Skip to content

[TSP Migration]--powerbidedicated #34282

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 12 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

welovej
Copy link
Member

@welovej welovej commented Apr 28, 2025

This PR migrates your latest version (identified by the tag in your readme.md) of swagger to TypeSpec. We already tried our best to make sure the TypeSpec represents same as previous swagger. Since we lack the business knowledge, please validate this PR again to make sure it's functional equivalent as before. The local validation step is at Getting started | TypeSpec Azure

Besides, TypeSpec encourages to follow ARM guidelines. Therefore, some representations in your previous swagger will be fixed to follow these guidelines. When you see differences in your local validation, please keep this note in mind. Here is the list of your anti-pattern:

  • You are not referring common types. We will use common type version v3.
  • For pageable operations, the response model should have nextLink property.

Please reach out to TypeSpec Discussions Channel if there is any help needed.

Copy link

openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Apr 28, 2025

Next Steps to Merge

Next steps that must be taken to merge this PR:
  • ❌ This PR targets either the main branch of the public specs repo or the RPSaaSMaster branch of the private specs repo. These branches are not intended for iterative development. Therefore, you must acknowledge you understand that after this PR is merged, the APIs are considered shipped to Azure customers. Any further attempts at in-place modifications to the APIs will be subject to Azure's versioning and breaking change policies. Additionally, for control plane APIs, you must acknowledge that you are following all the best practices documented by ARM at aka.ms/armapibestpractices. If you do intend to release the APIs to your customers by merging this PR, add the PublishToCustomers label to your PR in acknowledgement of the above. Otherwise, retarget this PR onto a feature branch, i.e. with prefix release- (see aka.ms/azsdk/api-versions#release--branches).
  • ❌ This PR is in purview of the ARM review (label: ARMReview). This PR must get ARMSignedOff label from an ARM reviewer.
    This PR is not ready for ARM review (label: NotReadyForARMReview). This PR will not be reviewed by ARM until relevant problems are fixed. Consult the rest of this Next Steps to Merge comment for details.
    Once the blocking problems are addressed, add to the PR a comment with contents /azp run. Automation will re-evaluate this PR and if everything looks good, it will add WaitForARMFeedback label which will put this PR on the ARM review queue.
    For details of the ARM review, see aka.ms/azsdk/pr-arm-review
  • ❌ This PR is NotReadyForARMReview because it has the BreakingChangeReviewRequired label.
  • ❌ This PR has at least one breaking change (label: BreakingChangeReviewRequired).
    To unblock this PR, follow the process at aka.ms/brch.
  • ❌ The required check named TypeSpec Validation has failed. Refer to the check in the PR's 'Checks' tab for details on how to fix it and consult the aka.ms/ci-fix guide
  • ❌ The required check named SpellCheck has failed. Refer to the check in the PR's 'Checks' tab for details on how to fix it and consult the aka.ms/ci-fix guide

Copy link

openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Apr 28, 2025

PR validation pipeline restarted successfully. If there is ApiView generated, it will be updated in this comment.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Apr 28, 2025

API Change Check

APIView identified API level changes in this PR and created the following API reviews

Language API Review for Package
Swagger Microsoft.PowerBIdedicated
TypeSpec Microsoft.PowerBIDedicated
Go sdk/resourcemanager/powerbidedicated/armpowerbidedicated
JavaScript @azure/arm-powerbidedicated

@AzureRestAPISpecReview AzureRestAPISpecReview removed the VersioningReviewRequired <valid label in PR review process>add this label when versioning review is required label May 15, 2025
@AzureRestAPISpecReview AzureRestAPISpecReview added the BreakingChangeReviewRequired <valid label in PR review process>add this label when breaking change review is required label May 15, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants