Skip to content

Conversation

@l-georg
Copy link

@l-georg l-georg commented Dec 9, 2025

Removed duplicate SpecifiedTradeSettlementPaymentMeans section.

Removed duplicate SpecifiedTradeSettlementPaymentMeans section.
@phax
Copy link
Collaborator

phax commented Dec 9, 2025

Makes sense to me. BG-16 has a cardinality of 0..1

@phax phax added the Format CII label Dec 9, 2025
@AndreasPvd
Copy link
Contributor

Yes, there is a duplication, although no error in the example itself. BG-16 is not relevant for this case as BG-17 is 0..n. As a result, if the two IBANs were different, it would be a completely valid example according to CEN/TS-16931-3-3. But yes, in this case, please remove the duplicate and accept the pull request.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants