Open
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Purpose
We have too much permafrost in our models, and this seems to be affecting runoff. The surface runoff is much too high in high northern latitudes where permafrost is present.
If this is the case, the snow is not insulating the soil well enough, or the snow temp is problematic.
This PR adds a free parameter (replacing a hardcoded parameter) which controls the snow conductance at the bottom of the snowpack. This in combination with the snow surface temp parameterization from Andy may help with the permafrost problem
White area is permafrost in the model not present in the data:


Surface runoff bias (red = overprediction by model)
To-do
Content