Skip to content

[TSP Migration][edgeorder] TypeSpec migrated from swagger #34238

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 10 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

melina5656
Copy link
Member

@melina5656 melina5656 commented Apr 25, 2025

This PR migrates your latest version (identified by the tag in your readme.md) of swagger to TypeSpec. We already tried our best to make sure the TypeSpec represents same as previous swagger. Since we lack the business knowledge, please validate this PR again to make sure it's functional equivalent as before. The local validation step is at Getting started | TypeSpec Azure

Besides, TypeSpec encourages to follow ARM guidelines. Therefore, some representations in your previous swagger will be fixed to follow these guidelines. When you see differences in your local validation, please keep this note in mind. Here is the list of your anti-pattern:

Please reach out to TypeSpec Discussions Channel if there is any help needed.

Copy link

openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Apr 25, 2025

Next Steps to Merge

Next steps that must be taken to merge this PR:
  • ❌ This PR targets either the main branch of the public specs repo or the RPSaaSMaster branch of the private specs repo. These branches are not intended for iterative development. Therefore, you must acknowledge you understand that after this PR is merged, the APIs are considered shipped to Azure customers. Any further attempts at in-place modifications to the APIs will be subject to Azure's versioning and breaking change policies. Additionally, for control plane APIs, you must acknowledge that you are following all the best practices documented by ARM at aka.ms/armapibestpractices. If you do intend to release the APIs to your customers by merging this PR, add the PublishToCustomers label to your PR in acknowledgement of the above. Otherwise, retarget this PR onto a feature branch, i.e. with prefix release- (see aka.ms/azsdk/api-versions#release--branches).
  • ❌ This PR is in purview of the ARM review (label: ARMReview). This PR must get ARMSignedOff label from an ARM reviewer.
    This PR is not ready for ARM review (label: NotReadyForARMReview). This PR will not be reviewed by ARM until relevant problems are fixed. Consult the rest of this Next Steps to Merge comment for details.
    Once the blocking problems are addressed, add to the PR a comment with contents /azp run. Automation will re-evaluate this PR and if everything looks good, it will add WaitForARMFeedback label which will put this PR on the ARM review queue.
    For details of the ARM review, see aka.ms/azsdk/pr-arm-review
  • ❌ This PR is NotReadyForARMReview because it has the BreakingChangeReviewRequired label.
  • ❌ This PR has at least one breaking change (label: BreakingChangeReviewRequired).
    To unblock this PR, follow the process at aka.ms/brch.
  • ❌ The required check named Swagger BreakingChange has failed. To unblock this PR, follow the process at aka.ms/brch.

Copy link

openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Apr 25, 2025

PR validation pipeline restarted successfully. If there is ApiView generated, it will be updated in this comment.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Apr 25, 2025

API Change Check

APIView identified API level changes in this PR and created the following API reviews

Language API Review for Package
Swagger Microsoft.EdgeOrder
TypeSpec Microsoft.EdgeOrder
Go sdk/resourcemanager/edgeorder/armedgeorder
JavaScript @azure/arm-edgeorder
java com.azure.resourcemanager:azure-resourcemanager-edgeorder

@pshao25 pshao25 marked this pull request as ready for review May 9, 2025 06:57
@AzureRestAPISpecReview AzureRestAPISpecReview added ARMReview NotReadyForARMReview ReadyForApiTest <valid label in PR review process>add this label when swagger and service APIs are ready for test labels May 9, 2025
@AzureRestAPISpecReview AzureRestAPISpecReview removed the ReadyForApiTest <valid label in PR review process>add this label when swagger and service APIs are ready for test label May 10, 2025
@AzureRestAPISpecReview AzureRestAPISpecReview added the ReadyForApiTest <valid label in PR review process>add this label when swagger and service APIs are ready for test label May 12, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ARMReview BreakingChange-Go-Sdk BreakingChange-Python-Sdk BreakingChangeReviewRequired <valid label in PR review process>add this label when breaking change review is required NotReadyForARMReview PipelineBotTrigger ReadyForApiTest <valid label in PR review process>add this label when swagger and service APIs are ready for test resource-manager TypeSpec Authored with TypeSpec typespec-conversion-w1
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants