Merged
Conversation
TaliCohn
reviewed
Mar 9, 2025
Member
TaliCohn
left a comment
TaliCohn
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I'm debating if better to write "implementations" instead of "paper implementations". What do you think?
Collaborator
Author
I agree, implementations is better, will fix |
|
Check out this pull request on See visual diffs & provide feedback on Jupyter Notebooks. Powered by ReviewNB |
TaliCohn
approved these changes
Mar 9, 2025
|
🔥 Incredible, @orsa-classiq! You've merged your 21th PR! 🎯🎊 Your ongoing commitment to classiq-library is truly remarkable. You're a driving force in our community! 🚀 We are grateful for your dedication! 💫 |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
No description provided.