[e2e][flake] Prevent Windows flare archive collisions

[pducolin]

What does this PR do?

• Adds a process-local atomic counter suffix to flare archive filenames.
• Includes the process ID with the counter to keep the suffix readable and avoid same-second collisions with another local process.
• Keeps the existing timestamp and log-level filename context.
• Adds a deterministic regression test that verifies repeated archive names generated for the same timestamp do not collide.

Motivation

Windows fails os.Rename when the destination archive already exists. TestAgentTaskFlareSourceAndTags creates several flare archives inside the same test process, with second-precision filenames. Once every ~2k runs, subtests created flares exactly at the same second in time, colliding on the file name.

A process-local atomic counter directly addresses those rapid same-process creations.

Jira: FLREM-150

Describe how you validated your changes

• Test passes on the CI
  Will keep monitoring for further failures.

Additional Notes

None.

---

PR with help of Bits - View session in Datadog

[datadog-official]

View session in Datadog

Bits Code status: ✅ Done

Comment @DataDog to request changes

[datadog-datadog-prod-us1]

I can only run on private repositories.

[pducolin]

/dd-review

[github-actions]

AI review by Codex (OpenAI) - workflow run

patch is correct — the atomic process-local suffix prevents same-second flare archive collisions, and the added test covers repeated generation for a fixed timestamp.

[datadog-official]

🎯 Code Coverage (details)
• Patch Coverage: 100.00%
• Overall Coverage: 52.37% (+0.02%)

_{This comment will be updated automatically if new data arrives.
🔗 Commit SHA: f8d219f | Docs | Datadog PR Page | Give us feedback!}

[dd-octo-sts]

Files inventory check summary

File checks results against ancestor 56a2203e:

Results for datadog-agent_7.84.0~devel.git.178.f8d219f.pipeline.131043099-1_amd64.deb:

No change detected

Results for datadog-iot-agent_7.84.0~devel.git.178.f8d219f.pipeline.131043099-1_amd64.deb:

No change detected

[dd-octo-sts]

Static quality checks

✅ Please find below the results from static quality gates
Comparison made with ancestor 56a2203
📊 Static Quality Gates Dashboard
🔗 SQG Job

Successful checks

Info

	Quality gate	Change	Size (prev → curr → max)
✅	agent_deb_amd64	+4.0 KiB (0.00% increase, -0.09% of buffer)	760.081 → 760.085 → 764.500
✅	agent_deb_amd64_fips	+4.0 KiB (0.00% increase, -0.14% of buffer)	712.942 → 712.946 → 715.740
✅	agent_heroku_amd64	+4.0 KiB (0.00% increase, -0.06% of buffer)	312.420 → 312.424 → 319.050
✅	agent_rpm_amd64	+4.0 KiB (0.00% increase, -0.09% of buffer)	760.065 → 760.069 → 764.470
✅	agent_rpm_amd64_fips	+4.0 KiB (0.00% increase, -0.14% of buffer)	712.926 → 712.929 → 715.740
✅	agent_rpm_arm64_fips	+4.0 KiB (0.00% increase, -0.25% of buffer)	692.151 → 692.155 → 693.690
✅	agent_suse_amd64	+4.0 KiB (0.00% increase, -0.09% of buffer)	760.065 → 760.069 → 764.470
✅	agent_suse_amd64_fips	+4.0 KiB (0.00% increase, -0.14% of buffer)	712.926 → 712.929 → 715.740
✅	agent_suse_arm64_fips	+4.0 KiB (0.00% increase, -0.25% of buffer)	692.151 → 692.155 → 693.690
✅	docker_agent_amd64	+4.0 KiB (0.00% increase, -0.29% of buffer)	818.697 → 818.701 → 820.040
✅	docker_agent_jmx_amd64	+4.0 KiB (0.00% increase, -0.32% of buffer)	1009.594 → 1009.598 → 1010.800
✅	iot_agent_deb_amd64	+4.0 KiB (0.01% increase, -0.37% of buffer)	46.467 → 46.471 → 47.530
✅	iot_agent_deb_arm64	+4.0 KiB (0.01% increase, -0.36% of buffer)	43.120 → 43.124 → 44.200
✅	iot_agent_rpm_amd64	+4.0 KiB (0.01% increase, -0.37% of buffer)	46.468 → 46.472 → 47.530
✅	iot_agent_suse_amd64	+4.0 KiB (0.01% increase, -0.37% of buffer)	46.467 → 46.471 → 47.530

17 successful checks with minimal change (< 2 KiB)

	Quality gate	Current Size
✅	agent_rpm_arm64	735.964 MiB
✅	agent_suse_arm64	735.964 MiB
✅	docker_agent_arm64	819.640 MiB
✅	docker_agent_jmx_arm64	999.190 MiB
✅	docker_cluster_agent_amd64	210.475 MiB
✅	docker_cluster_agent_arm64	223.456 MiB
✅	docker_cws_instrumentation_amd64	7.439 MiB
✅	docker_cws_instrumentation_arm64	6.877 MiB
✅	docker_dogstatsd_amd64	39.482 MiB
✅	docker_dogstatsd_arm64	37.560 MiB
✅	docker_host_profiler_amd64	305.814 MiB
✅	docker_host_profiler_arm64	317.124 MiB
✅	dogstatsd_deb_amd64	30.224 MiB
✅	dogstatsd_deb_arm64	28.247 MiB
✅	dogstatsd_rpm_amd64	30.224 MiB
✅	dogstatsd_suse_amd64	30.224 MiB
✅	iot_agent_deb_armhf	43.907 MiB

[cit-pr-commenter-54b7da]

Regression Detector

Regression Detector Results

Metrics dashboard
Target profiles
Job ID: a9048467-b286-4169-bb7c-ae0710fd4d74

Baseline: 7ba1833
Comparison: bcbf486
Diff

Optimization Goals: ✅ No significant changes detected

Fine details of change detection per experiment

perf	experiment	goal	Δ mean %	Δ mean % CI	trials	links
➖	quality_gate_metrics_logs	memory utilization	+1.50	[+1.25, +1.76]	1	Logs bounds checks dashboard
➖	quality_gate_logs	% cpu utilization	+1.21	[+0.34, +2.09]	1	Logs bounds checks dashboard
➖	quality_gate_security_mean_fs_load	memory utilization	+0.32	[+0.25, +0.40]	1	Logs bounds checks dashboard
➖	quality_gate_security_idle	memory utilization	+0.31	[+0.20, +0.42]	1	Logs bounds checks dashboard
➖	quality_gate_security_no_fs_load	memory utilization	+0.04	[-0.11, +0.18]	1	Logs bounds checks dashboard
➖	quality_gate_idle_all_features	memory utilization	+0.01	[-0.03, +0.05]	1	Logs bounds checks dashboard
➖	quality_gate_idle	memory utilization	-0.31	[-0.43, -0.19]	1	Logs bounds checks dashboard
➖	quality_gate_private_action_runner	memory utilization	-0.76	[-0.88, -0.64]	1	Logs bounds checks dashboard

Bounds Checks: ✅ Passed

perf	experiment	bounds_check_name	replicates_passed	observed_value	links
✅	quality_gate_idle	intake_connections	10/10	4 = 4	bounds checks dashboard
✅	quality_gate_idle	memory_usage	10/10	174.48MiB ≤ 178MiB	bounds checks dashboard
✅	quality_gate_idle	total_bytes_received	10/10	739.04KiB ≤ 819.20KiB	bounds checks dashboard
✅	quality_gate_idle_all_features	intake_connections	10/10	4 = 4	bounds checks dashboard
✅	quality_gate_idle_all_features	memory_usage	10/10	512.41MiB ≤ 538MiB	bounds checks dashboard
✅	quality_gate_idle_all_features	total_bytes_received	10/10	1.12MiB ≤ 1.25MiB	bounds checks dashboard
✅	quality_gate_logs	intake_connections	10/10	16 ≤ 40	bounds checks dashboard
✅	quality_gate_logs	memory_usage	10/10	206.41MiB ≤ 229MiB	bounds checks dashboard
✅	quality_gate_logs	missed_bytes	10/10	0B = 0B	bounds checks dashboard
✅	quality_gate_logs	total_bytes_received	10/10	264.20MiB ≤ 292MiB	bounds checks dashboard
✅	quality_gate_metrics_logs	cpu_usage	10/10	364.41 ≤ 2000	bounds checks dashboard
✅	quality_gate_metrics_logs	intake_connections	10/10	19 ≤ 40	bounds checks dashboard
✅	quality_gate_metrics_logs	memory_usage	10/10	398.79MiB ≤ 439MiB	bounds checks dashboard
✅	quality_gate_metrics_logs	missed_bytes	10/10	0B = 0B	bounds checks dashboard
✅	quality_gate_metrics_logs	total_bytes_received	10/10	0.94GiB ≤ 1.04GiB	bounds checks dashboard
✅	quality_gate_private_action_runner	memory_usage	10/10	72.57MiB ≤ 76MiB	bounds checks dashboard
✅	quality_gate_security_idle	cpu_usage	10/10	25.60 ≤ 100	bounds checks dashboard
✅	quality_gate_security_idle	memory_usage	10/10	325.16MiB ≤ 335MiB	bounds checks dashboard
✅	quality_gate_security_mean_fs_load	cpu_usage	10/10	59.52 ≤ 200	bounds checks dashboard
✅	quality_gate_security_mean_fs_load	memory_usage	10/10	302.85MiB ≤ 314MiB	bounds checks dashboard
✅	quality_gate_security_no_fs_load	cpu_usage	10/10	20.88 ≤ 100	bounds checks dashboard
✅	quality_gate_security_no_fs_load	memory_usage	10/10	310.78MiB ≤ 343MiB	bounds checks dashboard

Explanation

Confidence level: 90.00%
Effect size tolerance: |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%

Performance changes are noted in the perf column of each table:

• ✅ = significantly better comparison variant performance
• ❌ = significantly worse comparison variant performance
• ➖ = no significant change in performance

A regression test is an A/B test of target performance in a repeatable rig, where "performance" is measured as "comparison variant minus baseline variant" for an optimization goal (e.g., ingress throughput). Due to intrinsic variability in measuring that goal, we can only estimate its mean value for each experiment; we report uncertainty in that value as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI".

For each experiment, we decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if all of the following criteria are true:

1. Its estimated |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%, indicating the change is big enough to merit a closer look.

2. Its 90.00% confidence interval "Δ mean % CI" does not contain zero, indicating that if our statistical model is accurate, there is at least a 90.00% chance there is a difference in performance between baseline and comparison variants.

3. Its configuration does not mark it "erratic".

CI Pass/Fail Decision

✅ Passed. All Quality Gates passed.

• quality_gate_private_action_runner, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
• quality_gate_security_no_fs_load, bounds check cpu_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
• quality_gate_security_no_fs_load, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
• quality_gate_security_idle, bounds check cpu_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
• quality_gate_security_idle, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
• quality_gate_idle, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
• quality_gate_idle, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
• quality_gate_idle, bounds check total_bytes_received: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
• quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check total_bytes_received: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
• quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
• quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
• quality_gate_logs, bounds check total_bytes_received: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
• quality_gate_logs, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
• quality_gate_logs, bounds check missed_bytes: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
• quality_gate_logs, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
• quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check missed_bytes: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
• quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check total_bytes_received: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
• quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check cpu_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
• quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
• quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
• quality_gate_security_mean_fs_load, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
• quality_gate_security_mean_fs_load, bounds check cpu_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.

[pducolin]

/merge

[gh-worker-devflow-routing-ef8351]

View all feedbacks in Devflow UI.

2026-08-17 08:44:15 UTC ℹ️ Start processing command /merge

---

2026-08-17 08:44:19 UTC ℹ️ MergeQueue: pull request added to the queue

The expected merge time in main is approximately 3h (p90).

---

2026-08-17 09:25:11 UTC ℹ️ MergeQueue: This merge request was merged