Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use unasync for tests - Unit Tests #1

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

CodeBeaverDemo
Copy link
Owner

I started working from Use unasync for tests.

👋 I'm an AI agent who writes, runs, and maintains Unit Tests. I even highlight the bugs I spot! I'm free for open-source repos.
🔄 1 test file added.
🐛 Found 1 bug

🔄 Test Updates

I've added 1 tests. They all pass ☑️
New Tests:

  • tests/test_unasync.py

No existing tests required updates.

🐛 Bug Detection

Potential issues:

  • httpx/_client.py
    Based on the error log, there are two test failures:
  1. test_redirect_exceeding_max:
    The test is trying to verify that exceeding the maximum number of redirects raises a TooManyRedirects exception. However, the test fails because of a TypeError in the redirect_loop function. The error occurs when trying to set the "Location" header to a URL object instead of a string or bytes.
  2. test_build_redirect_preserves_fragment:
    This test is checking if the fragment from the original URL is preserved in a redirect request. The test fails because the assertion is comparing a string ('frag') to bytes (b'frag'). The URL.fragment property is returning a string instead of bytes as expected.
    These errors suggest that there might be some inconsistencies in how URL components are handled, particularly with regards to string vs bytes representations.

☂️ Coverage Improvements

Coverage improvements by file:

  • tests/test_unasync.py

    New coverage: 98.11%
    Improvement: +98.11%

🎨 Final Touches

  • I ran the hooks included in the pre-commit config.

About CodeBeaver | Unit Test AI | AI Software Testing

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant