Skip to content

Setup code scanning alerts #80

Open
koletzilla wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
koletzilla-patch-1
Open

Setup code scanning alerts #80
koletzilla wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
koletzilla-patch-1

Conversation

@koletzilla

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

  • Create codeql.yml to make CodeQL Analysis (from Github) analyse this codebase

Checklist

Delete items not relevant to your PR:

  • Unit and integration tests covering the common scenarios were added
  • A human-readable description of the changes was provided to include in CHANGELOG
  • For significant changes, documentation in https://github.com/ClickHouse/clickhouse-docs was updated with further explanations or tutorials

@github-advanced-security

Copy link
Copy Markdown

You are seeing this message because GitHub Code Scanning has recently been set up for this repository, or this pull request contains the workflow file for the Code Scanning tool.

What Enabling Code Scanning Means:

  • The 'Security' tab will display more code scanning analysis results (e.g., for the default branch).
  • Depending on your configuration and choice of analysis tool, future pull requests will be annotated with code scanning analysis results.
  • You will be able to see the analysis results for the pull request's branch on this overview once the scans have completed and the checks have passed.

For more information about GitHub Code Scanning, check out the documentation.

@codecov

codecov Bot commented Mar 23, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.

📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know!

# Prefix the list here with "+" to use these queries and those in the config file.

# For more details on CodeQL's query packs, refer to: https://docs.github.com/en/code-security/code-scanning/automatically-scanning-your-code-for-vulnerabilities-and-errors/configuring-code-scanning#using-queries-in-ql-packs
# queries: security-extended,security-and-quality

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why did we decide to comment this out?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not a strong opinion tbh, but thought it would be better to start with something more lean first, make sure it work, and then iterate to make it more stronger (and iteratively also fix issues that may arise in the process)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants