chore: change deps review to fail on moderate#47
Conversation
|
Warning Review limit reached
Next review available in: 55 minutes Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available. How can I continue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews. How do review limits work?CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability. For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window. Please refer docs for additional details. Review details⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: defaults Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (2)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe dependency-review job in the CI workflow's fail-on-severity setting was changed from "low" to "moderate," altering the threshold at which the workflow fails due to dependency vulnerabilities. ChangesCI Dependency Review Threshold
Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~2 minutes Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers: 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Inline comments:
In @.github/workflows/ci-pnpm-node.yml:
- Line 268: The dependency-review threshold in the pnpm/node workflow is now
looser than the matching reusable CI workflows, creating inconsistent security
gating. Update the `fail-on-severity` setting in the `dependency-review` step of
`ci-pnpm-node.yml` to match the same bar used by `ci-node.yml` and
`ci-django-api.yml`, or make the divergence explicit and consistent across the
related workflow definitions.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: defaults
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Run ID: 205d41a0-c8b4-495c-9c1e-af8f8a44aa40
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
.github/workflows/ci-pnpm-node.yml
57e8a95 to
836c86b
Compare
The previous
fail-on-severity: lowwas a bit too aggressive ->moderateSummary by CodeRabbit