fix: App Mode input panel pushed offscreen when output gallery becomes horizontally scrollable

[another-chi]

Summary

Fix for #14908. I was able to reproduce the bug and it made using the app view quite annoying. I applied the fix mentioned in the bug report. After some testing, it actually solved the problem.

Changes

• What: Adding win-w-0 property to the styling of the splitter element.

Review Focus

I am not that familiar with working on frontends. The fix I applied was mentioned by the reporter who found it when debugging with ChatGPT according to their issue description. I worked on the issue because it annoyed me for quite a while. Therefore, if there is a more appropriate way to fix this issue, please let me know, so I can adjust my fix accordingly.

Fixes #14908
Fixes #15132 (duplicate of #14809)
Fixes #15133 (duplicate of #14809)

[github-actions]

✅ All contributors have signed the CLA. Thank you! This PR is ready to be merged.
_{Posted by the CLA Assistant Lite bot.}

[github-actions]

🎭 Playwright: ⏳ Running...

🎨 Storybook: 🚧 Building...

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 0d71f93e-aece-4a06-8653-b9e0abeba277

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a2603c5 and c919dff.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• src/views/LinearView.vue

Included review availability: Your plan provides up to 4 included reviews per hour; 3 remain after this review.

---

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The linear view adds min-w-0 to the splitter container. This allows the container to shrink within the flex layout.

Changes

Splitter layout

Layer / File(s)	Summary
Enable splitter shrinking src/views/LinearView.vue	The splitter container adds min-w-0 while retaining its existing flex, sizing, border, and background classes.

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~5 minutes

Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to c919d

This localized styling change addresses the App Mode layout issue without introducing any actionable merge-blocking risk; it is merge-ready after normal checks and review.

Suggested reviewers: pythongosssss

---

Important

Pre-merge checks failed

Please resolve all errors before merging. Addressing warnings is optional.

❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
End-To-End Regression Coverage For Fixes	❓ Inconclusive	The review context does not provide the PR title or commit subjects, so the required bug-fix signal cannot be verified.	Provide the PR title and commit subjects, plus the complete base...head changed-file list.

✅ Passed checks (6 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Title check	✅ Passed	The title clearly identifies the App Mode layout bug and the affected input panel.
Description check	✅ Passed	The description explains the bug, the implemented fix, review focus, and linked issues; it contains a minor property-name typo.
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	The min-w-0 change directly addresses the linked issues by constraining the splitter and keeping the right-side panel visible.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	The one-line change is focused on the reported App Mode layout issues and introduces no unrelated modifications.
Website End-To-End Regression Coverage	✅ Passed	The PR changes src/views/LinearView.vue, not apps/website/src/ or apps/website/public/. The website-specific check does not apply.
Adr Compliance For Entity/Litegraph Changes	✅ Passed	The changed-file list contains only src/views/LinearView.vue, which is outside the specified litegraph, ECS, and graph-entity paths.

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[another-chi]

I have read and agree to the Contributor License Agreement

[another-chi]

It seems like some workflows require approval from a maintainer. I have no permissions to do that. I would be grateful if somebody with permissions could help out here.

[coderabbitai]

Note

GitHub couldn't provide a complete incremental comparison for this pull request, so CodeRabbit is performing a full review instead. This review may take a little longer.