Remove unused _evaluate and __bool__ methods from Form5Dot17CompressionCheckZProfilesClass1And2 class

[GerjanDorgelo]

Description

Remove unused _evaluate and bool methods from Form5Dot17CompressionCheckZProfilesClass1And2 class

Fixes #910

Type of change

Please delete options that are not relevant.

• Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)

Checklist:

• I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
• I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
• I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
• New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Refactor
  • Removed boolean evaluation methods from the compression check validation component. Validation results will now use default object truthiness behavior instead of explicit evaluation logic, potentially affecting output rendering in dependent features.

_{✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.}

[github-actions]

Thank you so much for contributing to Blueprints!
Your contributions help thousands of engineers work more efficiently and accurately.

Now that you've created your pull request, please don't go away; take a look at the bottom of this page for the automated checks that should already be running. If they pass, great! If not, please click on 'Details' and see if you can fix the problem they've identified. A maintainer should be along shortly to review your pull request and help get it added!

[Copilot]

Pull request overview

This PR removes unused _evaluate and __bool__ methods from the Form5Dot17CompressionCheckZProfilesClass1And2 class. These methods are likely redundant since the class inherits from ComparisonFormula which should provide standard comparison functionality through its base implementation.

• Removed the static _evaluate method that performed the comparison check
• Removed the __bool__ method that enabled truth-checking of instances

---

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

[coderabbitai]

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

Removed two methods (_evaluate and __bool__) from the Form5Dot17CompressionCheckZProfilesClass1And2 class definition in a prompt file. These methods previously computed boolean comparisons and controlled object truthiness evaluation.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Change Summary
Method removals from comparison formula prompt \.github/prompts/comparison_formula\.prompt\.md	Deleted _evaluate(n_ed: KN, n_pl_rd: KN) -> bool static method and __bool__(self) -> bool method from Form5Dot17CompressionCheckZProfilesClass1And2 class

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Poem

🐰 A pair of methods, no more to stay,
Evaluate and bool swept away!
The prompt grows lean, the code runs clean,
Comparison formulas, purified and keen! ✨

Pre-merge checks

✅ Passed checks (5 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check	✅ Passed	The pull request title clearly and specifically describes the main change: removal of two methods from a specific class.
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	The code changes directly address the requirement in issue #910 to delete the _evaluate and bool methods from the comparison prompt.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	All changes are within scope—only the two specified methods are removed from the Form5Dot17CompressionCheckZProfilesClass1And2 class as required.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d7098ef and 4ede063.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• .github/prompts/comparison_formula.prompt.md

💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)

• .github/prompts/comparison_formula.prompt.md

---

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (57654ad) to head (663840a).
⚠️ Report is 4 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##              main      #911   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files          404       404           
  Lines        12798     12798           
=========================================
  Hits         12798     12798           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[Copilot]

Pull request overview

Copilot reviewed 1 out of 1 changed files in this pull request and generated no new comments.

---

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.