Skip to content

feat(otel): Emit OpenTelemetry HTTP semantic conventions on HTTP server spans (ASP.NET) - #9027

Draft
zacharycmontoya wants to merge 7 commits into
otel-aspnetcorefrom
otel-aspnet-rebased
Draft

feat(otel): Emit OpenTelemetry HTTP semantic conventions on HTTP server spans (ASP.NET)#9027
zacharycmontoya wants to merge 7 commits into
otel-aspnetcorefrom
otel-aspnet-rebased

Conversation

@zacharycmontoya

@zacharycmontoya zacharycmontoya commented Aug 11, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary of changes

Reason for change

Implementation details

Test coverage

Other details

@zacharycmontoya zacharycmontoya changed the title Otel aspnet rebased feat(otel): Emit OpenTelemetry HTTP semantic conventions on HTTP server spans (ASP.NET) Aug 11, 2026
@dd-trace-dotnet-ci-bot

dd-trace-dotnet-ci-bot Bot commented Aug 12, 2026 •
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Execution-Time Benchmarks Report ⏱️

Execution-time results for samples comparing This PR (9027) and master.

✅ No regressions detected

📄 View the full report (charts + all metrics) →

@pr-commenter

pr-commenter Bot commented Aug 12, 2026 •
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Benchmarks

Benchmark execution time: 2026-08-14 23:47:24

Comparing candidate commit 9d283d3 in PR branch otel-aspnet-rebased with baseline commit 90443cf in branch master.

📊 Benchmarking dashboard

Found 0 performance improvements and 1 performance regressions! Performance is the same for 71 metrics, 0 unstable metrics, 65 known flaky benchmarks, 61 flaky benchmarks without significant changes.

Explanation

This is an A/B test comparing a candidate commit's performance against that of a baseline commit. Performance changes are noted in the tables below as:

  • 🟩 = significantly better candidate vs. baseline
  • 🟥 = significantly worse candidate vs. baseline

We compute a confidence interval (CI) over the relative difference of means between metrics from the candidate and baseline commits, considering the baseline as the reference.

If the CI is entirely outside the configured SIGNIFICANT_IMPACT_THRESHOLD (or the deprecated UNCONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD), the change is considered significant.

Feel free to reach out to #apm-benchmarking-platform on Slack if you have any questions.

More details about the CI and significant changes

You can imagine this CI as a range of values that is likely to contain the true difference of means between the candidate and baseline commits.

CIs of the difference of means are often centered around 0%, because often changes are not that big:

---------------------------------(------|---^--------)-------------------------------->
                              -0.6%    0%  0.3%     +1.2%
                                 |          |        |
         lower bound of the CI --'          |        |
sample mean (center of the CI) -------------'        |
         upper bound of the CI ----------------------'

As described above, a change is considered significant if the CI is entirely outside the configured SIGNIFICANT_IMPACT_THRESHOLD (or the deprecated UNCONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD).

For instance, for an execution time metric, this confidence interval indicates a significantly worse performance:

----------------------------------------|---------|---(---------^---------)---------->
                                       0%        1%  1.3%      2.2%      3.1%
                                                  |   |         |         |
       significant impact threshold --------------'   |         |         |
                      lower bound of CI --------------'         |         |
       sample mean (center of the CI) --------------------------'         |
                      upper bound of CI ----------------------------------'

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.DbCommandBenchmark.ExecuteNonQuery net472

  • 🟥 throughput [-35545.056op/s; -32116.760op/s] or [-10.011%; -9.046%]

Known flaky benchmarks

These benchmarks are marked as flaky and will not trigger a failure. Modify FLAKY_BENCHMARKS_REGEX to control which benchmarks are marked as flaky.

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartStopWithChild net472

  • 🟥 throughput [-8695.372op/s; -8182.309op/s] or [-10.310%; -9.702%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartStopWithChild netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable execution_time [-27.692ms; -6.693ms] or [-13.928%; -3.366%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-9194.228op/s; -7912.105op/s] or [-9.349%; -8.045%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+304.843ms; +312.920ms] or [+151.274%; +155.282%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-43.542op/s; -39.901op/s] or [-7.834%; -7.179%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+385.047ms; +385.998ms] or [+304.210%; +304.962%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+84.315op/s; +85.973op/s] or [+11.117%; +11.335%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+398.986ms; +401.178ms] or [+353.088%; +355.028%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleMoreComplexBody net472

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+4.693KB; +4.694KB] or [+98.806%; +98.821%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-60727.302op/s; -60343.893op/s] or [-47.249%; -46.951%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleMoreComplexBody net6.0

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+3.816KB; +3.816KB] or [+80.699%; +80.711%]
  • 🟩 execution_time [-15.855ms; -11.685ms] or [-7.405%; -5.457%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-59717.096op/s; -56951.705op/s] or [-43.590%; -41.572%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleMoreComplexBody netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+4.544KB; +4.544KB] or [+98.261%; +98.274%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-48534.557op/s; -46276.623op/s] or [-43.881%; -41.839%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleSimpleBody net472

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+1.315KB; +1.315KB] or [+106.388%; +106.404%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-253148.269op/s; -249899.990op/s] or [-25.848%; -25.516%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleSimpleBody net6.0

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+479 bytes; +480 bytes] or [+39.212%; +39.221%]
  • 🟩 execution_time [-26.962ms; -22.120ms] or [-12.024%; -9.865%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleSimpleBody netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+1.280KB; +1.280KB] or [+105.947%; +105.963%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-161178.161op/s; -144842.273op/s] or [-23.158%; -20.811%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorMoreComplexBody net472

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+3.378KB; +3.378KB] or [+89.003%; +89.017%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-72669.255op/s; -71917.356op/s] or [-48.906%; -48.400%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorMoreComplexBody net6.0

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+3.336KB; +3.336KB] or [+88.150%; +88.161%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-72953.405op/s; -70073.601op/s] or [-46.419%; -44.587%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorMoreComplexBody netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+3.264KB; +3.264KB] or [+88.493%; +88.506%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-55977.081op/s; -53346.021op/s] or [-44.593%; -42.497%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorSimpleBody net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+305656.070op/s; +326941.735op/s] or [+10.192%; +10.902%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorSimpleBody netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 execution_time [-19.386ms; -15.030ms] or [-8.936%; -6.928%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeArgs net472

  • 🟩 allocated_mem [-13.759KB; -13.756KB] or [-42.324%; -42.316%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.621ms; +301.335ms] or [+150.210%; +150.567%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+1027.767op/s; +1043.567op/s] or [+11.352%; +11.526%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeArgs net6.0

  • 🟩 allocated_mem [-13.722KB; -13.718KB] or [-42.341%; -42.329%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.518ms; +303.926ms] or [+151.552%; +153.270%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+2335.674op/s; +2549.794op/s] or [+17.864%; +19.502%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeArgs netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 allocated_mem [-13.722KB; -13.718KB] or [-42.341%; -42.329%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.170ms; +302.558ms] or [+151.202%; +152.405%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+1817.488op/s; +1946.125op/s] or [+17.547%; +18.789%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeLegacyArgs net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+296.783ms; +297.689ms] or [+145.768%; +146.213%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+599.379op/s; +609.795op/s] or [+15.890%; +16.166%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeLegacyArgs net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.093ms; +301.730ms] or [+146.215%; +147.505%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+2497.533op/s; +2621.479op/s] or [+36.284%; +38.085%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeLegacyArgs netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.336ms; +301.288ms] or [+150.108%; +150.583%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+1406.611op/s; +1435.236op/s] or [+27.920%; +28.488%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmark net472

  • 🟩 execution_time [-145.580µs; -141.144µs] or [-29.889%; -28.979%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+841.839op/s; +872.631op/s] or [+41.001%; +42.501%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmark net6.0

  • 🟩 execution_time [-139.509µs; -112.554µs] or [-31.996%; -25.814%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+863.974op/s; +992.398op/s] or [+37.562%; +43.146%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmark netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 execution_time [-140.636µs; -118.504µs] or [-30.132%; -25.390%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+757.858op/s; +843.155op/s] or [+34.984%; +38.922%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmarkWithAttack net472

  • 🟩 execution_time [-127.206µs; -122.954µs] or [-34.345%; -33.197%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+1353.293op/s; +1402.738op/s] or [+50.120%; +51.951%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmarkWithAttack net6.0

  • 🟩 execution_time [-101.644µs; -78.039µs] or [-32.450%; -24.914%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+1168.692op/s; +1370.676op/s] or [+36.432%; +42.728%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmarkWithAttack netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 execution_time [-133.948µs; -111.312µs] or [-36.643%; -30.450%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+1259.705op/s; +1406.591op/s] or [+45.206%; +50.477%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AspNetCoreBenchmark.SendRequest net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.668ms; +300.461ms] or [+149.565%; +149.961%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AspNetCoreBenchmark.SendRequest net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [+313.689ms; +385.848ms] or [+340.836%; +419.239%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+676.873op/s; +870.892op/s] or [+5.562%; +7.156%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AspNetCoreBenchmark.SendRequest netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable execution_time [+294.052ms; +348.330ms] or [+223.271%; +264.484%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net472

  • unstable execution_time [+341.308ms; +398.440ms] or [+156.930%; +183.199%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-597.869op/s; -546.901op/s] or [-54.173%; -49.555%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [+142.246ms; +287.742ms] or [+60.619%; +122.623%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-673.263op/s; -589.758op/s] or [-44.907%; -39.337%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+323.352ms; +337.865ms] or [+193.402%; +202.083%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-373.427op/s; -337.910op/s] or [-26.001%; -23.528%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSlice netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable throughput [+18.695op/s; +65.891op/s] or [+5.374%; +18.940%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OriginalCharSlice net6.0

  • 🟩 execution_time [-136.474µs; -101.752µs] or [-6.913%; -5.154%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+28.684op/s; +37.402op/s] or [+5.662%; +7.384%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearch net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+302.656ms; +304.814ms] or [+152.412%; +153.499%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearch net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [+295.023ms; +322.827ms] or [+147.837%; +161.769%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearch netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+303.192ms; +307.230ms] or [+152.311%; +154.339%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearchAsync net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.648ms; +301.929ms] or [+150.975%; +151.619%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearchAsync net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+297.575ms; +300.152ms] or [+147.138%; +148.412%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearchAsync netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+304.524ms; +308.264ms] or [+154.346%; +156.242%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.GraphQLBenchmark.ExecuteAsync net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+302.565ms; +304.282ms] or [+151.860%; +152.722%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.GraphQLBenchmark.ExecuteAsync net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.168ms; +301.453ms] or [+149.108%; +150.247%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+44901.926op/s; +51651.391op/s] or [+8.916%; +10.256%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.GraphQLBenchmark.ExecuteAsync netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.996ms; +308.178ms] or [+149.245%; +153.316%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ILoggerBenchmark.EnrichedLog net6.0

  • 🟩 execution_time [-16.859ms; -13.171ms] or [-7.840%; -6.125%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+22619.082op/s; +29408.029op/s] or [+6.205%; +8.067%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatAspectBenchmark net472

  • unstable execution_time [+20.626µs; +65.657µs] or [+5.095%; +16.218%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatAspectBenchmark net6.0

  • 🟩 allocated_mem [-20.224KB; -20.201KB] or [-7.377%; -7.369%]
  • unstable execution_time [-39.907µs; +20.950µs] or [-7.887%; +4.141%]
  • unstable throughput [-62.966op/s; +153.486op/s] or [-3.142%; +7.659%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatAspectBenchmark netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable execution_time [-67.648µs; -5.837µs] or [-11.723%; -1.012%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatBenchmark net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [+9.167µs; +14.304µs] or [+21.668%; +33.809%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-5983.085op/s; -4043.936op/s] or [-25.187%; -17.024%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatBenchmark netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable execution_time [-13.869µs; -5.829µs] or [-21.518%; -9.043%]
  • unstable throughput [+1472.518op/s; +3204.299op/s] or [+9.034%; +19.659%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Log4netBenchmark.EnrichedLog net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+301.366ms; +302.774ms] or [+152.327%; +153.039%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Log4netBenchmark.EnrichedLog net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+302.567ms; +305.188ms] or [+154.006%; +155.340%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Log4netBenchmark.EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.859ms; +302.237ms] or [+150.116%; +151.307%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.RedisBenchmark.SendReceive net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+32669.685op/s; +39048.040op/s] or [+6.184%; +7.391%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SerilogBenchmark.EnrichedLog net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.148ms; +301.502ms] or [+149.098%; +150.272%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SerilogBenchmark.EnrichedLog net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.945ms; +303.524ms] or [+151.120%; +152.415%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SerilogBenchmark.EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+303.322ms; +305.447ms] or [+153.825%; +154.903%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SingleSpanAspNetCoreBenchmark.SingleSpanAspNetCore net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.048ms; +300.973ms] or [+149.666%; +150.127%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+66045986.713op/s; +66361666.804op/s] or [+48.099%; +48.329%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SingleSpanAspNetCoreBenchmark.SingleSpanAspNetCore net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [+324.083ms; +394.185ms] or [+403.054%; +490.239%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SingleSpanAspNetCoreBenchmark.SingleSpanAspNetCore netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.614ms; +300.725ms] or [+149.441%; +149.995%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+17880896.867op/s; +18864795.465op/s] or [+7.920%; +8.356%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishScope net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+82429.539op/s; +100030.793op/s] or [+7.696%; +9.340%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishSpan net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+88486.446op/s; +118255.588op/s] or [+6.849%; +9.153%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishSpan netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 throughput [+67179.438op/s; +77795.113op/s] or [+6.672%; +7.726%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishTwoScopes net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+49231.784op/s; +54810.854op/s] or [+8.940%; +9.953%]

Known flaky benchmarks without significant changes:

  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_RecordException_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_RecordException_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_RecordException_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartStopWithChild net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorSimpleBody net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSlice net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSlice net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSliceWithPool net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSliceWithPool net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSliceWithPool netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OriginalCharSlice net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OriginalCharSlice netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ILoggerBenchmark.EnrichedLog net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ILoggerBenchmark.EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatBenchmark net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.RedisBenchmark.SendReceive net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.RedisBenchmark.SendReceive netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishScope net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishScope netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishSpan net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishTwoScopes net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishTwoScopes netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.TraceAnnotationsBenchmark.RunOnMethodBegin net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.TraceAnnotationsBenchmark.RunOnMethodBegin net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.TraceAnnotationsBenchmark.RunOnMethodBegin netcoreapp3.1

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Aug 14, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Snapshots difference summary

The following differences have been observed in committed snapshots. It is meant to help the reviewer.
The diff is simplistic, so please check some files anyway while we improve it.

1 occurrences of :

-      http.request.method: GET,
[...]
-      server.address: 127.0.0.1,
[...]
-      url.path: /proxy,
-      url.scheme: http,
[...]
-      server.port: 00000,

1 occurrences of :

-      http.request.method: GET,
[...]
-      server.address: 127.0.0.1,
[...]
-      url.path: /,
-      url.scheme: http,

1 occurrences of :

-      server.port: 00000,

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

No reviews

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@zacharycmontoya