create function_trucker.lean

[bizid777]

No description provided.

[claude]

Claude finished @bizid777's task —— View job

---

Code Review for PR #120: Create function_trucker.lean

I've reviewed the new file FuncTracker/function_trucker.lean against the requested criteria. Here are my findings:

🚨 Critical Issues:

1. Filename typo: The file is named function_trucker.lean but should likely be function_tracker.lean.

2. Import structure violation: Per CLAUDE.md guidelines, imports MUST come before any syntax elements. The file correctly has the import at the top, which is good.

3. Missing module declaration: The file should be in the FuncTracker namespace like other modules in this directory (see BasicV2.lean).

4. Duplicated functionality: This file appears to duplicate structures already in BasicV2.lean (Status enum, table structures) without proper integration with the existing codebase.

⚠️ Lean 4 Code Quality Issues:

1. Unnecessary reimplementation: The Status enum is already defined in BasicV2.lean with identical values. This creates namespace conflicts.

2. Debug code in production: Lines 76-77 contain #eval showFnName% Nat.add debug code that should be removed or moved to tests.

3. Inconsistent parsing approach: The table parsing macro (lines 78-94) returns a tuple (List.nil, List.nil) which doesn't match the stated goal of creating a proper Table structure.

4. Unused/incomplete code:

   • The showFnName% elaborator (lines 57-75) is defined but not used in the actual table implementation
   • The fn macro (lines 101-102) is defined but doesn't integrate with the table parsing
   • Lines 109-118 show an example table but it evaluates to ([], []) not a proper table structure

5. Type safety issues: The macro returns bare tuples instead of the defined Table structure, breaking type safety.

📋 Missing Requirements:

1. No integration with existing system: Doesn't integrate with the existing FuncTracker infrastructure (BasicV2, GridParserV2, etc.)

2. No tests: No property-based tests using Plausible as recommended in CLAUDE.md

3. No documentation: While there are comments explaining the intent, proper Lean docstrings are missing

4. No lake build verification: Unable to verify if this builds correctly with the rest of the project

✅ Positive Aspects:

1. The attempt to improve function name display is valuable
2. The EnhancedTable structure (lines 129-163) provides useful helper functions
3. The code follows some Lean conventions like using deriving for common typeclasses

🛠️ Recommendations:

1. Fix the filename to function_tracker.lean

2. Integrate with existing code:

   import FuncTracker.BasicV2
   
   namespace FuncTracker
   -- Your code here, extending BasicV2 functionality
   end FuncTracker

3. Remove duplicate definitions and extend existing structures

4. Complete the implementation: The table parsing should actually create proper Table or EnhancedTable instances

5. Add proper tests and ensure lake build passes

6. Consider contributing improvements to BasicV2 directly rather than creating a parallel implementation

🔍 Performance Considerations:

The string-based padding in display function (line 159) could be optimized using String.push instead of creating intermediate lists.

❌ Project Guideline Violations:

• Not following the incremental development approach with named holes
• No use of sorry for incomplete parts as recommended
• Doesn't follow the "pit of success" philosophy - creates confusion with duplicate implementations

This PR needs significant revision before it can be merged. The core idea of improving function name display is good, but it should be implemented as an enhancement to the existing system rather than a parallel implementation.

✅ Review Complete

All requested review criteria have been evaluated. The main recommendation is to integrate this functionality into the existing FuncTracker system rather than creating a parallel implementation.