Skip to content

Update CODEOWNERS for sdk/storage#39117

Merged
aanubhav-msft merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
storage/update-code-owners
Jun 30, 2026
Merged

Update CODEOWNERS for sdk/storage#39117
aanubhav-msft merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
storage/update-code-owners

Conversation

@aanubhav-msft

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Added new owners for the storage SDK.

Packages impacted by this PR

Issues associated with this PR

Describe the problem that is addressed by this PR

What are the possible designs available to address the problem? If there are more than one possible design, why was the one in this PR chosen?

Are there test cases added in this PR? (If not, why?)

Provide a list of related PRs (if any)

Command used to generate this PR:**(Applicable only to SDK release request PRs)

Checklists

  • Added impacted package name to the issue description
  • Does this PR needs any fixes in the SDK Generator?** (If so, create an Issue in the Autorest/typescript repository and link it here)
  • Added a changelog (if necessary)

Added new owners for the storage SDK.
Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings June 29, 2026 09:39

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR adds four new code owners to the storage SDK entry in .github/CODEOWNERS, expanding ownership of /sdk/storage/ to additional Microsoft team members. It is a configuration-only change with no impact on package code or build/test behavior.

Changes:

  • Added @syeleti-msft, @souravgupta-msft, @tanyasethi-msft, and @gunjansingh-msft to the /sdk/storage/ owners list.

@aanubhav-msft aanubhav-msft merged commit 799887d into main Jun 30, 2026
23 checks passed
@aanubhav-msft aanubhav-msft deleted the storage/update-code-owners branch June 30, 2026 04:36
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants