Fix native validation

[NachoEchevarria]

Summary of changes

Reduce native-symbol validation log noise and update the Alpine x64 symbol snapshot.

Reason for change

nm output flooded CI logs, and current Azure and GitLab Alpine amd64 builds no longer import the ceil symbol.

For example, here:

2026-08-13T04:18:46.0934308Z 04:18:45 [INF] Changed symbols for Datadog.Tracer.Native:
2026-08-13T04:18:46.0934478Z 04:18:45 [INF] -ceil
2026-08-13T04:18:46.0934854Z 04:18:45 [ERR] Found differences in undefined symbols in Datadog.Tracer.Native. These are shown above as both a diff and thefull expected snapshot. Verify that these changes are expected, and will not cause problems. Removing symbols is generally a safe operation, but adding them could cause crashes. If the new symbols are safe to add, update the snapshot file at /build/NativeValidation/native-tracer-symbols-alpine-x64.verified.txt with the new values
2026-08-13T04:18:46.0935505Z ​

Implementation details

• Capture nm output for validation without streaming the full symbol table.
• Log only the number of symbols read.
• Ignore trailing line endings when comparing snapshots.
• Remove ceil from the Alpine x64 verified snapshot.

Test coverage

• Confirmed the ceil removal in amd64 builds.
• Snapshot validation check passes.

Other details

[dd-trace-dotnet-ci-bot]

Execution-Time Benchmarks Report ⏱️

Execution-time results for samples comparing This PR (9020) and master.

⚠️ Potential regressions detected

HttpMessageHandler

Metric	Master (Mean ± 95% CI)	Current (Mean ± 95% CI)	Change	Status
.NET Framework 4.8 - Baseline
duration	201.62 ± (201.56 - 202.46) ms	214.33 ± (213.86 - 214.78) ms	+6.3%	❌⬆️
.NET Framework 4.8 - Bailout
duration	206.01 ± (205.80 - 206.57) ms	217.49 ± (217.29 - 218.24) ms	+5.6%	❌⬆️

📄 View the full report (charts + all metrics) →

[pr-commenter]

Benchmarks

Benchmark execution time: 2026-08-10 17:12:12

Comparing candidate commit 6fc3055 in PR branch nacho/FixNativeValidationAlpine with baseline commit 7a4fb69 in branch master.

📊 Benchmarking dashboard

Found 0 performance improvements and 1 performance regressions! Performance is the same for 71 metrics, 0 unstable metrics, 68 known flaky benchmarks, 58 flaky benchmarks without significant changes.

Explanation

This is an A/B test comparing a candidate commit's performance against that of a baseline commit. Performance changes are noted in the tables below as:

• 🟩 = significantly better candidate vs. baseline
• 🟥 = significantly worse candidate vs. baseline

We compute a confidence interval (CI) over the relative difference of means between metrics from the candidate and baseline commits, considering the baseline as the reference.

If the CI is entirely outside the configured SIGNIFICANT_IMPACT_THRESHOLD (or the deprecated UNCONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD), the change is considered significant.

Feel free to reach out to #apm-benchmarking-platform on Slack if you have any questions.

More details about the CI and significant changes

You can imagine this CI as a range of values that is likely to contain the true difference of means between the candidate and baseline commits.

CIs of the difference of means are often centered around 0%, because often changes are not that big:

---------------------------------(------|---^--------)-------------------------------->
                              -0.6%    0%  0.3%     +1.2%
                                 |          |        |
         lower bound of the CI --'          |        |
sample mean (center of the CI) -------------'        |
         upper bound of the CI ----------------------'

As described above, a change is considered significant if the CI is entirely outside the configured SIGNIFICANT_IMPACT_THRESHOLD (or the deprecated UNCONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD).

For instance, for an execution time metric, this confidence interval indicates a significantly worse performance:

----------------------------------------|---------|---(---------^---------)---------->
                                       0%        1%  1.3%      2.2%      3.1%
                                                  |   |         |         |
       significant impact threshold --------------'   |         |         |
                      lower bound of CI --------------'         |         |
       sample mean (center of the CI) --------------------------'         |
                      upper bound of CI ----------------------------------'

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.HttpClientBenchmark.SendAsync net472

• 🟥 throughput [-5477.861op/s; -5193.912op/s] or [-6.253%; -5.929%]

Known flaky benchmarks

These benchmarks are marked as flaky and will not trigger a failure. Modify FLAKY_BENCHMARKS_REGEX to control which benchmarks are marked as flaky.

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled netcoreapp3.1

• unstable execution_time [-32.971ms; -8.811ms] or [-16.542%; -4.421%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled netcoreapp3.1

• unstable execution_time [+7.295ms; +29.612ms] or [+4.020%; +16.319%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartStopWithChild net472

• 🟥 throughput [-8145.050op/s; -7480.055op/s] or [-9.658%; -8.869%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartStopWithChild netcoreapp3.1

• 🟥 throughput [-10039.306op/s; -8702.125op/s] or [-10.208%; -8.848%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net472

• 🟥 execution_time [+306.113ms; +314.037ms] or [+151.904%; +155.836%]
• 🟥 throughput [-45.009op/s; -40.822op/s] or [-8.098%; -7.345%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net6.0

• 🟥 execution_time [+379.166ms; +381.977ms] or [+299.564%; +301.785%]
• 🟩 throughput [+91.053op/s; +95.856op/s] or [+12.005%; +12.638%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces netcoreapp3.1

• 🟥 execution_time [+393.973ms; +395.901ms] or [+348.651%; +350.357%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleMoreComplexBody net472

• 🟥 allocated_mem [+4.692KB; +4.693KB] or [+98.785%; +98.801%]
• 🟥 throughput [-60580.925op/s; -60229.085op/s] or [-47.135%; -46.861%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleMoreComplexBody net6.0

• 🟥 allocated_mem [+3.816KB; +3.816KB] or [+80.699%; +80.711%]
• 🟩 execution_time [-16.131ms; -11.940ms] or [-7.534%; -5.576%]
• 🟥 throughput [-59907.559op/s; -57145.795op/s] or [-43.729%; -41.713%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleMoreComplexBody netcoreapp3.1

• 🟥 allocated_mem [+4.544KB; +4.544KB] or [+98.261%; +98.274%]
• 🟥 throughput [-48795.401op/s; -46548.739op/s] or [-44.117%; -42.085%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleSimpleBody net472

• 🟥 allocated_mem [+1.316KB; +1.316KB] or [+106.475%; +106.490%]
• 🟥 throughput [-272142.723op/s; -268129.807op/s] or [-27.787%; -27.377%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleSimpleBody net6.0

• 🟥 allocated_mem [+479 bytes; +480 bytes] or [+39.212%; +39.221%]
• 🟩 execution_time [-26.441ms; -21.546ms] or [-11.791%; -9.609%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleSimpleBody netcoreapp3.1

• 🟥 allocated_mem [+1.280KB; +1.280KB] or [+105.947%; +105.963%]
• 🟥 throughput [-163518.769op/s; -147369.559op/s] or [-23.494%; -21.174%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorMoreComplexBody net472

• 🟥 allocated_mem [+3.378KB; +3.378KB] or [+89.003%; +89.017%]
• 🟥 throughput [-72956.380op/s; -72180.507op/s] or [-49.099%; -48.577%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorMoreComplexBody net6.0

• 🟥 allocated_mem [+3.336KB; +3.336KB] or [+88.150%; +88.161%]
• 🟥 throughput [-73125.251op/s; -70245.700op/s] or [-46.528%; -44.696%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorMoreComplexBody netcoreapp3.1

• 🟥 allocated_mem [+3.264KB; +3.264KB] or [+88.493%; +88.506%]
• 🟥 throughput [-57372.210op/s; -54758.872op/s] or [-45.704%; -43.623%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorSimpleBody net6.0

• 🟩 throughput [+265768.157op/s; +293377.056op/s] or [+8.862%; +9.782%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorSimpleBody netcoreapp3.1

• 🟩 execution_time [-19.054ms; -14.722ms] or [-8.783%; -6.786%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeArgs net472

• 🟩 allocated_mem [-13.759KB; -13.757KB] or [-42.326%; -42.318%]
• 🟥 execution_time [+300.997ms; +301.733ms] or [+150.398%; +150.766%]
• 🟩 throughput [+1019.317op/s; +1036.453op/s] or [+11.258%; +11.448%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeArgs net6.0

• 🟩 allocated_mem [-13.722KB; -13.718KB] or [-42.341%; -42.329%]
• 🟥 execution_time [+300.214ms; +303.470ms] or [+151.398%; +153.040%]
• 🟩 throughput [+2411.595op/s; +2625.133op/s] or [+18.445%; +20.078%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeArgs netcoreapp3.1

• 🟩 allocated_mem [-13.722KB; -13.718KB] or [-42.341%; -42.329%]
• 🟥 execution_time [+300.644ms; +303.015ms] or [+151.441%; +152.636%]
• 🟩 throughput [+1775.708op/s; +1901.000op/s] or [+17.144%; +18.353%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeLegacyArgs net472

• 🟥 execution_time [+296.011ms; +297.583ms] or [+145.389%; +146.161%]
• 🟩 throughput [+590.002op/s; +601.410op/s] or [+15.641%; +15.944%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeLegacyArgs net6.0

• 🟥 execution_time [+300.261ms; +302.852ms] or [+146.787%; +148.053%]
• 🟩 throughput [+2604.676op/s; +2684.419op/s] or [+37.841%; +39.000%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeLegacyArgs netcoreapp3.1

• 🟥 execution_time [+300.736ms; +301.408ms] or [+150.307%; +150.644%]
• 🟩 throughput [+1396.019op/s; +1426.266op/s] or [+27.710%; +28.310%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmark net472

• 🟩 execution_time [-146.330µs; -141.862µs] or [-30.044%; -29.126%]
• 🟩 throughput [+847.960op/s; +879.009op/s] or [+41.299%; +42.812%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmark net6.0

• 🟩 execution_time [-137.916µs; -111.091µs] or [-31.631%; -25.479%]
• 🟩 throughput [+848.998op/s; +974.124op/s] or [+36.911%; +42.351%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmark netcoreapp3.1

• 🟩 execution_time [-141.457µs; -119.459µs] or [-30.308%; -25.595%]
• 🟩 throughput [+766.468op/s; +849.264op/s] or [+35.382%; +39.204%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmarkWithAttack net472

• 🟩 execution_time [-128.341µs; -123.911µs] or [-34.651%; -33.455%]
• 🟩 throughput [+1369.193op/s; +1422.404op/s] or [+50.709%; +52.679%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmarkWithAttack net6.0

• 🟩 execution_time [-102.042µs; -78.368µs] or [-32.577%; -25.019%]
• 🟩 throughput [+1175.398op/s; +1380.387op/s] or [+36.641%; +43.031%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmarkWithAttack netcoreapp3.1

• 🟩 execution_time [-135.830µs; -113.402µs] or [-37.158%; -31.022%]
• 🟩 throughput [+1295.834op/s; +1434.437op/s] or [+46.502%; +51.476%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AspNetCoreBenchmark.SendRequest net472

• 🟥 execution_time [+299.299ms; +300.271ms] or [+149.381%; +149.866%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AspNetCoreBenchmark.SendRequest net6.0

• unstable execution_time [+414.805ms; +424.510ms] or [+450.703%; +461.248%]
• 🟩 throughput [+697.723op/s; +896.545op/s] or [+5.733%; +7.367%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AspNetCoreBenchmark.SendRequest netcoreapp3.1

• unstable execution_time [+301.069ms; +352.702ms] or [+228.599%; +267.803%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net472

• unstable execution_time [+343.265ms; +398.501ms] or [+157.830%; +183.227%]
• 🟥 throughput [-548.712op/s; -502.358op/s] or [-49.719%; -45.519%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net6.0

• unstable execution_time [+204.531ms; +337.766ms] or [+87.162%; +143.942%]
• 🟥 throughput [-667.992op/s; -584.394op/s] or [-44.555%; -38.979%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces netcoreapp3.1

• 🟥 allocated_mem [+2.305KB; +2.308KB] or [+5.442%; +5.450%]
• unstable execution_time [+330.640ms; +347.651ms] or [+197.761%; +207.936%]
• 🟥 throughput [-398.910op/s; -359.753op/s] or [-27.776%; -25.049%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSlice net6.0

• 🟥 execution_time [+205.448µs; +218.485µs] or [+14.114%; +15.009%]
• 🟥 throughput [-89.695op/s; -84.756op/s] or [-13.056%; -12.337%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OriginalCharSlice net472

• 🟥 execution_time [+146.398µs; +160.656µs] or [+5.718%; +6.275%]
• 🟥 throughput [-23.049op/s; -21.087op/s] or [-5.901%; -5.399%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearch net472

• 🟥 execution_time [+302.285ms; +304.698ms] or [+152.225%; +153.440%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearch net6.0

• 🟥 execution_time [+301.377ms; +302.396ms] or [+151.020%; +151.531%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearch netcoreapp3.1

• 🟥 execution_time [+302.586ms; +306.407ms] or [+152.006%; +153.926%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearchAsync net472

• 🟥 execution_time [+301.458ms; +302.749ms] or [+151.382%; +152.030%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearchAsync net6.0

• 🟥 execution_time [+297.342ms; +299.660ms] or [+147.022%; +148.169%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearchAsync netcoreapp3.1

• 🟥 execution_time [+302.580ms; +306.319ms] or [+153.361%; +155.256%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.GraphQLBenchmark.ExecuteAsync net472

• 🟥 execution_time [+299.567ms; +301.790ms] or [+150.355%; +151.471%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.GraphQLBenchmark.ExecuteAsync net6.0

• 🟥 execution_time [+297.734ms; +300.894ms] or [+148.393%; +149.968%]
• 🟩 throughput [+47230.189op/s; +54168.578op/s] or [+9.378%; +10.756%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.GraphQLBenchmark.ExecuteAsync netcoreapp3.1

• 🟥 execution_time [+299.195ms; +302.593ms] or [+148.847%; +150.537%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ILoggerBenchmark.EnrichedLog net6.0

• 🟩 execution_time [-15.847ms; -12.180ms] or [-7.369%; -5.664%]
• 🟩 throughput [+20265.462op/s; +27559.263op/s] or [+5.559%; +7.560%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatAspectBenchmark net472

• unstable execution_time [+16.863µs; +63.716µs] or [+4.165%; +15.738%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatAspectBenchmark net6.0

• 🟩 allocated_mem [-19.924KB; -19.901KB] or [-7.268%; -7.259%]
• unstable execution_time [+15.339µs; +133.043µs] or [+3.032%; +26.295%]
• unstable throughput [-283.701op/s; +13.148op/s] or [-14.157%; +0.656%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatAspectBenchmark netcoreapp3.1

• unstable execution_time [-36.236µs; +27.315µs] or [-6.279%; +4.733%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatBenchmark net6.0

• unstable execution_time [+7.654µs; +13.125µs] or [+18.092%; +31.023%]
• 🟥 throughput [-5479.690op/s; -3489.028op/s] or [-23.068%; -14.688%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatBenchmark netcoreapp3.1

• unstable execution_time [-13.686µs; -5.452µs] or [-21.233%; -8.459%]
• unstable throughput [+1392.341op/s; +3208.485op/s] or [+8.542%; +19.685%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Log4netBenchmark.EnrichedLog net472

• 🟥 execution_time [+302.224ms; +303.386ms] or [+152.761%; +153.348%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Log4netBenchmark.EnrichedLog net6.0

• 🟥 execution_time [+302.735ms; +305.542ms] or [+154.091%; +155.520%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Log4netBenchmark.EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1

• 🟥 execution_time [+298.896ms; +300.871ms] or [+149.635%; +150.623%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.RedisBenchmark.SendReceive net472

• 🟥 throughput [-26462.272op/s; -24781.138op/s] or [-7.325%; -6.860%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SerilogBenchmark.EnrichedLog net472

• 🟥 execution_time [+300.075ms; +301.944ms] or [+149.560%; +150.492%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SerilogBenchmark.EnrichedLog net6.0

• 🟥 execution_time [+301.436ms; +304.361ms] or [+151.367%; +152.836%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SerilogBenchmark.EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1

• 🟥 execution_time [+302.970ms; +305.339ms] or [+153.647%; +154.848%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SingleSpanAspNetCoreBenchmark.SingleSpanAspNetCore net472

• 🟥 execution_time [+300.061ms; +300.916ms] or [+149.672%; +150.098%]
• 🟩 throughput [+66059806.057op/s; +66434466.054op/s] or [+48.109%; +48.382%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SingleSpanAspNetCoreBenchmark.SingleSpanAspNetCore net6.0

• 🟥 execution_time [+416.137ms; +421.221ms] or [+517.541%; +523.863%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SingleSpanAspNetCoreBenchmark.SingleSpanAspNetCore netcoreapp3.1

• 🟥 execution_time [+299.219ms; +300.404ms] or [+149.244%; +149.835%]
• 🟩 throughput [+18198089.213op/s; +19187567.897op/s] or [+8.061%; +8.499%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishScope net6.0

• 🟩 throughput [+64177.311op/s; +71334.076op/s] or [+5.992%; +6.660%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishSpan netcoreapp3.1

• 🟩 throughput [+71981.982op/s; +81218.295op/s] or [+7.149%; +8.066%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishTwoScopes net6.0

• 🟩 throughput [+48467.994op/s; +54370.250op/s] or [+8.801%; +9.873%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishTwoScopes netcoreapp3.1

• 🟩 throughput [+27090.999op/s; +37414.823op/s] or [+6.064%; +8.375%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.TraceAnnotationsBenchmark.RunOnMethodBegin net6.0

• 🟩 throughput [+58307.942op/s; +78312.664op/s] or [+6.514%; +8.749%]

Known flaky benchmarks without significant changes:

• scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan net472
• scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan net6.0
• scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan netcoreapp3.1
• scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled net472
• scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled net6.0
• scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
• scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled net472
• scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled net6.0
• scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
• scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled net472
• scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled net6.0
• scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
• scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled net472
• scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled net6.0
• scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled net472
• scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled net6.0
• scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
• scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan net472
• scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan net6.0
• scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan netcoreapp3.1
• scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled net472
• scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled net6.0
• scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
• scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled net472
• scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled net6.0
• scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
• scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_RecordException_Sampled net472
• scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_RecordException_Sampled net6.0
• scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_RecordException_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
• scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled net472
• scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled net6.0
• scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled net472
• scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled net6.0
• scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
• scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled net472
• scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled net6.0
• scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
• scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartStopWithChild net6.0
• scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorSimpleBody net472
• scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSlice net472
• scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSlice netcoreapp3.1
• scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSliceWithPool net472
• scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSliceWithPool net6.0
• scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSliceWithPool netcoreapp3.1
• scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OriginalCharSlice net6.0
• scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OriginalCharSlice netcoreapp3.1
• scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ILoggerBenchmark.EnrichedLog net472
• scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ILoggerBenchmark.EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1
• scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatBenchmark net472
• scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.RedisBenchmark.SendReceive net6.0
• scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.RedisBenchmark.SendReceive netcoreapp3.1
• scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishScope net472
• scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishScope netcoreapp3.1
• scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishSpan net472
• scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishSpan net6.0
• scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishTwoScopes net472
• scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.TraceAnnotationsBenchmark.RunOnMethodBegin net472
• scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.TraceAnnotationsBenchmark.RunOnMethodBegin netcoreapp3.1

[NachoEchevarria]

@codex review

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. Keep them coming!

Reviewed commit: 6fc30554e8

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".