Port ServiceStackRedis to Testcontainers by bouwkast · Pull Request #8430 · DataDog/dd-trace-dotnet

bouwkast · 2026-04-08T21:15:33Z

Summary of changes

This attempts to port the ServiceStack.Redis integration tests to use Testcontainers

Reason for change

Implementation details

Test coverage

Ran locally fine, will see with CI

Other details

I tried this with SqlServer first but it proved to be pretty challenging so trying this instead

dd-trace-dotnet-ci-bot · 2026-04-08T22:16:17Z

Execution-Time Benchmarks Report ⏱️

Execution-time results for samples comparing This PR (8430) and master.

✅ No regressions detected - check the details below

Full Metrics Comparison

FakeDbCommand

Metric	Master (Mean ± 95% CI)	Current (Mean ± 95% CI)	Change	Status
.NET Framework 4.8 - Baseline
duration	75.71 ± (76.45 - 77.76) ms	71.51 ± (71.55 - 71.94) ms	-5.6%	✅
.NET Framework 4.8 - Bailout
duration	80.64 ± (80.78 - 82.06) ms	75.83 ± (75.65 - 75.99) ms	-6.0%	✅
.NET Framework 4.8 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
duration	1162.14 ± (1153.33 - 1169.39) ms	1064.12 ± (1066.16 - 1072.46) ms	-8.4%	✅
.NET Core 3.1 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms	24.77 ± (24.68 - 24.87) ms	22.24 ± (22.21 - 22.27) ms	-10.2%	✅
process.time_to_main_ms	98.96 ± (98.64 - 99.28) ms	83.11 ± (82.92 - 83.30) ms	-16.0%	✅
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count	0 ± (0 - 0)	0 ± (0 - 0)	+0.0%	✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed	10.93 ± (10.93 - 10.94) MB	10.93 ± (10.92 - 10.93) MB	-0.1%	✅
runtime.dotnet.threads.count	12 ± (12 - 12)	12 ± (12 - 12)	+0.0%	✅
.NET Core 3.1 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms	23.97 ± (23.80 - 24.14) ms	22.17 ± (22.13 - 22.20) ms	-7.5%	✅
process.time_to_main_ms	100.23 ± (99.85 - 100.62) ms	84.23 ± (84.04 - 84.41) ms	-16.0%	✅
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count	0 ± (0 - 0)	0 ± (0 - 0)	+0.0%	✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed	10.96 ± (10.96 - 10.96) MB	10.97 ± (10.96 - 10.97) MB	+0.0%	✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count	13 ± (13 - 13)	13 ± (13 - 13)	+0.0%	✅
.NET Core 3.1 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms	232.32 ± (231.20 - 233.44) ms	225.26 ± (224.02 - 226.51) ms	-3.0%	✅
process.time_to_main_ms	538.23 ± (536.65 - 539.81) ms	518.77 ± (517.58 - 519.97) ms	-3.6%	✅
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count	0 ± (0 - 0)	0 ± (0 - 0)	+0.0%	✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed	48.35 ± (48.32 - 48.37) MB	48.43 ± (48.40 - 48.46) MB	+0.2%	✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count	28 ± (28 - 28)	28 ± (28 - 28)	-0.0%	✅
.NET 6 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms	21.49 ± (21.43 - 21.54) ms	20.95 ± (20.92 - 20.98) ms	-2.5%	✅
process.time_to_main_ms	75.12 ± (74.85 - 75.39) ms	71.50 ± (71.35 - 71.66) ms	-4.8%	✅
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count	0 ± (0 - 0)	0 ± (0 - 0)	+0.0%	✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed	10.62 ± (10.61 - 10.62) MB	10.65 ± (10.65 - 10.66) MB	+0.3%	✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count	10 ± (10 - 10)	10 ± (10 - 10)	+0.0%	✅
.NET 6 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms	21.38 ± (21.34 - 21.42) ms	20.95 ± (20.91 - 20.98) ms	-2.0%	✅
process.time_to_main_ms	76.10 ± (75.87 - 76.32) ms	72.98 ± (72.80 - 73.16) ms	-4.1%	✅
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count	0 ± (0 - 0)	0 ± (0 - 0)	+0.0%	✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed	10.72 ± (10.72 - 10.72) MB	10.77 ± (10.76 - 10.77) MB	+0.5%	✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count	11 ± (11 - 11)	11 ± (11 - 11)	+0.0%	✅
.NET 6 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms	382.55 ± (380.66 - 384.44) ms	383.80 ± (381.98 - 385.62) ms	+0.3%	✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms	530.63 ± (529.60 - 531.67) ms	520.10 ± (519.22 - 520.99) ms	-2.0%	✅
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count	0 ± (0 - 0)	0 ± (0 - 0)	+0.0%	✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed	49.93 ± (49.90 - 49.96) MB	50.03 ± (50.00 - 50.06) MB	+0.2%	✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count	28 ± (28 - 28)	28 ± (28 - 28)	-0.1%	✅
.NET 8 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms	19.74 ± (19.70 - 19.79) ms	19.24 ± (19.21 - 19.28) ms	-2.5%	✅
process.time_to_main_ms	73.92 ± (73.71 - 74.12) ms	71.35 ± (71.20 - 71.50) ms	-3.5%	✅
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count	0 ± (0 - 0)	0 ± (0 - 0)	+0.0%	✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed	7.68 ± (7.67 - 7.69) MB	7.70 ± (7.69 - 7.70) MB	+0.2%	✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count	10 ± (10 - 10)	10 ± (10 - 10)	+0.0%	✅
.NET 8 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms	19.56 ± (19.52 - 19.60) ms	19.17 ± (19.14 - 19.20) ms	-2.0%	✅
process.time_to_main_ms	74.36 ± (74.14 - 74.59) ms	72.07 ± (71.94 - 72.20) ms	-3.1%	✅
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count	0 ± (0 - 0)	0 ± (0 - 0)	+0.0%	✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed	7.76 ± (7.75 - 7.77) MB	7.74 ± (7.73 - 7.75) MB	-0.2%	✅
runtime.dotnet.threads.count	11 ± (11 - 11)	11 ± (11 - 11)	+0.0%	✅
.NET 8 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms	303.58 ± (301.23 - 305.93) ms	303.15 ± (300.86 - 305.45) ms	-0.1%	✅
process.time_to_main_ms	490.98 ± (489.93 - 492.03) ms	480.27 ± (479.51 - 481.02) ms	-2.2%	✅
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count	0 ± (0 - 0)	0 ± (0 - 0)	+0.0%	✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed	37.07 ± (37.05 - 37.10) MB	37.11 ± (37.08 - 37.13) MB	+0.1%	✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count	27 ± (27 - 27)	27 ± (27 - 27)	+0.7%	✅⬆️

HttpMessageHandler

Metric	Master (Mean ± 95% CI)	Current (Mean ± 95% CI)	Change	Status
.NET Framework 4.8 - Baseline
duration	194.28 ± (194.08 - 194.86) ms	194.73 ± (194.57 - 195.42) ms	+0.2%	✅⬆️
.NET Framework 4.8 - Bailout
duration	197.53 ± (197.39 - 198.05) ms	197.28 ± (197.23 - 197.84) ms	-0.1%	✅
.NET Framework 4.8 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
duration	1154.87 ± (1156.18 - 1162.45) ms	1152.01 ± (1153.95 - 1160.92) ms	-0.2%	✅
.NET Core 3.1 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms	189.07 ± (188.64 - 189.51) ms	190.00 ± (189.56 - 190.43) ms	+0.5%	✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms	81.68 ± (81.44 - 81.91) ms	82.23 ± (81.98 - 82.48) ms	+0.7%	✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count	3 ± (3 - 3)	3 ± (3 - 3)	+0.0%	✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed	16.11 ± (16.08 - 16.13) MB	16.12 ± (16.09 - 16.15) MB	+0.1%	✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count	20 ± (20 - 20)	20 ± (20 - 20)	+0.2%	✅⬆️
.NET Core 3.1 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms	189.08 ± (188.74 - 189.42) ms	189.83 ± (189.34 - 190.32) ms	+0.4%	✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms	83.07 ± (82.91 - 83.23) ms	83.44 ± (83.28 - 83.61) ms	+0.4%	✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count	3 ± (3 - 3)	3 ± (3 - 3)	+0.0%	✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed	16.13 ± (16.10 - 16.16) MB	16.17 ± (16.15 - 16.20) MB	+0.3%	✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count	21 ± (20 - 21)	21 ± (21 - 21)	+0.2%	✅⬆️
.NET Core 3.1 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms	398.91 ± (397.41 - 400.41) ms	396.15 ± (394.61 - 397.69) ms	-0.7%	✅
process.time_to_main_ms	514.97 ± (513.40 - 516.53) ms	514.78 ± (513.54 - 516.02) ms	-0.0%	✅
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count	3 ± (3 - 3)	3 ± (3 - 3)	+0.0%	✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed	59.24 ± (59.18 - 59.31) MB	58.94 ± (58.76 - 59.13) MB	-0.5%	✅
runtime.dotnet.threads.count	30 ± (30 - 30)	30 ± (30 - 30)	-0.1%	✅
.NET 6 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms	194.71 ± (194.28 - 195.15) ms	193.76 ± (193.37 - 194.15) ms	-0.5%	✅
process.time_to_main_ms	71.38 ± (71.19 - 71.57) ms	70.75 ± (70.57 - 70.92) ms	-0.9%	✅
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count	4 ± (4 - 4)	4 ± (4 - 4)	+0.0%	✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed	16.38 ± (16.35 - 16.41) MB	16.42 ± (16.38 - 16.45) MB	+0.2%	✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count	19 ± (19 - 19)	19 ± (19 - 19)	-0.2%	✅
.NET 6 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms	195.08 ± (194.71 - 195.45) ms	193.19 ± (192.76 - 193.63) ms	-1.0%	✅
process.time_to_main_ms	72.70 ± (72.56 - 72.84) ms	71.70 ± (71.55 - 71.85) ms	-1.4%	✅
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count	4 ± (4 - 4)	4 ± (4 - 4)	+0.0%	✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed	16.40 ± (16.34 - 16.46) MB	16.19 ± (16.06 - 16.31) MB	-1.3%	✅
runtime.dotnet.threads.count	20 ± (20 - 20)	20 ± (19 - 20)	-2.0%	✅
.NET 6 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms	601.42 ± (598.77 - 604.07) ms	598.82 ± (596.38 - 601.25) ms	-0.4%	✅
process.time_to_main_ms	515.46 ± (514.38 - 516.54) ms	518.87 ± (517.83 - 519.92) ms	+0.7%	✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count	4 ± (4 - 4)	4 ± (4 - 4)	+0.0%	✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed	61.79 ± (61.70 - 61.88) MB	61.70 ± (61.61 - 61.79) MB	-0.2%	✅
runtime.dotnet.threads.count	30 ± (30 - 30)	30 ± (30 - 30)	+0.1%	✅⬆️
.NET 8 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms	193.11 ± (192.65 - 193.57) ms	189.64 ± (189.36 - 189.92) ms	-1.8%	✅
process.time_to_main_ms	71.23 ± (71.03 - 71.43) ms	69.90 ± (69.78 - 70.02) ms	-1.9%	✅
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count	4 ± (4 - 4)	4 ± (4 - 4)	+0.0%	✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed	11.71 ± (11.69 - 11.73) MB	11.80 ± (11.75 - 11.85) MB	+0.8%	✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count	18 ± (18 - 18)	18 ± (18 - 18)	-0.4%	✅
.NET 8 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms	189.90 ± (189.56 - 190.23) ms	188.63 ± (188.40 - 188.85) ms	-0.7%	✅
process.time_to_main_ms	71.31 ± (71.19 - 71.42) ms	70.75 ± (70.67 - 70.83) ms	-0.8%	✅
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count	4 ± (4 - 4)	4 ± (4 - 4)	+0.0%	✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed	11.82 ± (11.79 - 11.84) MB	11.79 ± (11.72 - 11.86) MB	-0.2%	✅
runtime.dotnet.threads.count	19 ± (19 - 19)	19 ± (18 - 19)	-2.6%	✅
.NET 8 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms	516.74 ± (513.84 - 519.64) ms	521.70 ± (519.14 - 524.27) ms	+1.0%	✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms	474.42 ± (473.61 - 475.24) ms	471.32 ± (470.65 - 471.99) ms	-0.7%	✅
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count	4 ± (4 - 4)	4 ± (4 - 4)	+0.0%	✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed	50.74 ± (50.71 - 50.77) MB	50.73 ± (50.70 - 50.76) MB	-0.0%	✅
runtime.dotnet.threads.count	30 ± (30 - 30)	30 ± (30 - 30)	-0.5%	✅

Comparison explanation

Execution-time benchmarks measure the whole time it takes to execute a program, and are intended to measure the one-off costs. Cases where the execution time results for the PR are worse than latest master results are highlighted in **red**. The following thresholds were used for comparing the execution times:

Welch test with statistical test for significance of 5%
Only results indicating a difference greater than 5% and 5 ms are considered.

Note that these results are based on a single point-in-time result for each branch. For full results, see the dashboard.

Graphs show the p99 interval based on the mean and StdDev of the test run, as well as the mean value of the run (shown as a diamond below the graph).

Duration charts

FakeDbCommand (.NET Framework 4.8)

gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET Framework 4.8)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8430) - mean (72ms)  : 69, 75
    master - mean (77ms)  : 67, 87

    section Bailout
    This PR (8430) - mean (76ms)  : 74, 78
    master - mean (81ms)  : 72, 91

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8430) - mean (1,069ms)  : 1024, 1114
    master - mean (1,161ms)  : 1045, 1278

FakeDbCommand (.NET Core 3.1)

gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET Core 3.1)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8430) - mean (112ms)  : 108, 115
    master - mean (132ms)  : 126, 139

    section Bailout
    This PR (8430) - mean (113ms)  : 110, 115
    master - mean (133ms)  : 126, 139

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8430) - mean (782ms)  : 758, 806
    master - mean (807ms)  : 769, 844

FakeDbCommand (.NET 6)

gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET 6)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8430) - mean (99ms)  : 95, 102
    master - mean (104ms)  : 98, 109

    section Bailout
    This PR (8430) - mean (100ms)  : 97, 103
    master - mean (104ms)  : 100, 108

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8430) - mean (932ms)  : 900, 964
    master - mean (944ms)  : 903, 985

FakeDbCommand (.NET 8)

gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET 8)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8430) - mean (98ms)  : 95, 101
    master - mean (101ms)  : 97, 106

    section Bailout
    This PR (8430) - mean (99ms)  : 97, 100
    master - mean (102ms)  : 98, 106

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8430) - mean (812ms)  : 778, 846
    master - mean (825ms)  : 788, 862

HttpMessageHandler (.NET Framework 4.8)

gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET Framework 4.8)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8430) - mean (195ms)  : 190, 200
    master - mean (194ms)  : 190, 199

    section Bailout
    This PR (8430) - mean (198ms)  : 195, 200
    master - mean (198ms)  : 195, 201

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8430) - mean (1,157ms)  : 1107, 1208
    master - mean (1,159ms)  : 1114, 1204

HttpMessageHandler (.NET Core 3.1)

gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET Core 3.1)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8430) - mean (281ms)  : 275, 287
    master - mean (279ms)  : 273, 285

    section Bailout
    This PR (8430) - mean (281ms)  : 275, 288
    master - mean (281ms)  : 275, 286

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8430) - mean (941ms)  : 919, 962
    master - mean (942ms)  : 918, 966

HttpMessageHandler (.NET 6)

gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET 6)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8430) - mean (273ms)  : 266, 279
    master - mean (274ms)  : 267, 282

    section Bailout
    This PR (8430) - mean (273ms)  : 267, 279
    master - mean (276ms)  : 272, 280

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8430) - mean (1,148ms)  : 1109, 1187
    master - mean (1,146ms)  : 1118, 1175

HttpMessageHandler (.NET 8)

gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET 8)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8430) - mean (269ms)  : 265, 273
    master - mean (274ms)  : 268, 281

    section Bailout
    This PR (8430) - mean (269ms)  : 265, 272
    master - mean (271ms)  : 267, 275

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8430) - mean (1,026ms)  : 978, 1074
    master - mean (1,024ms)  : 984, 1064

pr-commenter · 2026-04-08T22:17:23Z

Benchmarks

Benchmark execution time: 2026-04-10 18:15:50

Comparing candidate commit 552a8eb in PR branch steven/service-stack-redis-test-container with baseline commit 58f22e8 in branch master.

Found 28 performance improvements and 41 performance regressions! Performance is the same for 211 metrics, 8 unstable metrics.

Explanation

This is an A/B test comparing a candidate commit's performance against that of a baseline commit. Performance changes are noted in the tables below as:

🟩 = significantly better candidate vs. baseline
🟥 = significantly worse candidate vs. baseline

We compute a confidence interval (CI) over the relative difference of means between metrics from the candidate and baseline commits, considering the baseline as the reference.

If the CI is entirely outside the configured SIGNIFICANT_IMPACT_THRESHOLD (or the deprecated UNCONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD), the change is considered significant.

Feel free to reach out to #apm-benchmarking-platform on Slack if you have any questions.

More details about the CI and significant changes

You can imagine this CI as a range of values that is likely to contain the true difference of means between the candidate and baseline commits.

CIs of the difference of means are often centered around 0%, because often changes are not that big:

---------------------------------(------|---^--------)-------------------------------->
                              -0.6%    0%  0.3%     +1.2%
                                 |          |        |
         lower bound of the CI --'          |        |
sample mean (center of the CI) -------------'        |
         upper bound of the CI ----------------------'

As described above, a change is considered significant if the CI is entirely outside the configured SIGNIFICANT_IMPACT_THRESHOLD (or the deprecated UNCONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD).

For instance, for an execution time metric, this confidence interval indicates a significantly worse performance:

----------------------------------------|---------|---(---------^---------)---------->
                                       0%        1%  1.3%      2.2%      3.1%
                                                  |   |         |         |
       significant impact threshold --------------'   |         |         |
                      lower bound of CI --------------'         |         |
       sample mean (center of the CI) --------------------------'         |
                      upper bound of CI ----------------------------------'

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartStopWithChild net6.0

🟩 throughput [+7873.035op/s; +10205.419op/s] or [+6.618%; +8.578%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net472

🟥 execution_time [+311.695ms; +313.682ms] or [+154.674%; +155.660%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net6.0

🟥 execution_time [+379.913ms; +382.619ms] or [+300.154%; +302.292%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces netcoreapp3.1

🟥 execution_time [+400.748ms; +402.630ms] or [+354.647%; +356.312%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleMoreComplexBody net6.0

🟩 execution_time [-16.107ms; -11.933ms] or [-7.522%; -5.573%]
🟩 throughput [+8956.022op/s; +11752.503op/s] or [+6.537%; +8.579%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleMoreComplexBody netcoreapp3.1

🟩 throughput [+5936.727op/s; +8191.911op/s] or [+5.367%; +7.406%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleSimpleBody net6.0

🟩 execution_time [-25.969ms; -20.950ms] or [-11.581%; -9.343%]
🟩 throughput [+85016.305op/s; +109164.967op/s] or [+9.082%; +11.662%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleSimpleBody netcoreapp3.1

🟩 throughput [+90287.244op/s; +106625.933op/s] or [+12.973%; +15.320%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorMoreComplexBody net6.0

🟩 throughput [+8698.859op/s; +11606.240op/s] or [+5.535%; +7.385%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorMoreComplexBody netcoreapp3.1

🟩 throughput [+7091.684op/s; +9736.319op/s] or [+5.649%; +7.756%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorSimpleBody net6.0

🟩 throughput [+429941.398op/s; +450261.308op/s] or [+14.336%; +15.014%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorSimpleBody netcoreapp3.1

🟩 execution_time [-18.773ms; -14.417ms] or [-8.654%; -6.646%]
🟩 throughput [+197325.786op/s; +251092.768op/s] or [+7.832%; +9.967%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeArgs net472

🟥 execution_time [+300.513ms; +301.127ms] or [+150.156%; +150.463%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeArgs net6.0

🟥 execution_time [+299.349ms; +302.551ms] or [+150.962%; +152.577%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeArgs netcoreapp3.1

🟥 execution_time [+300.036ms; +302.623ms] or [+151.135%; +152.438%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeLegacyArgs net472

🟥 execution_time [+297.270ms; +298.128ms] or [+146.007%; +146.428%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeLegacyArgs net6.0

🟥 execution_time [+297.175ms; +300.446ms] or [+145.278%; +146.877%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeLegacyArgs netcoreapp3.1

🟥 execution_time [+299.315ms; +300.696ms] or [+149.597%; +150.287%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmark net6.0

🟥 execution_time [+34.278µs; +61.949µs] or [+7.862%; +14.208%]
🟥 throughput [-293.009op/s; -169.368op/s] or [-12.739%; -7.363%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmarkWithAttack net6.0

🟥 execution_time [+28.513µs; +52.427µs] or [+9.103%; +16.737%]
🟥 throughput [-478.403op/s; -277.835op/s] or [-14.913%; -8.661%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AspNetCoreBenchmark.SendRequest net472

🟥 execution_time [+299.376ms; +300.008ms] or [+149.419%; +149.735%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AspNetCoreBenchmark.SendRequest net6.0

🟩 throughput [+1004.013op/s; +1159.280op/s] or [+8.250%; +9.526%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AspNetCoreBenchmark.SendRequest netcoreapp3.1

🟩 throughput [+718.105op/s; +918.283op/s] or [+6.952%; +8.890%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net472

🟥 throughput [-468.832op/s; -418.291op/s] or [-42.481%; -37.901%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net6.0

🟥 throughput [-738.559op/s; -655.151op/s] or [-49.262%; -43.699%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces netcoreapp3.1

🟥 execution_time [+330.258ms; +339.258ms] or [+197.532%; +202.915%]
🟥 throughput [-397.447op/s; -363.348op/s] or [-27.674%; -25.299%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSlice net472

🟥 execution_time [+252.652µs; +287.370µs] or [+12.715%; +14.462%]
🟥 throughput [-62.970op/s; -56.096op/s] or [-12.513%; -11.147%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OriginalCharSlice net472

🟥 execution_time [+552.722µs; +593.155µs] or [+21.590%; +23.169%]
🟥 throughput [-73.166op/s; -69.011op/s] or [-18.731%; -17.667%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearch net472

🟥 execution_time [+300.182ms; +301.414ms] or [+151.166%; +151.786%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearch net6.0

🟥 execution_time [+301.175ms; +302.489ms] or [+150.919%; +151.578%]
🟩 throughput [+39512.870op/s; +44551.782op/s] or [+6.230%; +7.024%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearch netcoreapp3.1

🟥 execution_time [+302.212ms; +305.208ms] or [+151.819%; +153.324%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearchAsync net472

🟥 execution_time [+300.004ms; +301.377ms] or [+150.652%; +151.342%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearchAsync net6.0

🟥 execution_time [+299.311ms; +300.830ms] or [+147.996%; +148.747%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearchAsync netcoreapp3.1

🟥 execution_time [+304.278ms; +307.886ms] or [+154.222%; +156.050%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.GraphQLBenchmark.ExecuteAsync net472

🟥 execution_time [+302.775ms; +304.715ms] or [+151.966%; +152.940%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.GraphQLBenchmark.ExecuteAsync net6.0

🟥 execution_time [+300.522ms; +301.937ms] or [+149.783%; +150.488%]
🟩 throughput [+61073.754op/s; +65758.683op/s] or [+12.127%; +13.058%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.GraphQLBenchmark.ExecuteAsync netcoreapp3.1

🟥 execution_time [+299.952ms; +302.729ms] or [+149.223%; +150.605%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ILoggerBenchmark.EnrichedLog net6.0

🟩 execution_time [-16.695ms; -13.048ms] or [-7.763%; -6.067%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatAspectBenchmark net6.0

🟩 allocated_mem [-20.475KB; -20.454KB] or [-7.469%; -7.461%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatAspectBenchmark netcoreapp3.1

🟩 allocated_mem [-17.498KB; -17.483KB] or [-6.379%; -6.373%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatBenchmark net6.0

🟥 throughput [-4772.490op/s; -2946.897op/s] or [-20.091%; -12.406%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatBenchmark netcoreapp3.1

🟩 throughput [+1591.639op/s; +3143.236op/s] or [+9.765%; +19.285%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Log4netBenchmark.EnrichedLog net472

🟥 execution_time [+303.114ms; +305.815ms] or [+153.210%; +154.576%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Log4netBenchmark.EnrichedLog net6.0

🟥 execution_time [+302.986ms; +305.908ms] or [+154.219%; +155.706%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Log4netBenchmark.EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1

🟥 execution_time [+300.312ms; +302.275ms] or [+150.343%; +151.326%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.RedisBenchmark.SendReceive net6.0

🟩 throughput [+52468.925op/s; +56651.590op/s] or [+9.931%; +10.723%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SerilogBenchmark.EnrichedLog net472

🟥 execution_time [+300.164ms; +301.833ms] or [+149.605%; +150.436%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SerilogBenchmark.EnrichedLog net6.0

🟥 execution_time [+302.828ms; +304.634ms] or [+152.066%; +152.973%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SerilogBenchmark.EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1

🟥 execution_time [+302.875ms; +305.471ms] or [+153.598%; +154.915%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SingleSpanAspNetCoreBenchmark.SingleSpanAspNetCore net472

🟥 execution_time [+299.201ms; +299.800ms] or [+149.243%; +149.542%]
🟩 throughput [+61261452.209op/s; +61513080.205op/s] or [+44.614%; +44.798%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SingleSpanAspNetCoreBenchmark.SingleSpanAspNetCore net6.0

🟥 execution_time [+423.468ms; +427.279ms] or [+526.658%; +531.397%]
🟩 throughput [+1147.636op/s; +1336.895op/s] or [+8.872%; +10.335%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SingleSpanAspNetCoreBenchmark.SingleSpanAspNetCore netcoreapp3.1

🟥 execution_time [+299.349ms; +300.248ms] or [+149.308%; +149.757%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishScope net6.0

🟩 throughput [+82314.328op/s; +91163.575op/s] or [+7.685%; +8.512%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishSpan net6.0

🟩 throughput [+70339.179op/s; +111904.421op/s] or [+5.444%; +8.662%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishSpan netcoreapp3.1

🟩 throughput [+71482.931op/s; +79975.118op/s] or [+7.099%; +7.943%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishTwoScopes net6.0

🟩 throughput [+47319.473op/s; +53048.798op/s] or [+8.592%; +9.633%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.TraceAnnotationsBenchmark.RunOnMethodBegin net6.0

🟩 throughput [+81354.860op/s; +99719.815op/s] or [+9.089%; +11.141%]

The ARM64 integration test container was missing the Docker socket volume mount, causing Testcontainers to fail with DockerUnavailableException. The x64 IntegrationTests service already had this mount.

Port ServiceStackRedis to Testcontainers

0812487

Mount Docker socket in IntegrationTests.ARM64

552a8eb

The ARM64 integration test container was missing the Docker socket volume mount, causing Testcontainers to fail with DockerUnavailableException. The x64 IntegrationTests service already had this mount.

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Port ServiceStackRedis to Testcontainers#8430

Port ServiceStackRedis to Testcontainers#8430
bouwkast wants to merge 2 commits intosteven/update-test-containers-4from
steven/service-stack-redis-test-container

bouwkast commented Apr 8, 2026

Uh oh!

dd-trace-dotnet-ci-bot bot commented Apr 8, 2026 •

edited

Loading

FakeDbCommand

HttpMessageHandler

Uh oh!

pr-commenter bot commented Apr 8, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Explanation

More details about the CI and significant changes

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

1 participant

Conversation

bouwkast commented Apr 8, 2026

Summary of changes

Reason for change

Implementation details

Test coverage

Other details

Uh oh!

dd-trace-dotnet-ci-bot bot commented Apr 8, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Execution-Time Benchmarks Report ⏱️

FakeDbCommand

HttpMessageHandler

Uh oh!

pr-commenter bot commented Apr 8, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Benchmarks

Explanation

More details about the CI and significant changes

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartStopWithChild net6.0

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net472

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net6.0

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces netcoreapp3.1

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleMoreComplexBody net6.0

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleMoreComplexBody netcoreapp3.1

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleSimpleBody net6.0

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleSimpleBody netcoreapp3.1

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorMoreComplexBody net6.0

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorMoreComplexBody netcoreapp3.1

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorSimpleBody net6.0

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorSimpleBody netcoreapp3.1

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeArgs net472

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeArgs net6.0

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeArgs netcoreapp3.1

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeLegacyArgs net472

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeLegacyArgs net6.0

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeLegacyArgs netcoreapp3.1

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmark net6.0

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmarkWithAttack net6.0

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AspNetCoreBenchmark.SendRequest net472

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AspNetCoreBenchmark.SendRequest net6.0

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AspNetCoreBenchmark.SendRequest netcoreapp3.1

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net472

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net6.0

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces netcoreapp3.1

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSlice net472

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OriginalCharSlice net472

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearch net472

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearch net6.0

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearch netcoreapp3.1

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearchAsync net472

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearchAsync net6.0

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearchAsync netcoreapp3.1

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.GraphQLBenchmark.ExecuteAsync net472

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.GraphQLBenchmark.ExecuteAsync net6.0

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.GraphQLBenchmark.ExecuteAsync netcoreapp3.1

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ILoggerBenchmark.EnrichedLog net6.0

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatAspectBenchmark net6.0

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatAspectBenchmark netcoreapp3.1

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatBenchmark net6.0

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatBenchmark netcoreapp3.1

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Log4netBenchmark.EnrichedLog net472

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Log4netBenchmark.EnrichedLog net6.0

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Log4netBenchmark.EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.RedisBenchmark.SendReceive net6.0

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SerilogBenchmark.EnrichedLog net472

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SerilogBenchmark.EnrichedLog net6.0

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SerilogBenchmark.EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SingleSpanAspNetCoreBenchmark.SingleSpanAspNetCore net472

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SingleSpanAspNetCoreBenchmark.SingleSpanAspNetCore net6.0

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SingleSpanAspNetCoreBenchmark.SingleSpanAspNetCore netcoreapp3.1

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishScope net6.0

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishSpan net6.0

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishSpan netcoreapp3.1

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishTwoScopes net6.0

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.TraceAnnotationsBenchmark.RunOnMethodBegin net6.0

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

dd-trace-dotnet-ci-bot bot commented Apr 8, 2026 •

edited

Loading

pr-commenter bot commented Apr 8, 2026 •

edited

Loading