Node20 - and lots of other changes

[CodingJaw]

No description provided.

[RogerHardiman]

this looks great and I almost missed it as the title is Node20 and had no idea there were so many other code changes in here.

[CodingJaw]

thx still trying to figure out how to make the events work. fell free to look around. node20 branch is actually behind if i remember right i think this branch is the latest working codex/implement-onvif-digital-io-and-events

[RogerHardiman]

When I get some spare time I'll start to cherry pick some of the changes into my develop2025 branch and then move them to the master branch from there.

[CodingJaw]

I got a little carried away.

[RogerHardiman]

all changes are welcome. Out of interest, is there a particular VMS you test the changes with

[CodingJaw]

I have not been using vms, I've been running locally in ubuntu or on rpi2 running kali and testing it against my annke NVR.
any suggestions welcome.

[RogerHardiman]

I use Milestone, ONVIF Device Manager on Windows and also use the github "agsh/onvif" NodeJS library, and ONVIER on Android (used to be called ONVIFER but they changed the name)
Plus from time to time I test with IndigoVision, Avigilon and Bosch VMS software but my licences for those expired.

[CodingJaw]

thanks for the info very useful. should i switch to your develop2025 branch to code from? I think im coding from quedale's branch right now as he seemed to have fixed the node20 and implemented extra wsdl files?

[RogerHardiman]

I don't know who quedale is. I'lll try and find the branch

[RogerHardiman]

Please switch to develop2025. It has bug fixes for multiple video sources "eg Panoramic cameras" and is where I'm currently updating RPOS

[CodingJaw]

Quedale https://github.com/Quedale/rpos https://github.com/CodingJaw/rpos/tree/Quedale He added more of the wsdl files witch i had a hard time addressing It's not a mergeable branch from what I could tell. But I think my quedale branch is. . Joseph Winder (407) 374-EASY (3279) ***@***.*** *CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:* This message and any attached documents are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. This communication may contain information that is privileged, confidential, and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, distribution, or copying of this message or its attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy all copies.

…

On Mon, Dec 29, 2025, 2:08 AM Roger Hardiman ***@***.***> wrote: *RogerHardiman* left a comment (BreeeZe/rpos#180) <#180 (comment)> I don't know who quedale is. I'lll try and find the branch — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#180 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AMBHZJJ44RKA6NOXJ2WBEJT4EDHP3AVCNFSM6AAAAACM5UXCE6VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZTMOJVGY2DSNZTGQ> . You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>

[RogerHardiman]

I've cherry-picked a few things (serial port and some Discovery port).
I have lots of questions on the Authentication and will leave that for the moment, and come back to it later. I've seen one other commercial VMS send WS authentication with PasswordText, which is disallowed in the ONVIF Spec, so the VMS programmers got it wrong. (they probably used some SOAP authentication library and did not use it correctly).
For some of the other changes I need to understand more what the issue was you were solving.

I'll continue on with some of the other commits soon.

Thanks for the PR
Roger