Profile β’ Models β’ Prompts β’ Ethics β’ Math
As a data scientist deeply fascinated by the emergence of superintelligence, I believe the path forward requires not just technical excellence but profound ethical grounding. This repository chronicles my journey from statistical foundations to advanced AI systems, guided by the principle that powerful intelligence must be aligned with human values.
The transition from narrow AI to general intelligence will not come from brute force alone. It rests on sound mathematics, careful system design, and the discipline to ship interpretable, controllable, and beneficial models. Every project here reflects ablation studies, fairness audits, and production constraints.
Throughout this journey, humor helps crystallize concepts.
These encode truths about overfitting, the biasβvariance tradeoff, and optimization landscapes.
Understanding models means grasping both their theoretical core and production behavior. Below are practical notes you can rely on when choosing, explaining, and shipping.
Linear regression aims to solve Ξ²* = (Xα΅X)β»ΒΉXα΅y. Multicollinearity breaks invertibility; ridge fixes it via Ξ²* = (Xα΅X + Ξ»I)β»ΒΉXα΅y. Logistic regression models log-odds with cross-entropy loss, solved by iterative optimization.
Production strengths
- Microsecond-class inference; 2) Memory efficiency; 3) Direct interpretability; 4) Easy online learning via SGD; 5) Good calibration.
Advanced moves Elastic Net for sparsity + grouping; basis expansions (polynomials, splines, Fourier) to keep linear-in-parameters while capturing nonlinearity.
Primal: minimize Β½βwβΒ² with yα΅’(wΒ·xα΅’ + b) β₯ 1. Dual with KKT yields sparsity in support vectors. Kernels (polynomial, RBF) make nonlinear decision boundaries tractable without explicit feature maps. Soft margins balance margin width vs training error via C. SMO and approximations (NystrΓΆm, random Fourier features) unlock scale.
Decision trees split by impurity (Gini/entropy). Ensembles fix biasβvariance.
Random Forests: bagging + feature subsampling reduce variance; OOB gives free CV; beware high-cardinality bias in impurity importances.
Gradient Boosting (XGBoost/LightGBM/CatBoost): stagewise additive modeling, second-order optimization (XGB), GOSS and EFB (LGBM), ordered target encoding to prevent leakage (CatBoost). Early stopping is essential.
Networks as compositions of affine transforms and nonlinearities; backprop applies the chain rule efficiently. Vanishing/exploding gradients motivate ReLU, residuals, normalization. BatchNorm stabilizes training. Attention focuses computation; the lottery-ticket hypothesis hints at sparse winning subnets. Generalization benefits from implicit regularization, overparameterization regimes, and hierarchical representations.
Transformers replace recurrence with attention; positional encodings inject order. Scaling laws predict loss improvements; emergent abilities appear at scale. In-context learning suggests algorithmic behavior internal to attention. RLHF and constitutional methods align behavior; mechanistic interpretability studies circuits like induction heads. Deployment needs quantization, distillation, and retrieval grounding to reduce hallucinations.
flowchart LR
subgraph Y2021 [2021 β’ Foundations]
A1[Linear Models] --> A2[Statistical Intuition]
A2 --> A3[Simplicity When It Wins]
end
subgraph Y2022 [2022 β’ Ensembles]
B1[Tree Ensembles] --> B2[Feature Engineering]
end
subgraph Y2023 [2023 β’ Time Series & Causal]
C1[Prophet at Scale] --> C2[Causal Inference]
end
subgraph Y2024 [2024 β’ Deep Learning]
D1[CNNs & Transfer] --> D2[Custom Architectures]
end
subgraph Y2025 [2025 β’ LLMs & RAG]
E1[Hybrid RAG] --> E2[Routers & Tools] --> E3[Prod Orchestration]
end
A3 --> B1 --> C1 --> D1 --> E1
flowchart TD
A[Problem Framing] --> B{Data Type}
B -->|Tabular| C{Target?}
B -->|Text| T[NLP Pipeline]
B -->|Image| I[Computer Vision]
B -->|Time Series| TS[Temporal Models]
C -->|Continuous| D[Regression]
C -->|Categorical| E[Classification]
C -->|None| F[Unsupervised]
D --> G{Dataset Size}
E --> G
G -->|Small <1k| H[Linear Models]
G -->|Medium <100k| J[Tree Ensembles]
G -->|Large >100k| K[Gradient Boosting]
H --> L{Interpretability?}
J --> L
K --> L
L -->|Yes| M[SHAP/LIME]
L -->|No| N[Max Performance]
M --> O[Validation]
N --> O
O --> P{Meets Target?}
P -->|Yes| Q[Deploy & Monitor]
P -->|No| R[Feature Engineering] --> G
F --> S{Goal}
S -->|Grouping| U[Clustering]
S -->|Reduction| V[PCA/UMAP]
S -->|Anomaly| W[Isolation Forest]
Q --> X[A/B Test] --> Y[Monitor Drift] --> Z[Retrain Schedule]
%%{init: {'theme':'base', 'themeVariables': {
'primaryColor':'#FDF3FF',
'primaryBorderColor':'#6B5B95',
'primaryTextColor':'#6E6E80',
'lineColor':'#E8D5FF',
'fontSize':'14px',
'fontFamily':'Inter, ui-sans-serif, system-ui'
}}}%%
flowchart LR
%% --- Subgraphs for visual separation ---
subgraph SG_ROUTER[Routing Layer]
UQ[User Query]:::router --> R[Query Router]:::router
R -->|Simple| L1[Direct LLM]:::direct
R -->|Factual| RAG[RAG Pipeline]:::rag
R -->|Computational| TOOLS[Tool Use]:::tools
R -->|Multi-step| AGENT[Agent Chain]:::agent
end
subgraph SG_RAG[RAG Pipeline]
RAG --> EMB[Embedding Model]:::rag
EMB --> VS[Vector Search]:::rag
VS --> RR[Reranker]:::rag
RR --> CTX[Context Builder]:::rag
end
subgraph SG_TOOLS[Tool Invocation]
TOOLS --> SEL[Tool Selector]:::tools
SEL --> CALC[Calculator]:::tools
SEL --> CODE[Code Runner]:::tools
SEL --> API[External API]:::tools
SEL --> DB[Database Query]:::tools
end
subgraph SG_AGENT[Agentic Execution]
AGENT --> DEC[Task Decomposer]:::agent
DEC --> EXEC[Step Executor]:::agent
EXEC --> SM[State Manager]:::agent
SM --> EXEC
end
%% Response aggregation and safety
L1 --> RESP[Response Builder]:::output
CTX --> RESP
CALC --> RESP
CODE --> RESP
API --> RESP
DB --> RESP
SM --> RESP
RESP --> SAFE[Safety Checker]:::safety
SAFE --> OUT[Format & Return]:::output
%% --- Styles (pastel palette) ---
classDef router fill:#FDF3FF,stroke:#6B5B95,stroke-width:2px,color:#6E6E80;
classDef rag fill:#E8D5FF,stroke:#6B5B95,stroke-width:2px,color:#6E6E80;
classDef tools fill:#A8E6CF,stroke:#6B5B95,stroke-width:2px,color:#6E6E80;
classDef agent fill:#F6EAFE,stroke:#6B5B95,stroke-width:2px,color:#6E6E80;
classDef safety fill:#FFE4F1,stroke:#6B5B95,stroke-width:2px,color:#6E6E80;
classDef output fill:#FFCFE7,stroke:#6B5B95,stroke-width:2px,color:#6E6E80;
classDef direct fill:#FFCFE7,stroke:#6B5B95,stroke-width:2px,color:#6E6E80;
%% --- Link styling for a bit more contrast ---
linkStyle default stroke:#CBB7FF,stroke-width:1.5px
A set of prompts I actually use, progressing from interpretation to system stewardship.
Given model prediction [PREDICTION] for input [FEATURES]:
Mathematical Decomposition
1) Linear contributions Ξ£(Ξ²α΅’Β·xα΅’) with ranks
2) Interaction effects (top pairs) and intuition
3) Nonlinear transforms used (polys/splines/kernels)
4) Uncertainty: 95% CI + aleatory vs epistemic
Business Translation
- Map coefficients to business impact
- Controllable vs uncontrollable factors
- Counterfactuals to reach [TARGET]
- Sensitivity (βprediction/βfeature) and break-even
- Assumption checks (residuals, QβQ)
Systematic Failure Analysis for [MODEL]
Uncertainty Types
- Aleatory: noise, randomness, ensemble spread
- Epistemic: sparse regions, OOD, NN distance
- Approximation: capacity limits, residual patterns
Failure Mining
- Cluster errors (DBSCAN/HDBSCAN)
- Subgroup discovery (WRAcc/lift)
- Temporal drift (seasonality, CUSUM)
- Adversarial probes
Root Causes
- Shift metrics: KL, Wasserstein, MMD
- Label issues: confident errors, agreement
- Feature gaps: interactions, nonlinearity
- Causal confounding, selection, measurement bias
Design routing for:
- Fast: latency=[X]ms, acc=[Y]%, cost=$[Z]
- Accurate: latency=[A]ms, acc=[B]%, cost=$[C]
- Specialists: [DOMAINS]
Constraints
- P50 < [L1]ms, P99 < [L2]ms
- Budget: $[BUDGET]/1M requests
- Min accuracy: [MIN_ACC]%
Policy
1) Calibrated confidence thresholds
2) Complexity scoring (length/vocab/structure)
3) Dynamic batching; early-exit cascade
4) Failover + monitoring SLO dashboards
Output: decision tree, thresholds, expected metrics.
Requirements
- Scale: [QPS], Storage: [TB]
- SLA: [UPTIME]%, P99: [LATENCY]ms
- Compliance: [GDPR/CCPA/...]
Training
- Data versioning (DVC), feature store
- Tracking (MLflow/W&B), distributed training
Serving
- Registry, canary/A-B, batch vs real-time features
- Cache by query pattern
Monitoring
- Drift (PSI/KS/MMD), reliability (ECE/Brier)
- System: latency percentiles, errors, throughput
Rollbacks
- Auto thresholds + manual incident triggers
Auditability
- Lineage, decision logs, explainability API
- Multi-region rollout, shadow testing, cost controls
Task / Data | Recommended Models | Why it works | Common pitfalls |
---|---|---|---|
Tabular (mixed types, <100k rows) | LightGBM / CatBoost | Handles categoricals, fast, strong defaults | Target leakage, overfitting without early stop |
Tabular (wide pβ«n) | Logistic/Linear + Elastic Net | Sparse and grouped solutions | Scale/standardize, watch collinearity |
Unsupervised segmentation | K-Means / GMM / DBSCAN | Speed / probs / arbitrary shapes | K selection, eps/minPts sensitivity |
Forecasting (business, holidays) | Prophet / SARIMA | Changepoints, seasonality, intervals | Multi-seasonality tuning, data hygiene |
Images | Transfer learning (ResNet/ViT) | Pretrained features, rapid convergence | Overfit small data, require augmentation |
Text | Transformers (HF) + RAG | Context length + grounding | Retrieval chunking, latency, eval complexity |
Hybrid QA / dynamic knowledge | RAG + reranker + LLM | Fresh knowledge, citations, reduced halluc. | Retriever quality bottleneck |
Problem Definition |
---|
β Stakeholders identified (including impacted groups) β Success metrics include fairness, not just accuracy β Risks and mitigations documented β Non-ML alternatives considered |
Data & Provenance |
---|
β Collection process and biases documented β Representation gaps identified β Label quality and agreement checked β Privacy preserved; PII handled appropriately |
Training & Evaluation |
---|
β Leakage-safe splits; groups present in all splits β Metrics per demographic and intersections β Temporal validation mirrors deployment β Power analysis for key decisions Note: validate fairness before celebrating accuracy. |
Subgroup Performance |
---|
β Confusion matrices per group β Worst-group metrics highlighted β Significance tests with corrections β Confidence intervals for small groups |
Calibration & Reliability |
---|
β Reliability plots per group β ECE / Brier scores reported β Over/under-confidence patterns documented |
Interventions |
---|
β Pre: Reweighting / augmentation β In: Constraints / adversarial debiasing β Post: Thresholds / recalibration β Trade-offs made explicit |
Human-in-the-Loop (HITL) |
---|
β Escalation paths for edge cases β Human review for high-stakes outputs β UI avoids automation bias β Feedback closes the loop |
Monitoring |
---|
β Fairness metrics in production dashboards β Alerts on subgroup degradation β Regular audits scheduled β User feedback with SLAs |
Audit Trail |
---|
β Model / data / config versioning β Decision logs retained β Explainability API for challenges β Model and dataset cards maintained |
- Scikit-learn β https://scikit-learn.org
- XGBoost β https://xgboost.ai
- LightGBM β https://lightgbm.readthedocs.io
- CatBoost β https://catboost.ai
- Statsmodels β https://www.statsmodels.org
- Prophet β https://facebook.github.io/prophet/
- PyTorch β https://pytorch.org
- TensorFlow/Keras β https://www.tensorflow.org
- Hugging Face Transformers β https://huggingface.co/docs/transformers
- FAISS β https://github.com/facebookresearch/faiss
- LangChain β https://python.langchain.com
- Haystack β https://docs.haystack.deepset.ai
- ONNX β https://onnx.ai
- OpenVINO β https://docs.openvino.ai
PearlMind-ML-Journey/
βββ assets/ # GIF/SVG/Lottie animations, banners
βββ data/ # raw/processed/features/cache
βββ models/ # baseline/experiments/production/registry
βββ notebooks/ # exploration/modeling/evaluation/reports
βββ src/
β βββ data/{loaders,processors,validators,splitters}.py
β βββ features/{extractors,transformers,store}.py
β βββ models/{baseline,ensemble,neural,hybrid}.py
β βββ evaluation/{metrics,fairness,calibration,monitoring}.py
β βββ deployment/{serving,preprocessing,postprocessing,monitoring}.py
β βββ utils/{config,logging,profiling,visualization}.py
βββ tests/{unit,integration,inference,fixtures}
βββ configs/{model_configs,feature_configs,deployment_configs,monitoring_configs}
βββ scripts/{train.py,evaluate.py,deploy.py,monitor.py}
βββ docs/{model_cards,api,guides,decisions}
βββ .github/workflows/{ci.yml,cd.yml,monitoring.yml}
βββ requirements/{base.txt,dev.txt,test.txt,prod.txt}
βββ Dockerfile
βββ Makefile
βββ pyproject.toml
βββ README.md
python -m venv .venv && source .venv/bin/activate
pip install --upgrade pip
pip install -r requirements/base.txt
jupyter lab
import matplotlib as mpl
palette = {
"blossom": "#FFCFE7",
"lilac": "#F6EAFE",
"lavender":"#6B5B95",
"mint": "#A8E6CF",
"fog": "#FDF3FF",
"dusk": "#6E6E80",
}
mpl.rcParams.update({
"figure.facecolor": palette["fog"],
"axes.facecolor": palette["fog"],
"axes.edgecolor": palette["dusk"],
"axes.labelcolor": palette["dusk"],
"xtick.color": palette["dusk"],
"ytick.color": palette["dusk"],
"grid.color": palette["lilac"],
"grid.alpha": 0.6,
"axes.grid": True,
})
I am Cazandra Aporbo, a data scientist focused on building systems that work in the real world. This repository represents years of learning, disciplined experimentation, and ethical reflection. The north star is simple: the most valuable model is the one that solves the problem responsibly.
47 Production Models |
1,247 Experiments Run |
23 Papers Implemented |
100% Ethics Compliance |