Skip to content

Conversation

@EZoni
Copy link
Member

@EZoni EZoni commented Dec 20, 2024

Following up on #5387, I think we should also ignore all .rst files in the repository when we decide whether or not to run the CI workflows.

GitHub Actions syntax taken from the examples here (see '**.js' example). Azure syntax to be tested.

If we merge this before #5522, we can test it (i.e., test that CI is skipped) in #5522 after rebasing there.

Copy link
Member

@ax3l ax3l left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thx!

@ax3l ax3l merged commit 49a505b into BLAST-WarpX:development Jan 8, 2025
37 checks passed
ax3l pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 8, 2025
Just fixing a few errors and warnings I found while working on another
documentation PR. Mostly broken links and missing examples.

Merge #5523 first, see
#5522 (comment)
below.
@EZoni EZoni deleted the ci_skip_rst branch January 25, 2025 00:34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

component: tests Tests and CI

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants