Skip to content

Fix globstar expansion in CI Vis code owners - #9045

Draft
bouwkast wants to merge 6 commits into
masterfrom
steven/fix-glob-patterns-no-dir
Draft

Fix globstar expansion in CI Vis code owners#9045
bouwkast wants to merge 6 commits into
masterfrom
steven/fix-glob-patterns-no-dir

Conversation

@bouwkast

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Summary of changes

Makes it so that /**/ patterns when expanded/computed/regexed by CI Visibility will handle cases where there are zero matches.

Reason for change

We ran into this issue with /tracer/test/Datadog.Trace.ClrProfiler.IntegrationTests/**/DataStreamsMonitoring* in our CODEOWNERs where this specific test Datadog.Trace.ClrProfiler.IntegrationTests.DataStreamsMonitoringHttpClientTests at the top level of Datadog.Trace.ClrProfiler.IntegrationTests wasn't being matched to the correct teams in CI Visibility.

This was because /**/ was being interpreted as /.*/ for the cases with no directory (works fine for cases where there are directories though)

/.*/ -> match 0 to N characters but if no matches becomes // exactly.

Implementation details

This changes /.*/ to /(?:.*/)?

  • Match the first slash, then match (optionally) anything that comes after

Test coverage

some basic tests added

Also played around with it in regex101 to see if it works and it seems like it does

Other details

@bouwkast
bouwkast requested review from a team as code owners August 13, 2026 13:53

@andrewlock andrewlock left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM if it works

Comment on lines +144 to +147
rx = rx.Replace("/\\*\\*/", "/(?:.*/)?");

// A leading globstar followed by a slash also matches at the repository root.
rx = rx.Replace("\\*\\*/", "(?:.*/)?");

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't think we want . because that matches / as well

Suggested change
rx = rx.Replace("/\\*\\*/", "/(?:.*/)?");
// A leading globstar followed by a slash also matches at the repository root.
rx = rx.Replace("\\*\\*/", "(?:.*/)?");
rx = rx.Replace("/\\*\\*/", "/(?:[^/]*/)?");
// A leading globstar followed by a slash also matches at the repository root.
rx = rx.Replace("\\*\\*/", "(?:[^/]*/)?");

@bouwkast

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Will re-raise this next week-ish

@pr-commenter

pr-commenter Bot commented Aug 13, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Benchmarks

Benchmark execution time: 2026-08-13 16:35:09

Comparing candidate commit 92d59f0 in PR branch steven/fix-glob-patterns-no-dir with baseline commit 67f8a0f in branch master.

📊 Benchmarking dashboard

Found 1 performance improvements and 1 performance regressions! Performance is the same for 70 metrics, 0 unstable metrics, 66 known flaky benchmarks, 60 flaky benchmarks without significant changes.

Explanation

This is an A/B test comparing a candidate commit's performance against that of a baseline commit. Performance changes are noted in the tables below as:

  • 🟩 = significantly better candidate vs. baseline
  • 🟥 = significantly worse candidate vs. baseline

We compute a confidence interval (CI) over the relative difference of means between metrics from the candidate and baseline commits, considering the baseline as the reference.

If the CI is entirely outside the configured SIGNIFICANT_IMPACT_THRESHOLD (or the deprecated UNCONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD), the change is considered significant.

Feel free to reach out to #apm-benchmarking-platform on Slack if you have any questions.

More details about the CI and significant changes

You can imagine this CI as a range of values that is likely to contain the true difference of means between the candidate and baseline commits.

CIs of the difference of means are often centered around 0%, because often changes are not that big:

---------------------------------(------|---^--------)-------------------------------->
                              -0.6%    0%  0.3%     +1.2%
                                 |          |        |
         lower bound of the CI --'          |        |
sample mean (center of the CI) -------------'        |
         upper bound of the CI ----------------------'

As described above, a change is considered significant if the CI is entirely outside the configured SIGNIFICANT_IMPACT_THRESHOLD (or the deprecated UNCONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD).

For instance, for an execution time metric, this confidence interval indicates a significantly worse performance:

----------------------------------------|---------|---(---------^---------)---------->
                                       0%        1%  1.3%      2.2%      3.1%
                                                  |   |         |         |
       significant impact threshold --------------'   |         |         |
                      lower bound of CI --------------'         |         |
       sample mean (center of the CI) --------------------------'         |
                      upper bound of CI ----------------------------------'

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.DbCommandBenchmark.ExecuteNonQuery net472

  • 🟥 throughput [-32534.586op/s; -27547.967op/s] or [-9.163%; -7.759%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.HttpClientBenchmark.SendAsync net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+7897.602op/s; +8660.605op/s] or [+5.365%; +5.883%]

Known flaky benchmarks

These benchmarks are marked as flaky and will not trigger a failure. Modify FLAKY_BENCHMARKS_REGEX to control which benchmarks are marked as flaky.

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartStopWithChild net472

  • 🟥 throughput [-7566.444op/s; -7134.031op/s] or [-8.972%; -8.459%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartStopWithChild netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 throughput [-9899.832op/s; -8830.722op/s] or [-10.066%; -8.979%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+311.341ms; +318.053ms] or [+154.499%; +157.829%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-50.199op/s; -44.858op/s] or [-9.032%; -8.071%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+377.614ms; +381.561ms] or [+298.339%; +301.457%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+86.264op/s; +91.208op/s] or [+11.374%; +12.025%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+393.128ms; +396.436ms] or [+347.903%; +350.831%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleMoreComplexBody net472

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+4.692KB; +4.693KB] or [+98.785%; +98.801%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-62700.954op/s; -61865.289op/s] or [-48.785%; -48.134%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleMoreComplexBody net6.0

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+3.816KB; +3.816KB] or [+80.699%; +80.711%]
  • 🟩 execution_time [-15.453ms; -11.277ms] or [-7.217%; -5.267%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-60027.557op/s; -57254.504op/s] or [-43.817%; -41.793%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleMoreComplexBody netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+4.544KB; +4.544KB] or [+98.261%; +98.274%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-49045.375op/s; -46785.267op/s] or [-44.343%; -42.299%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleSimpleBody net472

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+1.315KB; +1.315KB] or [+106.388%; +106.404%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-260587.098op/s; -256083.453op/s] or [-26.607%; -26.147%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleSimpleBody net6.0

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+479 bytes; +480 bytes] or [+39.212%; +39.221%]
  • 🟩 execution_time [-26.034ms; -21.176ms] or [-11.610%; -9.444%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-73072.597op/s; -50537.122op/s] or [-7.806%; -5.399%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleSimpleBody netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+1.280KB; +1.280KB] or [+105.947%; +105.963%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-163704.256op/s; -147636.079op/s] or [-23.521%; -21.212%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorMoreComplexBody net472

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+3.378KB; +3.378KB] or [+89.003%; +89.017%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-73004.331op/s; -72224.231op/s] or [-49.131%; -48.606%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorMoreComplexBody net6.0

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+3.336KB; +3.336KB] or [+88.150%; +88.161%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-73724.462op/s; -70839.973op/s] or [-46.910%; -45.074%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorMoreComplexBody netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+3.264KB; +3.264KB] or [+88.493%; +88.506%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-56307.370op/s; -53681.027op/s] or [-44.856%; -42.764%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorSimpleBody net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+330323.676op/s; +353958.447op/s] or [+11.014%; +11.802%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorSimpleBody netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 execution_time [-19.115ms; -14.784ms] or [-8.811%; -6.815%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeArgs net472

  • 🟩 allocated_mem [-13.759KB; -13.756KB] or [-42.324%; -42.316%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.107ms; +301.383ms] or [+149.953%; +150.591%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+958.602op/s; +994.554op/s] or [+10.588%; +10.985%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeArgs net6.0

  • 🟩 allocated_mem [-13.722KB; -13.718KB] or [-42.341%; -42.329%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.378ms; +302.876ms] or [+150.977%; +152.741%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+2252.001op/s; +2470.739op/s] or [+17.224%; +18.897%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeArgs netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 allocated_mem [-13.722KB; -13.718KB] or [-42.341%; -42.329%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.132ms; +302.536ms] or [+151.183%; +152.394%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+1806.213op/s; +1933.213op/s] or [+17.438%; +18.664%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeLegacyArgs net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+296.529ms; +297.755ms] or [+145.644%; +146.245%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+585.185op/s; +600.228op/s] or [+15.513%; +15.912%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeLegacyArgs net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+291.234ms; +294.177ms] or [+142.374%; +143.813%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+2737.473op/s; +2803.851op/s] or [+39.770%; +40.735%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeLegacyArgs netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.530ms; +301.224ms] or [+150.204%; +150.552%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+1437.231op/s; +1466.810op/s] or [+28.528%; +29.115%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmark net472

  • 🟩 execution_time [-144.971µs; -140.225µs] or [-29.764%; -28.790%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+834.357op/s; +867.595op/s] or [+40.637%; +42.256%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmark net6.0

  • 🟩 execution_time [-138.007µs; -111.328µs] or [-31.652%; -25.533%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+851.241op/s; +973.829op/s] or [+37.009%; +42.338%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmark netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 execution_time [-138.683µs; -116.609µs] or [-29.713%; -24.984%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+741.359op/s; +825.574op/s] or [+34.223%; +38.110%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmarkWithAttack net472

  • 🟩 execution_time [-125.790µs; -120.754µs] or [-33.963%; -32.603%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+1317.603op/s; +1381.581op/s] or [+48.798%; +51.167%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmarkWithAttack net6.0

  • 🟩 execution_time [-101.593µs; -77.849µs] or [-32.433%; -24.853%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+1165.429op/s; +1372.440op/s] or [+36.330%; +42.783%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmarkWithAttack netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 execution_time [-130.759µs; -104.201µs] or [-35.770%; -28.505%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+1168.431op/s; +1381.799op/s] or [+41.930%; +49.587%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AspNetCoreBenchmark.SendRequest net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.497ms; +300.249ms] or [+149.480%; +149.855%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AspNetCoreBenchmark.SendRequest net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+416.998ms; +423.239ms] or [+453.085%; +459.866%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+851.839op/s; +1035.742op/s] or [+7.000%; +8.511%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AspNetCoreBenchmark.SendRequest netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable execution_time [+296.240ms; +348.131ms] or [+224.932%; +264.332%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net472

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+3.290KB; +3.295KB] or [+5.845%; +5.855%]
  • unstable execution_time [+249.747ms; +330.927ms] or [+114.831%; +152.157%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-617.243op/s; -557.192op/s] or [-55.928%; -50.487%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [+207.778ms; +341.019ms] or [+88.546%; +145.328%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-667.191op/s; -583.768op/s] or [-44.502%; -38.938%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+333.620ms; +343.626ms] or [+199.544%; +205.528%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-371.606op/s; -335.981op/s] or [-25.874%; -23.394%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSlice netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable throughput [+22.161op/s; +76.722op/s] or [+6.370%; +22.054%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSliceWithPool netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable throughput [-15.840op/s; +77.411op/s] or [-2.957%; +14.449%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OriginalCharSlice net6.0

  • 🟩 execution_time [-191.994µs; -139.471µs] or [-9.726%; -7.065%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+40.450op/s; +55.100op/s] or [+7.985%; +10.877%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearch net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+302.034ms; +303.494ms] or [+152.098%; +152.834%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearch net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+301.851ms; +302.767ms] or [+151.258%; +151.717%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearch netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+303.559ms; +307.176ms] or [+152.495%; +154.312%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearchAsync net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+301.275ms; +302.827ms] or [+151.290%; +152.069%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearchAsync net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+293.227ms; +295.826ms] or [+144.988%; +146.273%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearchAsync netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+305.422ms; +309.087ms] or [+154.801%; +156.659%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.GraphQLBenchmark.ExecuteAsync net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.144ms; +301.986ms] or [+150.645%; +151.570%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.GraphQLBenchmark.ExecuteAsync net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+298.242ms; +302.375ms] or [+148.646%; +150.706%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+30909.849op/s; +35711.459op/s] or [+6.138%; +7.091%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.GraphQLBenchmark.ExecuteAsync netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.987ms; +304.872ms] or [+149.241%; +151.671%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatAspectBenchmark net472

  • unstable execution_time [+15.275µs; +59.732µs] or [+3.773%; +14.754%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatAspectBenchmark net6.0

  • 🟩 allocated_mem [-18.882KB; -18.860KB] or [-6.888%; -6.880%]
  • unstable execution_time [-39.032µs; +16.655µs] or [-7.715%; +3.292%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatAspectBenchmark netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 allocated_mem [-15.316KB; -15.298KB] or [-5.583%; -5.577%]
  • unstable execution_time [-65.637µs; -6.980µs] or [-11.374%; -1.210%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatBenchmark net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+6.476µs; +10.610µs] or [+15.308%; +25.080%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-4877.625op/s; -3065.267op/s] or [-20.533%; -12.904%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatBenchmark netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable execution_time [-13.288µs; -4.698µs] or [-20.616%; -7.289%]
  • unstable throughput [+1237.341op/s; +3054.820op/s] or [+7.591%; +18.742%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Log4netBenchmark.EnrichedLog net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+302.233ms; +303.587ms] or [+152.765%; +153.450%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Log4netBenchmark.EnrichedLog net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+304.879ms; +308.424ms] or [+155.182%; +156.987%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Log4netBenchmark.EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.483ms; +301.624ms] or [+149.928%; +151.000%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.RedisBenchmark.SendReceive net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+32522.937op/s; +39343.481op/s] or [+6.156%; +7.447%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SerilogBenchmark.EnrichedLog net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+298.200ms; +300.171ms] or [+148.626%; +149.608%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SerilogBenchmark.EnrichedLog net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+298.569ms; +300.400ms] or [+149.927%; +150.846%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SerilogBenchmark.EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+302.687ms; +305.267ms] or [+153.503%; +154.812%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SingleSpanAspNetCoreBenchmark.SingleSpanAspNetCore net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.959ms; +300.736ms] or [+149.621%; +150.009%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+60955056.740op/s; +61309757.750op/s] or [+44.391%; +44.650%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SingleSpanAspNetCoreBenchmark.SingleSpanAspNetCore net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+421.884ms; +426.779ms] or [+524.688%; +530.775%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SingleSpanAspNetCoreBenchmark.SingleSpanAspNetCore netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+298.972ms; +300.126ms] or [+149.120%; +149.696%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishScope net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+68335.208op/s; +91179.758op/s] or [+6.380%; +8.513%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishSpan net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+85832.357op/s; +118522.282op/s] or [+6.644%; +9.174%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishSpan netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 throughput [+73345.144op/s; +82185.793op/s] or [+7.284%; +8.162%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishTwoScopes net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+38202.775op/s; +44416.103op/s] or [+6.937%; +8.065%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.TraceAnnotationsBenchmark.RunOnMethodBegin net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+50653.638op/s; +71788.650op/s] or [+5.659%; +8.021%]

Known flaky benchmarks without significant changes:

  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_RecordException_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_RecordException_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_RecordException_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartStopWithChild net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorSimpleBody net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSlice net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSlice net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSliceWithPool net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSliceWithPool net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OriginalCharSlice net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OriginalCharSlice netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ILoggerBenchmark.EnrichedLog net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ILoggerBenchmark.EnrichedLog net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ILoggerBenchmark.EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatBenchmark net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.RedisBenchmark.SendReceive net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.RedisBenchmark.SendReceive netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishScope net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishScope netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishSpan net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishTwoScopes net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishTwoScopes netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.TraceAnnotationsBenchmark.RunOnMethodBegin net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.TraceAnnotationsBenchmark.RunOnMethodBegin netcoreapp3.1

andrewlock added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 14, 2026
## Summary of changes

Tweak codeowners to work around a bug in our testlogger

## Reason for change

Currently there's a bug in the CODEOWNERS parser with the pattern
`something/**/here` which means it recognizes `/something/else/here` but
not `/something/else`. This is a workaround, until we fix the test
logger

## Implementation details

Add the extra entry

## Test coverage

errr

## Other details

See #9045 for the real
fix

#incident-57303
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants