Skip to content

chore: change deps review to fail on moderate#47

Merged
mrTuomoK merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
deps-review-fail-on-moderate
Jul 6, 2026
Merged

chore: change deps review to fail on moderate#47
mrTuomoK merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
deps-review-fail-on-moderate

Conversation

@mrTuomoK

@mrTuomoK mrTuomoK commented Jul 6, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The previous fail-on-severity: low was a bit too aggressive -> moderate

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Adjusted automated dependency checks so the build only fails for moderate or higher-severity issues, reducing unnecessary failures from lower-severity alerts.

@mrTuomoK mrTuomoK requested a review from mikkojamG July 6, 2026 06:10
@mrTuomoK mrTuomoK requested a review from a team as a code owner July 6, 2026 06:10
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jul 6, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Review Change Stack

Warning

Review limit reached

@mrTuomoK, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.

Next review available in: 55 minutes

Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available.
You're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 690c838d-f45c-4f38-9e0c-3d7e65057de9

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 57e8a95 and 836c86b.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • .github/workflows/ci-node.yml
  • .github/workflows/ci-pnpm-node.yml
📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The dependency-review job in the CI workflow's fail-on-severity setting was changed from "low" to "moderate," altering the threshold at which the workflow fails due to dependency vulnerabilities.

Changes

CI Dependency Review Threshold

Layer / File(s) Summary
Severity threshold update
.github/workflows/ci-pnpm-node.yml
Changed fail-on-severity input for actions/dependency-review-action from low to moderate.

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~2 minutes

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers: mikkojamG, nicobav

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5
✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title accurately summarizes the workflow change to raise dependency review failure threshold to moderate.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch deps-review-fail-on-moderate

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@coderabbitai coderabbitai Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.

Inline comments:
In @.github/workflows/ci-pnpm-node.yml:
- Line 268: The dependency-review threshold in the pnpm/node workflow is now
looser than the matching reusable CI workflows, creating inconsistent security
gating. Update the `fail-on-severity` setting in the `dependency-review` step of
`ci-pnpm-node.yml` to match the same bar used by `ci-node.yml` and
`ci-django-api.yml`, or make the divergence explicit and consistent across the
related workflow definitions.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)

Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:

  • Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
  • Create a new PR with the fixes

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 205d41a0-c8b4-495c-9c1e-af8f8a44aa40

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 77d8d34 and 57e8a95.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/ci-pnpm-node.yml

Comment thread .github/workflows/ci-pnpm-node.yml
@mrTuomoK mrTuomoK force-pushed the deps-review-fail-on-moderate branch from 57e8a95 to 836c86b Compare July 6, 2026 06:15
@mrTuomoK mrTuomoK merged commit 991185b into main Jul 6, 2026
26 checks passed
@mrTuomoK mrTuomoK deleted the deps-review-fail-on-moderate branch July 6, 2026 07:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants