Fix non-hermetic env var leaks in serverless-init and otel-agent tests#54096
Fix non-hermetic env var leaks in serverless-init and otel-agent tests#54096chouquette wants to merge 2 commits into
Conversation
…nstrumented The test asserted JAVA_TOOL_OPTIONS equals exactly the java agent flag, but never reset the env var first. instrumentJava() appends to whatever JAVA_TOOL_OPTIONS already holds, so on runners where it's pre-populated (e.g. with proxy settings) the test fails. Failing job: https://gitlab.ddbuild.io/DataDog/datadog-agent/-/jobs/1889811399
Several proxy-related tests didn't reset HTTP_PROXY/HTTPS_PROXY/NO_PROXY (or their DD_PROXY_* equivalents) before running, so they picked up whatever the runner's real environment had set and failed. Unset rather than set to "": LoadProxyFromEnv treats a present-but-empty var as set, so setting DD_PROXY_HTTP="" would still short-circuit the fallback to HTTP_PROXY even when a test explicitly sets it. Failing job: https://gitlab.ddbuild.io/DataDog/datadog-agent/-/jobs/1890231814
|
🎯 Code Coverage (details) 🔗 Commit SHA: 19dbe59 | Docs | Datadog PR Page | Give us feedback! |
Files inventory check summaryFile checks results against ancestor 3b9e745b: Results for datadog-agent_7.83.0~devel.git.371.19dbe59.pipeline.126785126-1_amd64.deb:No change detected |
Static quality checks✅ Please find below the results from static quality gates 33 successful checks with minimal change (< 2 KiB)
|
Regression DetectorRegression Detector ResultsMetrics dashboard Baseline: 3b9e745 Optimization Goals: ❌ Regression(s) detected
|
| perf | experiment | goal | Δ mean % | Δ mean % CI | trials | links |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ❌ | quality_gate_logs | % cpu utilization | +6.56 | [+5.50, +7.62] | 1 | Logs bounds checks dashboard |
| ➖ | quality_gate_idle | memory utilization | +0.28 | [+0.23, +0.33] | 1 | Logs bounds checks dashboard |
| ➖ | quality_gate_private_action_runner | memory utilization | +0.19 | [+0.07, +0.31] | 1 | Logs bounds checks dashboard |
| ➖ | quality_gate_security_idle | memory utilization | +0.15 | [+0.09, +0.21] | 1 | Logs bounds checks dashboard |
| ➖ | quality_gate_security_mean_fs_load | memory utilization | +0.14 | [+0.11, +0.18] | 1 | Logs bounds checks dashboard |
| ➖ | quality_gate_idle_all_features | memory utilization | -0.05 | [-0.09, -0.00] | 1 | Logs bounds checks dashboard |
| ➖ | quality_gate_security_no_fs_load | memory utilization | -0.34 | [-0.44, -0.25] | 1 | Logs bounds checks dashboard |
| ➖ | quality_gate_metrics_logs | memory utilization | -0.63 | [-0.87, -0.39] | 1 | Logs bounds checks dashboard |
Bounds Checks: ✅ Passed
| perf | experiment | bounds_check_name | replicates_passed | observed_value | links |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ✅ | quality_gate_idle | intake_connections | 10/10 | 3 ≤ 4 | bounds checks dashboard |
| ✅ | quality_gate_idle | memory_usage | 10/10 | 151.34MiB ≤ 154MiB | bounds checks dashboard |
| ✅ | quality_gate_idle | total_bytes_received | 10/10 | 735.43KiB ≤ 819.20KiB | bounds checks dashboard |
| ✅ | quality_gate_idle_all_features | intake_connections | 10/10 | 3 ≤ 4 | bounds checks dashboard |
| ✅ | quality_gate_idle_all_features | memory_usage | 10/10 | 499.21MiB ≤ 512MiB | bounds checks dashboard |
| ✅ | quality_gate_idle_all_features | total_bytes_received | 10/10 | 1.12MiB ≤ 1.25MiB | bounds checks dashboard |
| ✅ | quality_gate_logs | intake_connections | 10/10 | 3 ≤ 6 | bounds checks dashboard |
| ✅ | quality_gate_logs | memory_usage | 10/10 | 187.24MiB ≤ 195MiB | bounds checks dashboard |
| ✅ | quality_gate_logs | missed_bytes | 10/10 | 0B = 0B | bounds checks dashboard |
| ✅ | quality_gate_logs | total_bytes_received | 10/10 | 264.08MiB ≤ 292MiB | bounds checks dashboard |
| ✅ | quality_gate_metrics_logs | cpu_usage | 10/10 | 436.52 ≤ 2000 | bounds checks dashboard |
| ✅ | quality_gate_metrics_logs | intake_connections | 10/10 | 3 ≤ 6 | bounds checks dashboard |
| ✅ | quality_gate_metrics_logs | memory_usage | 10/10 | 400.39MiB ≤ 430MiB | bounds checks dashboard |
| ✅ | quality_gate_metrics_logs | missed_bytes | 10/10 | 0B = 0B | bounds checks dashboard |
| ✅ | quality_gate_metrics_logs | total_bytes_received | 10/10 | 0.93GiB ≤ 1.04GiB | bounds checks dashboard |
| ✅ | quality_gate_private_action_runner | memory_usage | 10/10 | 71.38MiB ≤ 75MiB | bounds checks dashboard |
| ✅ | quality_gate_security_idle | cpu_usage | 10/10 | 31.65 ≤ 100 | bounds checks dashboard |
| ✅ | quality_gate_security_idle | memory_usage | 10/10 | 302.25MiB ≤ 330MiB | bounds checks dashboard |
| ✅ | quality_gate_security_mean_fs_load | cpu_usage | 10/10 | 60.64 ≤ 200 | bounds checks dashboard |
| ✅ | quality_gate_security_mean_fs_load | memory_usage | 10/10 | 281.53MiB ≤ 310MiB | bounds checks dashboard |
| ✅ | quality_gate_security_no_fs_load | cpu_usage | 10/10 | 22.01 ≤ 100 | bounds checks dashboard |
| ✅ | quality_gate_security_no_fs_load | memory_usage | 10/10 | 287.62MiB ≤ 320MiB | bounds checks dashboard |
Explanation
Confidence level: 90.00%
Effect size tolerance: |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%
Performance changes are noted in the perf column of each table:
- ✅ = significantly better comparison variant performance
- ❌ = significantly worse comparison variant performance
- ➖ = no significant change in performance
A regression test is an A/B test of target performance in a repeatable rig, where "performance" is measured as "comparison variant minus baseline variant" for an optimization goal (e.g., ingress throughput). Due to intrinsic variability in measuring that goal, we can only estimate its mean value for each experiment; we report uncertainty in that value as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI".
For each experiment, we decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if all of the following criteria are true:
-
Its estimated |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%, indicating the change is big enough to merit a closer look.
-
Its 90.00% confidence interval "Δ mean % CI" does not contain zero, indicating that if our statistical model is accurate, there is at least a 90.00% chance there is a difference in performance between baseline and comparison variants.
-
Its configuration does not mark it "erratic".
Replicate Execution Details
We run multiple replicates for each experiment/variant. However, we allow replicates to be automatically retried if there are any failures, up to 8 times, at which point the replicate is marked dead and we are unable to run analysis for the entire experiment. We call each of these attempts at running replicates a replicate execution. This section lists all replicate executions that failed due to the target crashing or being oom killed.
Note: In the below tables we bucket failures by experiment, variant, and failure type. For each of these buckets we list out the replicate indexes that failed with an annotation signifying how many times said replicate failed with the given failure mode. In the below example the baseline variant of the experiment named experiment_with_failures had two replicates that failed by oom kills. Replicate 0, which failed 8 executions, and replicate 1 which failed 6 executions, all with the same failure mode.
| Experiment | Variant | Replicates | Failure | Logs | Debug Dashboard |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| experiment_with_failures | baseline | 0 (x8) 1 (x6) | Oom killed | Debug Dashboard |
The debug dashboard links will take you to a debugging dashboard specifically designed to investigate replicate execution failures.
❌ Retried Profiling Replicate Execution Failures (ddprof)
Note: Profiling replicas may still be executing. See the debug dashboard for up to date status.
| Experiment | Variant | Replicates | Failure | Debug Dashboard |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| quality_gate_idle_all_features | baseline | 10 | Oom killed | Debug Dashboard |
| quality_gate_idle_all_features | comparison | 10 | Oom killed | Debug Dashboard |
| quality_gate_logs | baseline | 10 | Oom killed | Debug Dashboard |
| quality_gate_logs | comparison | 10 | Oom killed | Debug Dashboard |
| quality_gate_metrics_logs | baseline | 10 | Oom killed | Debug Dashboard |
| quality_gate_metrics_logs | comparison | 10 | Oom killed | Debug Dashboard |
| quality_gate_security_idle | comparison | 10 | Oom killed | Debug Dashboard |
| quality_gate_security_no_fs_load | baseline | 10 | Crashed (exit code: 134) | Debug Dashboard |
| quality_gate_security_no_fs_load | comparison | 10 | Crashed (exit code: 134) | Debug Dashboard |
CI Pass/Fail Decision
✅ Passed. All Quality Gates passed.
- quality_gate_logs, bounds check total_bytes_received: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_logs, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_logs, bounds check missed_bytes: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_logs, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_security_idle, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_security_idle, bounds check cpu_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check total_bytes_received: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check missed_bytes: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check cpu_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check total_bytes_received: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_private_action_runner, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_idle, bounds check total_bytes_received: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_idle, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_idle, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_security_no_fs_load, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_security_no_fs_load, bounds check cpu_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_security_mean_fs_load, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_security_mean_fs_load, bounds check cpu_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
What does this PR do?
Fixes two non-hermetic tests that leak ambient environment variables from the CI runner into their assertions:
cmd/serverless-init/mode:TestJavaTracerIsAutoInstrumenteddidn't resetJAVA_TOOL_OPTIONSbefore running.cmd/otel-agent/config: severalConfigTestSuiteproxy tests didn't resetHTTP_PROXY/HTTPS_PROXY/NO_PROXY(and theirDD_PROXY_*/lowercase equivalents) before running.Motivation
Both tests reliably fail on runners where these variables are pre-populated (e.g. with proxy settings), unrelated to any code change. Found while investigating unrelated CI failures on another PR:
Describe how you validated your changes
Additional Notes
Split out of #53847