Skip to content

[Profiler] Generate reference chain#8225

Open
chrisnas wants to merge 19 commits intomasterfrom
chrisnas/reference_chain
Open

[Profiler] Generate reference chain#8225
chrisnas wants to merge 19 commits intomasterfrom
chrisnas/reference_chain

Conversation

@chrisnas
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary of changes

Generate reference chain at type level

Reason for change

Last step to help pointing out memory leaks root cause (i.e. which root is responsible for keeping instances alive)

Implementation details

Listen to GC_BULK_ROOT_STATIC_VAR and GC_BULK_ROOT_EDGE to get the different kinds of root. Next, traverse the reference fields down to a leak (i.e. non reference object). The reference chain is kept at the type level to avoid consumming to much memory and serialized in .json format to be sent with profile data.

Test coverage

Unit tests and integration tests have been added.

Other details

@chrisnas chrisnas requested a review from a team as a code owner February 20, 2026 10:55
@github-actions github-actions bot added the area:profiler Issues related to the continous-profiler label Feb 20, 2026
@dd-trace-dotnet-ci-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

dd-trace-dotnet-ci-bot bot commented Feb 20, 2026

Execution-Time Benchmarks Report ⏱️

Execution-time results for samples comparing This PR (8225) and master.

⚠️ Potential regressions detected

HttpMessageHandler

Metric Master (Mean ± 95% CI) Current (Mean ± 95% CI) Change Status
.NET Framework 4.8 - Baseline
duration189.70 ± (189.65 - 190.27) ms206.90 ± (206.77 - 207.72) ms+9.1%❌⬆️
.NET Framework 4.8 - Bailout
duration193.34 ± (193.23 - 193.63) ms210.82 ± (210.58 - 211.34) ms+9.0%❌⬆️
.NET Framework 4.8 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
duration1139.41 ± (1139.56 - 1146.95) ms1208.59 ± (1207.31 - 1213.22) ms+6.1%❌⬆️
Full Metrics Comparison

FakeDbCommand

Metric Master (Mean ± 95% CI) Current (Mean ± 95% CI) Change Status
.NET Framework 4.8 - Baseline
duration71.47 ± (71.49 - 71.85) ms72.07 ± (72.17 - 72.54) ms+0.8%✅⬆️
.NET Framework 4.8 - Bailout
duration75.52 ± (75.52 - 75.83) ms75.60 ± (75.56 - 75.88) ms+0.1%✅⬆️
.NET Framework 4.8 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
duration1059.28 ± (1061.24 - 1066.75) ms1061.18 ± (1062.33 - 1067.86) ms+0.2%✅⬆️
.NET Core 3.1 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms22.47 ± (22.43 - 22.50) ms22.31 ± (22.28 - 22.34) ms-0.7%
process.time_to_main_ms83.44 ± (83.23 - 83.65) ms83.35 ± (83.16 - 83.54) ms-0.1%
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed10.90 ± (10.90 - 10.91) MB10.90 ± (10.90 - 10.91) MB+0.0%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count12 ± (12 - 12)12 ± (12 - 12)+0.0%
.NET Core 3.1 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms22.45 ± (22.41 - 22.49) ms22.34 ± (22.30 - 22.37) ms-0.5%
process.time_to_main_ms85.06 ± (84.84 - 85.27) ms85.38 ± (85.17 - 85.60) ms+0.4%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed10.87 ± (10.87 - 10.88) MB10.94 ± (10.93 - 10.94) MB+0.6%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count13 ± (13 - 13)13 ± (13 - 13)+0.0%
.NET Core 3.1 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms224.72 ± (223.60 - 225.85) ms224.90 ± (223.80 - 226.00) ms+0.1%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms518.20 ± (517.14 - 519.25) ms515.42 ± (514.32 - 516.52) ms-0.5%
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed47.77 ± (47.74 - 47.80) MB47.77 ± (47.73 - 47.81) MB-0.0%
runtime.dotnet.threads.count28 ± (28 - 28)28 ± (28 - 28)+0.3%✅⬆️
.NET 6 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms21.08 ± (21.05 - 21.12) ms21.08 ± (21.05 - 21.11) ms-0.0%
process.time_to_main_ms72.62 ± (72.46 - 72.78) ms72.78 ± (72.61 - 72.96) ms+0.2%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed10.60 ± (10.60 - 10.61) MB10.62 ± (10.62 - 10.62) MB+0.2%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count10 ± (10 - 10)10 ± (10 - 10)+0.0%
.NET 6 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms20.90 ± (20.86 - 20.93) ms20.87 ± (20.83 - 20.91) ms-0.1%
process.time_to_main_ms73.09 ± (72.92 - 73.25) ms73.17 ± (72.99 - 73.34) ms+0.1%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed10.72 ± (10.71 - 10.72) MB10.73 ± (10.73 - 10.73) MB+0.1%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count11 ± (11 - 11)11 ± (11 - 11)+0.0%
.NET 6 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms388.37 ± (386.55 - 390.19) ms385.19 ± (383.20 - 387.18) ms-0.8%
process.time_to_main_ms516.60 ± (515.62 - 517.58) ms517.29 ± (516.41 - 518.18) ms+0.1%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed49.89 ± (49.87 - 49.92) MB49.99 ± (49.96 - 50.01) MB+0.2%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count28 ± (28 - 28)28 ± (28 - 28)-0.1%
.NET 8 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms19.16 ± (19.12 - 19.19) ms19.22 ± (19.18 - 19.25) ms+0.3%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms71.47 ± (71.30 - 71.64) ms71.39 ± (71.23 - 71.56) ms-0.1%
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed7.67 ± (7.66 - 7.67) MB7.67 ± (7.66 - 7.68) MB+0.1%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count10 ± (10 - 10)10 ± (10 - 10)+0.0%
.NET 8 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms19.18 ± (19.15 - 19.22) ms19.22 ± (19.18 - 19.26) ms+0.2%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms72.54 ± (72.37 - 72.71) ms72.11 ± (72.00 - 72.21) ms-0.6%
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed7.72 ± (7.71 - 7.72) MB7.72 ± (7.71 - 7.72) MB+0.0%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count11 ± (11 - 11)11 ± (11 - 11)+0.0%
.NET 8 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms306.20 ± (304.03 - 308.38) ms302.91 ± (300.74 - 305.08) ms-1.1%
process.time_to_main_ms478.08 ± (477.34 - 478.82) ms479.87 ± (479.20 - 480.53) ms+0.4%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed36.98 ± (36.96 - 37.00) MB36.90 ± (36.87 - 36.93) MB-0.2%
runtime.dotnet.threads.count27 ± (27 - 27)27 ± (27 - 27)+0.1%✅⬆️

HttpMessageHandler

Metric Master (Mean ± 95% CI) Current (Mean ± 95% CI) Change Status
.NET Framework 4.8 - Baseline
duration189.70 ± (189.65 - 190.27) ms206.90 ± (206.77 - 207.72) ms+9.1%❌⬆️
.NET Framework 4.8 - Bailout
duration193.34 ± (193.23 - 193.63) ms210.82 ± (210.58 - 211.34) ms+9.0%❌⬆️
.NET Framework 4.8 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
duration1139.41 ± (1139.56 - 1146.95) ms1208.59 ± (1207.31 - 1213.22) ms+6.1%❌⬆️
.NET Core 3.1 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms185.24 ± (185.01 - 185.47) ms204.73 ± (204.26 - 205.20) ms+10.5%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms79.23 ± (79.06 - 79.40) ms88.64 ± (88.39 - 88.89) ms+11.9%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count3 ± (3 - 3)3 ± (3 - 3)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed16.13 ± (16.10 - 16.15) MB15.96 ± (15.95 - 15.98) MB-1.0%
runtime.dotnet.threads.count20 ± (19 - 20)20 ± (20 - 20)+1.1%✅⬆️
.NET Core 3.1 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms184.33 ± (184.18 - 184.47) ms203.28 ± (202.79 - 203.77) ms+10.3%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms80.45 ± (80.35 - 80.54) ms89.13 ± (88.88 - 89.38) ms+10.8%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count3 ± (3 - 3)3 ± (3 - 3)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed15.80 ± (15.66 - 15.93) MB16.00 ± (15.98 - 16.02) MB+1.3%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count20 ± (20 - 20)21 ± (21 - 21)+5.0%✅⬆️
.NET Core 3.1 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms388.94 ± (387.40 - 390.49) ms414.73 ± (413.47 - 415.99) ms+6.6%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms499.49 ± (498.34 - 500.64) ms544.46 ± (543.23 - 545.68) ms+9.0%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count3 ± (3 - 3)3 ± (3 - 3)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed57.45 ± (57.24 - 57.67) MB58.70 ± (58.66 - 58.75) MB+2.2%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count30 ± (29 - 30)30 ± (30 - 30)+1.7%✅⬆️
.NET 6 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms189.37 ± (189.12 - 189.62) ms208.01 ± (207.59 - 208.43) ms+9.8%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms69.01 ± (68.89 - 69.14) ms76.35 ± (76.09 - 76.61) ms+10.6%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed16.18 ± (16.02 - 16.33) MB16.26 ± (16.23 - 16.29) MB+0.5%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count18 ± (18 - 18)20 ± (19 - 20)+8.1%✅⬆️
.NET 6 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms188.39 ± (188.24 - 188.55) ms207.26 ± (206.76 - 207.77) ms+10.0%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms69.80 ± (69.76 - 69.85) ms77.73 ± (77.49 - 77.98) ms+11.4%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed15.79 ± (15.62 - 15.96) MB16.26 ± (16.24 - 16.29) MB+3.0%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count19 ± (18 - 19)21 ± (20 - 21)+10.8%✅⬆️
.NET 6 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms598.97 ± (596.47 - 601.48) ms597.57 ± (594.70 - 600.45) ms-0.2%
process.time_to_main_ms503.12 ± (502.25 - 503.98) ms543.60 ± (542.04 - 545.16) ms+8.0%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed61.56 ± (61.46 - 61.66) MB61.60 ± (61.48 - 61.72) MB+0.1%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count30 ± (30 - 30)31 ± (31 - 31)+1.2%✅⬆️
.NET 8 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms187.70 ± (187.47 - 187.93) ms205.21 ± (204.81 - 205.61) ms+9.3%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms68.47 ± (68.33 - 68.61) ms75.87 ± (75.59 - 76.15) ms+10.8%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed11.58 ± (11.47 - 11.69) MB11.65 ± (11.63 - 11.67) MB+0.6%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count17 ± (17 - 18)19 ± (19 - 19)+8.6%✅⬆️
.NET 8 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms186.78 ± (186.58 - 186.97) ms204.97 ± (204.51 - 205.43) ms+9.7%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms69.38 ± (69.33 - 69.44) ms77.16 ± (76.95 - 77.37) ms+11.2%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed11.76 ± (11.69 - 11.84) MB11.68 ± (11.66 - 11.69) MB-0.7%
runtime.dotnet.threads.count19 ± (18 - 19)20 ± (20 - 20)+7.2%✅⬆️
.NET 8 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms519.29 ± (516.15 - 522.43) ms524.81 ± (520.00 - 529.63) ms+1.1%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms462.40 ± (461.78 - 463.01) ms503.12 ± (502.10 - 504.14) ms+8.8%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed50.71 ± (50.68 - 50.74) MB50.69 ± (50.63 - 50.76) MB-0.0%
runtime.dotnet.threads.count30 ± (30 - 30)30 ± (30 - 30)+0.9%✅⬆️
Comparison explanation

Execution-time benchmarks measure the whole time it takes to execute a program, and are intended to measure the one-off costs. Cases where the execution time results for the PR are worse than latest master results are highlighted in **red**. The following thresholds were used for comparing the execution times:

  • Welch test with statistical test for significance of 5%
  • Only results indicating a difference greater than 5% and 5 ms are considered.

Note that these results are based on a single point-in-time result for each branch. For full results, see the dashboard.

Graphs show the p99 interval based on the mean and StdDev of the test run, as well as the mean value of the run (shown as a diamond below the graph).

Duration charts
FakeDbCommand (.NET Framework 4.8)
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET Framework 4.8)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8225) - mean (72ms)  : 70, 75
    master - mean (72ms)  : 69, 74

    section Bailout
    This PR (8225) - mean (76ms)  : 74, 77
    master - mean (76ms)  : 74, 77

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8225) - mean (1,065ms)  : 1025, 1105
    master - mean (1,064ms)  : 1025, 1103

Loading
FakeDbCommand (.NET Core 3.1)
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET Core 3.1)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8225) - mean (113ms)  : 108, 117
    master - mean (113ms)  : 109, 116

    section Bailout
    This PR (8225) - mean (114ms)  : 111, 117
    master - mean (114ms)  : 111, 117

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8225) - mean (777ms)  : 758, 796
    master - mean (779ms)  : 756, 801

Loading
FakeDbCommand (.NET 6)
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET 6)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8225) - mean (100ms)  : 97, 103
    master - mean (100ms)  : 97, 103

    section Bailout
    This PR (8225) - mean (100ms)  : 98, 103
    master - mean (100ms)  : 97, 103

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8225) - mean (930ms)  : 897, 964
    master - mean (933ms)  : 896, 971

Loading
FakeDbCommand (.NET 8)
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET 8)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8225) - mean (98ms)  : 95, 101
    master - mean (98ms)  : 95, 101

    section Bailout
    This PR (8225) - mean (99ms)  : 97, 100
    master - mean (99ms)  : 97, 102

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8225) - mean (812ms)  : 780, 844
    master - mean (815ms)  : 777, 852

Loading
HttpMessageHandler (.NET Framework 4.8)
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET Framework 4.8)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8225) - mean (207ms)  : 202, 213
    master - mean (190ms)  : 187, 193

    section Bailout
    This PR (8225) - mean (211ms)  : crit, 207, 215
    master - mean (193ms)  : 192, 195

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8225) - mean (1,210ms)  : crit, 1167, 1254
    master - mean (1,143ms)  : 1090, 1197

Loading
HttpMessageHandler (.NET Core 3.1)
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET Core 3.1)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8225) - mean (303ms)  : 295, 310
    master - mean (272ms)  : 268, 276

    section Bailout
    This PR (8225) - mean (301ms)  : crit, 295, 308
    master - mean (273ms)  : 270, 275

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8225) - mean (997ms)  : crit, 970, 1024
    master - mean (919ms)  : 899, 939

Loading
HttpMessageHandler (.NET 6)
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET 6)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8225) - mean (293ms)  : 287, 300
    master - mean (266ms)  : 263, 270

    section Bailout
    This PR (8225) - mean (294ms)  : crit, 287, 301
    master - mean (266ms)  : 264, 268

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8225) - mean (1,173ms)  : 1139, 1206
    master - mean (1,134ms)  : 1097, 1170

Loading
HttpMessageHandler (.NET 8)
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET 8)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8225) - mean (292ms)  : 285, 299
    master - mean (266ms)  : 262, 269

    section Bailout
    This PR (8225) - mean (293ms)  : crit, 285, 300
    master - mean (265ms)  : 263, 267

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8225) - mean (1,062ms)  : 989, 1136
    master - mean (1,009ms)  : 944, 1074

Loading

@pr-commenter
Copy link
Copy Markdown

pr-commenter bot commented Feb 20, 2026

Benchmarks

Benchmark execution time: 2026-04-03 13:47:26

Comparing candidate commit 0230f16 in PR branch chrisnas/reference_chain with baseline commit 0932573 in branch master.

Found 7 performance improvements and 10 performance regressions! Performance is the same for 262 metrics, 9 unstable metrics.

Explanation

This is an A/B test comparing a candidate commit's performance against that of a baseline commit. Performance changes are noted in the tables below as:

  • 🟩 = significantly better candidate vs. baseline
  • 🟥 = significantly worse candidate vs. baseline

We compute a confidence interval (CI) over the relative difference of means between metrics from the candidate and baseline commits, considering the baseline as the reference.

If the CI is entirely outside the configured SIGNIFICANT_IMPACT_THRESHOLD (or the deprecated UNCONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD), the change is considered significant.

Feel free to reach out to #apm-benchmarking-platform on Slack if you have any questions.

More details about the CI and significant changes

You can imagine this CI as a range of values that is likely to contain the true difference of means between the candidate and baseline commits.

CIs of the difference of means are often centered around 0%, because often changes are not that big:

---------------------------------(------|---^--------)-------------------------------->
                              -0.6%    0%  0.3%     +1.2%
                                 |          |        |
         lower bound of the CI --'          |        |
sample mean (center of the CI) -------------'        |
         upper bound of the CI ----------------------'

As described above, a change is considered significant if the CI is entirely outside the configured SIGNIFICANT_IMPACT_THRESHOLD (or the deprecated UNCONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD).

For instance, for an execution time metric, this confidence interval indicates a significantly worse performance:

----------------------------------------|---------|---(---------^---------)---------->
                                       0%        1%  1.3%      2.2%      3.1%
                                                  |   |         |         |
       significant impact threshold --------------'   |         |         |
                      lower bound of CI --------------'         |         |
       sample mean (center of the CI) --------------------------'         |
                      upper bound of CI ----------------------------------'

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeLegacyArgs netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 execution_time [-23.897ms; -23.315ms] or [-11.744%; -11.458%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 execution_time [-52.599ms; -48.038ms] or [-25.764%; -23.530%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSlice net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+106.958µs; +112.215µs] or [+5.636%; +5.913%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-29.455op/s; -28.079op/s] or [-5.590%; -5.329%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSlice net6.0

  • 🟩 execution_time [-181.044µs; -178.142µs] or [-11.707%; -11.519%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+84.257op/s; +85.652op/s] or [+13.031%; +13.246%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatAspectBenchmark net6.0

  • 🟥 throughput [-322.448op/s; -124.152op/s] or [-14.898%; -5.736%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatAspectBenchmark netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 throughput [+188.505op/s; +364.466op/s] or [+10.582%; +20.460%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatBenchmark net6.0

  • 🟥 throughput [-3626.328op/s; -1367.628op/s] or [-15.223%; -5.741%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Log4netBenchmark.EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+21.948ms; +25.535ms] or [+12.336%; +14.353%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.RedisBenchmark.SendReceive netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+15.233ms; +20.552ms] or [+7.983%; +10.771%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SingleSpanAspNetCoreBenchmark.SingleSpanAspNetCore net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+105.535ms; +107.610ms] or [+114.869%; +117.127%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SingleSpanAspNetCoreBenchmark.SingleSpanAspNetCore netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 throughput [+14717663.103op/s; +15923767.442op/s] or [+6.529%; +7.064%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishScope net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+13.834ms; +17.628ms] or [+6.932%; +8.834%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishSpan net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+16.338ms; +20.205ms] or [+8.164%; +10.097%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishSpan netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 execution_time [-15.270ms; -13.738ms] or [-7.118%; -6.404%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishTwoScopes netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+16.051ms; +20.132ms] or [+8.213%; +10.302%]

@chrisnas chrisnas requested a review from a team as a code owner March 3, 2026 11:41
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

area:profiler Issues related to the continous-profiler

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant