Skip to content

DNM: test with protobuf6 #94

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

DNM: test with protobuf6 #94

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

bdraco
Copy link
Member

@bdraco bdraco commented Feb 7, 2025

Copy link

codspeed-hq bot commented Feb 7, 2025

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging #94 will not alter performance

Comparing protobuf6 (35b2b97) with main (f1edae5)

Summary

✅ 1 untouched benchmarks

Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 7, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 69.94%. Comparing base (f1edae5) to head (35b2b97).
Report is 57 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main      #94   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   69.94%   69.94%           
=======================================
  Files           9        9           
  Lines         519      519           
  Branches       43       43           
=======================================
  Hits          363      363           
  Misses        139      139           
  Partials       17       17           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@bdraco bdraco closed this Feb 7, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant