track test branch for op

[erikayasuda]

Description

Testing

Risks

Additional Notes

[datadog-datadog-us1-prod]

 

⚠️ Warnings

🚦 15 Pipeline jobs failed

DataDog/apm-reliability/dd-trace-py | build linux serverless: [amd64, cp315-cp315, v126532274-233089d-musllinux_1_2_x86_64, 1]     

DataDog/apm-reliability/dd-trace-py | build linux serverless: [arm64, cp315-cp315, v113741357-d2b8243-manylinux2014_aarch64, 1]     

DataDog/apm-reliability/dd-trace-py | build linux: [amd64, cp315-cp315, v113741238-d2b8243-manylinux2014_x86_64]     

View all 15 failed jobs.

🧪 4 Tests failed in 4 jobs

DataDog/apm-reliability/dd-trace-py | contrib/kafka 1/4

test_service_override_env_var[py3.10] from test_kafka.py  

At request <Request GET /test/session/snapshot >:
   At snapshot (token='tests.contrib.kafka.test_kafka.test_service_override_env_var'):
    - Directory: /go/src/github.com/DataDog/apm-reliability/dd-trace-py/tests/snapshots
    - CI mode: 1
    - Trace File: /go/src/github.com/DataDog/apm-reliability/dd-trace-py/tests/snapshots/tests.contrib.kafka.test_kafka.test_service_override_env_var.json
    - Stats File: /go/src/github.com/DataDog/apm-reliability/dd-trace-py/tests/snapshots/tests.contrib.kafka.test_kafka.test_service_override_env_var_tracestats.json
    At compare of 2 expected trace(s) to 2 received trace(s):
     At trace 'kafka.consume' (1 spans):
      At snapshot compare of span 'kafka.consume' at position 1 in trace:
       - Expected span:
...

DataDog/apm-reliability/dd-trace-py | contrib/kafka 2/4

test_service_override_config[py3.9] from test_kafka.py  

At request <Request GET /test/session/snapshot >:
   At snapshot (token='tests.contrib.kafka.test_kafka.test_service_override'):
    - Directory: /go/src/github.com/DataDog/apm-reliability/dd-trace-py/tests/snapshots
    - CI mode: 1
    - Trace File: /go/src/github.com/DataDog/apm-reliability/dd-trace-py/tests/snapshots/tests.contrib.kafka.test_kafka.test_service_override.json
    - Stats File: /go/src/github.com/DataDog/apm-reliability/dd-trace-py/tests/snapshots/tests.contrib.kafka.test_kafka.test_service_override_tracestats.json
    At compare of 2 expected trace(s) to 2 received trace(s):
     At trace 'kafka.consume' (1 spans):
      At snapshot compare of span 'kafka.consume' at position 1 in trace:
       - Expected span:
...

DataDog/apm-reliability/dd-trace-py | contrib/kafka 3/4

test_service_override_config[py3.11] from test_kafka.py  

At request <Request GET /test/session/snapshot >:
   At snapshot (token='tests.contrib.kafka.test_kafka.test_service_override'):
    - Directory: /go/src/github.com/DataDog/apm-reliability/dd-trace-py/tests/snapshots
    - CI mode: 1
    - Trace File: /go/src/github.com/DataDog/apm-reliability/dd-trace-py/tests/snapshots/tests.contrib.kafka.test_kafka.test_service_override.json
    - Stats File: /go/src/github.com/DataDog/apm-reliability/dd-trace-py/tests/snapshots/tests.contrib.kafka.test_kafka.test_service_override_tracestats.json
    At compare of 2 expected trace(s) to 2 received trace(s):
     At trace 'kafka.consume' (1 spans):
      At snapshot compare of span 'kafka.consume' at position 1 in trace:
       - Expected span:
...

DataDog/apm-reliability/dd-trace-py | contrib/kafka 4/4

test_service_override_config[py3.10] from test_kafka.py  

At request <Request GET /test/session/snapshot >:
   At snapshot (token='tests.contrib.kafka.test_kafka.test_service_override'):
    - Directory: /go/src/github.com/DataDog/apm-reliability/dd-trace-py/tests/snapshots
    - CI mode: 1
    - Trace File: /go/src/github.com/DataDog/apm-reliability/dd-trace-py/tests/snapshots/tests.contrib.kafka.test_kafka.test_service_override.json
    - Stats File: /go/src/github.com/DataDog/apm-reliability/dd-trace-py/tests/snapshots/tests.contrib.kafka.test_kafka.test_service_override_tracestats.json
    At compare of 2 expected trace(s) to 2 received trace(s):
     At trace 'kafka.consume' (1 spans):
      At snapshot compare of span 'kafka.consume' at position 1 in trace:
       - Expected span:
...

ℹ️ Info

No other issues found (see more)

❄️ No new flaky tests detected

🔄 Datadog retried 15 tests - 11 passed on retry

🚧 1 test that failed was ignored due to quarantine

🔄 Datadog auto-retried 1 job - 1 passed on retry

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎

_{This comment will be updated automatically if new data arrives.
🔗 Commit SHA: 709832f | Docs | Datadog PR Page | Give us feedback!}

[cit-pr-commenter-54b7da]

Codeowners resolved as

Resolved from the full PR diff against main using the target branch CODEOWNERS file.
CODEOWNERS team requests not listed below are not required by the current file set.

.gitlab/one-pipeline.locked.yml                                         @DataDog/python-guild @DataDog/apm-core-python

[cit-pr-commenter-54b7da]

Dependency direction analysis

⚠️ Existing dependency direction violations

There are 255 dependency direction violations that already exist on the base branch and have not been changed by this PR.

Show existing violations (showing 5 of 255 highest severity)

ddtrace.internal.tracemethods -×-> ddtrace.trace  (internal-core -> product:tracing, score=134)
ddtrace.llmobs._integrations.langchain -×-> ddtrace.trace  (product:llmobs -> product:tracing, score=132)
ddtrace.internal.ci_visibility.filters -×-> ddtrace.trace  (product:ci_visibility -> product:tracing, score=132)
ddtrace.internal.ci_visibility.api._base -×-> ddtrace.trace  (product:ci_visibility -> product:tracing, score=132)
ddtrace.llmobs._integrations.base -×-> ddtrace.trace  (product:llmobs -> product:tracing, score=132)

To see all violations, download the layers-base.json and layers-pr.json artifacts from this CI job and run:

uv run --script scripts/import-analysis/layers.py compare layers-base.json layers-pr.json

[cit-pr-commenter-54b7da]

Circular import analysis

⚠️ Existing circular imports

There are 5 circular imports that already exist on the base branch and have not been changed by this PR.

ddtrace.contrib.internal.django.patch -> ddtrace.contrib.internal.django.response -> ddtrace.contrib.internal.django.patch
ddtrace.contrib.internal.pytorch._distributed -> ddtrace.contrib.internal.pytorch._rank_root -> ddtrace.contrib.internal.pytorch._distributed
ddtrace.llmobs -> ddtrace.llmobs._evaluators -> ddtrace.llmobs._evaluators.format -> ddtrace.llmobs._experiment -> ddtrace.llmobs
ddtrace.errortracking._handled_exceptions.bytecode_injector -> ddtrace.errortracking._handled_exceptions.callbacks -> ddtrace.errortracking._handled_exceptions.collector -> ddtrace.errortracking._handled_exceptions.bytecode_reporting -> ddtrace.errortracking._handled_exceptions.bytecode_injector
ddtrace.appsec._asm_request_context -> ddtrace.appsec._iast._iast_request_context_base -> ddtrace.appsec._iast._iast_env -> ddtrace.appsec._iast.reporter -> ddtrace.appsec._exploit_prevention.stack_traces -> ddtrace.appsec._asm_request_context

[pr-commenter]

Benchmarks

Benchmark execution time: 2026-08-13 20:49:58

Comparing candidate commit 709832f in PR branch erikayasuda/test-op with baseline commit 6f2816b in branch main.

Found 0 performance improvements and 8 performance regressions! Performance is the same for 612 metrics, 9 unstable metrics.

scenario:httppropagationinject-ids_only

• 🟥 execution_time [+2.518µs; +2.703µs] or [+11.779%; +12.643%]

scenario:iastaspects-lower_aspect

• 🟥 execution_time [+30.743µs; +36.763µs] or [+13.618%; +16.285%]

scenario:iastaspects-modulo_noaspect

• 🟥 execution_time [+26.787µs; +32.167µs] or [+8.588%; +10.313%]

scenario:iastaspectsospath-ospathbasename_aspect

• 🟥 execution_time [+80.975µs; +87.550µs] or [+20.957%; +22.658%]

scenario:iastaspectssplit-rsplit_aspect

• 🟥 execution_time [+11.227µs; +15.029µs] or [+8.059%; +10.789%]

scenario:span-start

• 🟥 execution_time [+1.314ms; +1.530ms] or [+8.216%; +9.568%]

scenario:telemetryaddmetric-1-count-metric-1-times

• 🟥 execution_time [+375.755ns; +423.288ns] or [+14.381%; +16.200%]

scenario:tracer-small

• 🟥 execution_time [+26.555µs; +29.253µs] or [+7.605%; +8.378%]