Skip to content

Migrate compute latest swagger to TypeSpec #32748

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 94 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

pshao25
Copy link
Member

@pshao25 pshao25 commented Feb 21, 2025

As titled. For the 4 sub services, compute, gallery, disk, sku, migrate their latest version of swagger to Typespec separately.

Copy link

openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Feb 21, 2025

Next Steps to Merge

Next steps that must be taken to merge this PR:
  • ❌ This PR targets either the main branch of the public specs repo or the RPSaaSMaster branch of the private specs repo. These branches are not intended for iterative development. Therefore, you must acknowledge you understand that after this PR is merged, the APIs are considered shipped to Azure customers. Any further attempts at in-place modifications to the APIs will be subject to Azure's versioning and breaking change policies. Additionally, for control plane APIs, you must acknowledge that you are following all the best practices documented by ARM at aka.ms/armapibestpractices. If you do intend to release the APIs to your customers by merging this PR, add the PublishToCustomers label to your PR in acknowledgement of the above. Otherwise, retarget this PR onto a feature branch, i.e. with prefix release- (see aka.ms/azsdk/api-versions#release--branches).
  • ❌ This PR is in purview of the ARM review (label: ARMReview). This PR must get ARMSignedOff label from an ARM reviewer.
    This PR is not ready for ARM review (label: NotReadyForARMReview). This PR will not be reviewed by ARM until relevant problems are fixed. Consult the rest of this Next Steps to Merge comment for details.
    Once the blocking problems are addressed, add to the PR a comment with contents /azp run. Automation will re-evaluate this PR and if everything looks good, it will add WaitForARMFeedback label which will put this PR on the ARM review queue.
    For details of the ARM review, see aka.ms/azsdk/pr-arm-review
  • ❌ This PR is NotReadyForARMReview because it has the BreakingChangeReviewRequired label.
  • ❌ This PR has at least one breaking change (label: BreakingChangeReviewRequired).
    To unblock this PR, follow the process at aka.ms/brch.
  • ❌ The required check named TypeSpec Requirement has failed. Refer to the check in the PR's 'Checks' tab for details on how to fix it and consult the aka.ms/ci-fix guide
  • ❌ The required check named TypeSpec Validation has failed. Refer to the check in the PR's 'Checks' tab for details on how to fix it and consult the aka.ms/ci-fix guide
  • ❌ The required check named SpellCheck has failed. Refer to the check in the PR's 'Checks' tab for details on how to fix it and consult the aka.ms/ci-fix guide

Copy link

openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Feb 21, 2025

PR validation pipeline restarted successfully. If there is ApiView generated, it will be updated in this comment.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the brownfield Brownfield services will soon be required to convert to TypeSpec. See https://aka.ms/azsdk/typespec. label Feb 21, 2025
@AzureRestAPISpecReview AzureRestAPISpecReview added BreakingChangeReviewRequired <valid label in PR review process>add this label when breaking change review is required resource-manager SuppressionReviewRequired TypeSpec Authored with TypeSpec labels Feb 21, 2025
@azure-sdk
Copy link
Collaborator

azure-sdk commented Feb 21, 2025

API Change Check

APIView identified API level changes in this PR and created the following API reviews

Language API Review for Package
Java com.azure.resourcemanager:azure-resourcemanager-compute-generated
JavaScript @azure/arm-compute
Swagger Microsoft.Compute
TypeSpec Microsoft.Compute
Go sdk/resourcemanager/compute/armcompute

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

10 participants