by You as “Not a Submission.”
      “Submission” means the Code and any other copyrightable material Submitted by You, including any
      associated comments and documentation.
    2. Your Submission. You must agree to the terms of this Agreement before making a Submission to any
      Project. This Agreement covers any and all Submissions that You, now or in the future (except as
      described in Section 4 below), Submit to any Project.
    3. Originality of Work. You represent that each of Your Submissions is entirely Your original work.
      Should You wish to Submit materials that are not Your original work, You may Submit them separately
      to the Project if You (a) retain all copyright and license information that was in the materials as You
      received them, (b) in the description accompanying Your Submission, include the phrase “Submission
      containing materials of a third party:” followed by the names of the third party and any licenses or other
      restrictions of which You are aware, and (c) follow any other instructions in the Project’s written
      guidelines concerning Submissions.
    4. Your Employer. References to “employer” in this Agreement include Your employer or anyone else
      for whom You are acting in making Your Submission, e.g. as a contractor, vendor, or agent. If Your
      Submission is made in the course of Your work for an employer or Your employer has intellectual
      property rights in Your Submission by contract or applicable law, You must secure permission from Your
      employer to make the Submission before signing this Agreement. In that case, the term “You” in this
      Agreement will refer to You and the employer collectively. If You change employers in the future and
      desire to Submit additional Submissions for the new employer, then You agree to sign a new Agreement
      and secure permission from the new employer before Submitting those Submissions.
    5. Licenses.
    • Copyright License. You grant Microsoft, and those who receive the Submission directly or
      indirectly from Microsoft, a perpetual, worldwide, non-exclusive, royalty-free, irrevocable license in the
      Submission to reproduce, prepare derivative works of, publicly display, publicly perform, and distribute
      the Submission and such derivative works, and to sublicense any or all of the foregoing rights to third
      parties.
    • Patent License. You grant Microsoft, and those who receive the Submission directly or
      indirectly from Microsoft, a perpetual, worldwide, non-exclusive, royalty-free, irrevocable license under
      Your patent claims that are necessarily infringed by the Submission or the combination of the
      Submission with the Project to which it was Submitted to make, have made, use, offer to sell, sell and
      import or otherwise dispose of the Submission alone or with the Project.
    • Other Rights Reserved. Each party reserves all rights not expressly granted in this Agreement.
      No additional licenses or rights whatsoever (including, without limitation, any implied licenses) are
      granted by implication, exhaustion, estoppel or otherwise.
    1. Representations and Warranties. You represent that You are legally entitled to grant the above
      licenses. You represent that each of Your Submissions is entirely Your original work (except as You may
      have disclosed under Section 3). You represent that You have secured permission from Your employer to
      make the Submission in cases where Your Submission is made in the course of Your work for Your
      employer or Your employer has intellectual property rights in Your Submission by contract or applicable
      law. If You are signing this Agreement on behalf of Your employer, You represent and warrant that You
      have the necessary authority to bind the listed employer to the obligations contained in this Agreement.
      You are not expected to provide support for Your Submission, unless You choose to do so. UNLESS
      REQUIRED BY APPLICABLE LAW OR AGREED TO IN WRITING, AND EXCEPT FOR THE WARRANTIES
      EXPRESSLY STATED IN SECTIONS 3, 4, AND 6, THE SUBMISSION PROVIDED UNDER THIS AGREEMENT IS
      PROVIDED WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTY OF
      NONINFRINGEMENT, MERCHANTABILITY, OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
    2. Notice to Microsoft. You agree to notify Microsoft in writing of any facts or circumstances of which
      You later become aware that would make Your representations in this Agreement inaccurate in any
      respect.
    3. Information about Submissions. You agree that contributions to Projects and information about
      contributions may be maintained indefinitely and disclosed publicly, including Your name and other
      information that You submit with Your Submission.
    4. Governing Law/Jurisdiction. This Agreement is governed by the laws of the State of Washington, and
      the parties consent to exclusive jurisdiction and venue in the federal courts sitting in King County,
      Washington, unless no federal subject matter jurisdiction exists, in which case the parties consent to
      exclusive jurisdiction and venue in the Superior Court of King County, Washington. The parties waive all
      defenses of lack of personal jurisdiction and forum non-conveniens.
    5. Entire Agreement/Assignment. This Agreement is the entire agreement between the parties, and
      supersedes any and all prior agreements, understandings or communications, written or oral, between
      the parties relating to the subject matter hereof. This Agreement may be assigned by Microsoft.

    Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
    Labels
    Approved-SdkBreakingChange-JavaScript ARMChangesRequested <valid label in PR review process>add this label when require changes after ARM review ARMReview CI-BreakingChange-Go CI-BreakingChange-JavaScript customer-reported Issues that are reported by GitHub users external to the Azure organization. ReadyForApiTest <valid label in PR review process>add this label when swagger and service APIs are ready for test resource-manager Synapses VersioningReviewRequired <valid label in PR review process>add this label when versioning review is required
    Projects
    None yet
    Development

    Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

    9 participants