Skip to content

Added support for spacing to smart sprite layouts. #1314

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Added support for spacing to smart sprite layouts. #1314

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

j4james
Copy link

@j4james j4james commented Jun 8, 2013

This makes no changes to the RowFitter calculations - it merely adds spacing around the sprites after they've already been divided into rows. As a result, this could potentially generate a suboptimal layout given the right combination of images and spacing settings, but I suspect that would be fairly unlikely in most use cases. If it is deemed to be a major issue, the RowFitter algorithm could always be optimised at a later stage.

@jdmarshall
Copy link

I have been having the same issue and I would love to see/help this get merged.

@simonrenoult
Copy link

Hi,
Is there some news about this issue ? I would also love to this see this get merged !

@estahn
Copy link

estahn commented Oct 28, 2013

👍

@ghost ghost assigned scottdavis Dec 3, 2013
@chriseppstein
Copy link
Member

I'm closing this PR because there's been too much change since it was initially submitted. Sorry, We're going to do better going forward. Hopefully, someone can resubmit the change against 1.0. Features should be submitted to the master branch, bug fixes to the stable branch.

@scottdavis has extracted sprites to a plugin and we'll be releasing that in 1.1. This needs to be patch on top of his work which should land soon.

@chriseppstein
Copy link
Member

Should be on top of the changes coming in #1771.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants