Add Fortran language support#577
Open
AaronDavidSchneider wants to merge 3 commits intoBayesWitnesses:masterfrom
Open
Add Fortran language support#577AaronDavidSchneider wants to merge 3 commits intoBayesWitnesses:masterfrom
AaronDavidSchneider wants to merge 3 commits intoBayesWitnesses:masterfrom
Conversation
AaronDavidSchneider
force-pushed
the
fortran
branch
from
b95f10b to
28663e3
Compare
- bug fixing in interpreter
- add code examples
AaronDavidSchneider
changed the title
Author
|
This PR is ready to go as far as it concerns me. I have tested it additionally using the I am looking forward to the review! |
Author
|
Kindly pinging @izeigerman and @StrikerRUS |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is a PR that aims to add fortran language support.
Todo:
Random note: The math functions are transcribed from their C# counterpart using chatGPT. I am excited to see if they are actually correct. Edit: Turns out, that most of it was correct. Only some minor changes were needed. Exciting future.
Closes #575