N°9340 - fix: Align FiberChannelInterface and LogicalInterface with PhysicalInterface naming

[Hipska]

Base information

Question	Answer
Related to a SourceForge thread / Another PR / Combodo ticket?	N/A
Type of change?	Translations

Objective

Align the naming of FiberChannelInterface and LogicalInterface interfaces to be consistent with PhysicalInterface naming. This will make ordering more logical when listing network interfaces.

Proposed solution

Add missing dictionary entries.

No unit test as it are just dictionary items.

Checklist before requesting a review

• I have performed a self-review of my code
• I have tested all changes I made on an iTop instance
• I have added a unit test, otherwise I have explained why I couldn't
• Is the PR clear and detailed enough so anyone can understand digging in the code?

[xtophe38]

That makes sense.

[jf-cbd]

Accepted in functional review.
To make it easier to review, would it be possible to add before/after screenshots or description please ?

[Hipska]

Well, the naming will be Device Interface instead of Interface Device.

[Hipska]

Also resolved the conflict..

[Hipska]

@Lenaick Please don't force push develop or the support branches, this fucks up other people's work.

[Molkobain]

@Lenaick Please don't force push develop or the support branches, this fucks up other people's work.

This was clearly a mistake as we forbid to force-push on develop|support/x.x branches :/
We are actually looking into protecting these branches to avoid this.

[jf-cbd]

Thanks @Hipska for your contribution :)

[Lenaick]

@Hipska Sorry, that was my mistake :/ I must not have been paying attention when processing my branches with my IDE... I'll be more careful !