Skip to content

Swagger Regen Preview from TypeSpec built from 20240703.1 #29693

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Draft
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

azure-sdk
Copy link
Collaborator

Swagger Regen Preview from TypeSpec built from 20240703.1

Copy link

openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Jul 4, 2024

Next Steps to Merge

Next steps that must be taken to merge this PR:
  • ❌ The required check named TypeSpec Requirement (resource-manager) has failed. TypeSpec usage is required for all new (aka "greenfield") services. The automation detected this pull request adds at least one new service that is violating this requirement. For information on converting from OpenAPI specs to TypeSpec specs or on data-plane (DP) policies, refer to aka.ms/azsdk/typespec. If you have general questions on resource provider (RP) policies, refer to aka.ms/rphelp
  • ❌ The required check named TypeSpec Validation has failed. Refer to the check in the PR's 'Checks' tab for details on how to fix it and consult the aka.ms/ci-fix guide

Important checks have failed. As of today they are not blocking this PR, but in near future they will.
Addressing the following failures is highly recommended:
  • ⚠️ The check named TypeSpec Requirement (data-plane) has failed. TypeSpec usage is required for all new (greenfield) services. This is currently enforced as a warning for data-plane specs, but will be made a blocking error in the near future. For information on converting from OpenAPI specs to TypeSpec specs or on data-plane (DP) policies, refer to aka.ms/azsdk/typespec. If you have general questions on resource provider (RP) policies, refer to aka.ms/rphelp

Copy link

openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Jul 4, 2024

Swagger Validation Report

️️✔️BreakingChange succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
There are no breaking changes.
️️✔️Breaking Change(Cross-Version) succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
There are no breaking changes.
️️✔️CredScan succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
There is no credential detected.
️️✔️LintDiff succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for LintDiff.
️️✔️Avocado succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for Avocado.
️️✔️SwaggerAPIView succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
️️✔️TypeSpecAPIView succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
️️✔️ModelValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for ModelValidation.
️️✔️SemanticValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for SemanticValidation.
️️✔️PoliCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passed for PoliCheck.
️️✔️SpellCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for SpellCheck.
️️✔️Lint(RPaaS) succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for Lint(RPaaS).
️️✔️PR Summary succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for Summary.
️️✔️Automated merging requirements met succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Posted by Swagger Pipeline | How to fix these errors?

Copy link

openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Jul 4, 2024

Swagger Generation Artifacts

️️✔️ApiDocPreview succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Posted by Swagger Pipeline | How to fix these errors?

Copy link

PR validation pipeline started successfully. If there is ApiView generated, it will be updated in this comment.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant